Only in the vein of BHO is Hillary qualified. She's a lier, is deceitful, self absorbed, has very poor moral values and no ethics. So if this is the type of person you think is qualified to