I sure do not know anything about this charity but the one that caught my attention recently.....

"When Condoleezza Rice headlined a 2009 fundraising luncheon for the Boys and Girls Club of Long Beach, she collected a $60,000 speaking fee, then donated almost all of it back to the club, according to multiple sources familiar with the club’s finances.
Hillary Clinton was not so generous to the small charity, which provides after-school programs to underprivileged children across the Southern California city. Clinton collected $200,000 to speak at the same event five years later, but she donated nothing back to the club, which raised less than half as much from Clinton’s appearance as from Rice’s, according to the sources and tax filings.


Read more: Clintons charge big fees to small groups - Kenneth P. Vogel - POLITICO

Now in the link it mentioned that she gave it to her own The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. You would think that with al the scrutiny...well, anyway that charity is under the gun....

Read here about their fundraising techniques...

‘Hillary Clinton Sold Her Soul When They Accepted That Money’ - Kenneth P. Vogel - POLITICO Magazine

AND in addition we have all heard about Mr Blumenthal, the gentleman in many of her emails in question whom she said was a friend and not an advisor...

"Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime confidant of Bill and Hillary Clinton, earned about $10,000 a month as a full-time employee of the Clinton Foundation while he was providing unsolicited intelligence on Libya to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, according to multiple sources familiar with the arrangement.
Blumenthal was added to the payroll of the Clintons’ global philanthropy in 2009 — not long after advising Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign — at the behest of former president Bill Clinton, for whom he had worked in the White House, say the sources."


Read more: Clinton Foundation paid Sidney Blumenthal $10,000 per month while he advised on Libya - POLITICO

These are from POLITICO...not a far right wing conspiracy, and similar articles have appeared in the New York Times, obviously not a Republican foot soldier.

I don't know how the Democratic party can allow her to carry the mantle of this party. If you read the last link you will find even employees of the Foundation have lots of big questions about the money being spent.

Wall Street makes money for itself

you forgot the other part.....and for it's investors.

Without wall st. many here would not have their retirement.

Old lady clinton
 

This person has done nothing. Clintons have the money and the only thing left is power. You can't trust anything she says.

"WASHINGTON -- One day after Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she "never had a subpoena" for the emails she sent while secretary of state, House Republicans on Wednesday released a document appearing to contradict her -- namely, the subpoena they'd served Clinton earlier this year."

NOW recall the fiasco with her husband on what is the meaning of "having sex" ?

NOW we have the debate on what is the meaning of

"When Clinton on Tuesday said she'd "never had a subpoena," that appears to be contradicted by the subpoena House Republicans issued her in March. But it depends on what the meaning of the word "had" is"

House Republicans Release The Subpoena Hillary Clinton Said She Never Received For Her Emails

And other good reading...

A Fact-Check of Hillary Clinton

She's a liar, just like her husband. They are arrogant and could care less what anyone else thinks of them.

This is obviously a thread of interest with over 10,000 hits.
Even though it is probably only ten of us or so with repeated hits to see the latest yarn being spun on this corrupt "lady".

Why is a person with so much controversy, so much uncertainty, so much dis-ingenuous play supported by so many democrats?
We all know there are the same types of good solid Americans in either party or race or religion who do in fact understand right from wrong and are law abiding citizens and good neighbors.
The only conclusion one can reach is they remain silent onthe subject, hence all we hear are the fanatic party loyals would back whoever the party puts in front of them.

Maybe the silents will express there displeasure in the voting booth in the event she becomes the candidate. I just do not understand why the following when there most certainly are better people in the party for the job.

The democrats have nobody on the bench. They are all in with Clinton despite her past. The left-wing mind set is one of denial. This is what we have come to as a nation - unqualified and corrupt candidates and uninformed/uncaring voters.

I agree. Do you and others have an opinion about why this is happening....being allowed to happen?

Is the answer locked up in the 50% or more who choose not to register/vote?

I subscribe to the old saying that all people are basically good and left to their own devices will do what is right.

I do believe most people, regardless of party, race religion would want the very best person for any job, especially one that is supposed to be for the people.

Why do we only hear from the party radicals that will do what ever it takes to promote whoever is on the ticket? Sort of like the "good Muslims" we never hear from. Why is that.

What is the event or events that will finally stir this nation to take it back to it's former stature....as a nation and as a people?

We are no longer that country. We have lost that part of the American Way when we let the small minority of disgruntled losers dictate over the voice of the majority. If one person feels slighted then the majority has to suffer. We coddle to a few regardless of the position of the many. This is the Obama Utopia that the delusional liberals cried for. The police have to have gov oversight and body cams, and now they are calling for the teachers to have gov oversight and body cams. How long before it will be mandatory for all to wear body cams so that the gov can "protect" you.

Bush started this liberal take over with his tax cut allowing almost half the population to slide on their obligation to contribute to the income tax program. They even went as far as to give refunds to the lower portion of non-earners; money that they never paid to begin with. Now, the socialist party (that used to be called Democrats) are able to control those votes to maintain a majority. After all, even though it was the Republicans that gave the lower earners the great tax break, the liberal party insists that the Republicans want to throw granny off the cliff. It was Obama that said older folks don't necessarily need hip replacements or heart transplants; just give them a pill for their pain. It's the Republicans that hate children, even though it's the liberals that want to kill them before they are born. They believe in killing innocents but are against executing the evil murders. They believe in a total separation of church and state, but threaten to take tax exemption away from churches that refuse to marry gays.

But, I digress.

Don't bother asking how Billary feels about a subject because "what difference does it make?" She will say exactly what you want to hear regarding her stand on any given subject. Not much difference from what we have heard from the present occupier of the White House. Billary can mistreat the media and they still scramble after her like she is some sort of diva :bigbow:. If you liberals need a female at all costs, why not find a better suited mental case like Caitlin Jenner? barf

NYT: Criminal probe sought of Hillary Clinton emails - CBS News

A criminal probe for Ms. Clinton???

I'm sure there is something the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy is not telling us, or maybe they're telling us something that's not true?

Ms. Clinton, the lady who loves the Little People almost as much as she loves herself, has told us she absolutely, positively did not have any classified emails in her private server whereupon she conducted official business as Secretary of State. I mean come on, since when does SecState ever really have to deal with classified information or something? I totally believe her.

I'm sure this is just a clerical error of some sort whereby several hundred classified emails made it into her private server. I'm sure any proper thinking person agrees with me.

I realize this is a bit late, but I just wanted to assure you that it is literally impossible for classified information to cross over from a classified, encrypted system to an unclassified computer system. The only way classified would be on her computer is if she purposely obtained it on her computer. And knowing from experience, she is violating federal law by doing so. On top of that, she improperly disposed of classified information, another law broken. If these accusations are true, she is a felon. Anyone working for her, would have been immediately fired for if they were caught doing these things, even without the classified information issue.

Unfortunately, the laws may not be applied uniformly to everyone. This has been the one constant throughout history.

Hey, we are lucky to have a classified information expert on the forum. He obviously knows all all the ins and outs of classified information from the State Department.

We should intently listen to his sage blatherings and totally biased minutiae since he is the expert - and it must be true - he told us! :popcorn:

I guess the choice is to either believe the poster or to believe Hillary. And when you consider that one of them is a KNOWN liar, the choice is much easier to make.

Aalways mocking. Are you just not allowed to respect anyone's position?
Nobody is asking you to accept or support.
Just be respectful there are others who do not think or support what you do.

Always the lame and disresctful dissing of your neighbors.
Of course under the cover of and hiding, as always, behind the keyboard.

I don't think you would be able to understand what he explains so don't' bother and just go back to stuffing your face with popcorn

Maybe not ... latest poll has Trump beating Hillary 45-40 in head to head match. Her numbers will drop even lower after she's indicted around Christmas time

Poll: Trump beats Hillary head-to-head | TheHill

And if you knew something that contradicted what I stated, you would surely share it, right? TROLL ALERT

Your posts always remind of the three monkeys ... covering their ears, eyes and mouth. Nice job.

And this from the one that believes Obie to be his/her messiah and Hilary to her/his virgin Mary. :thumbup: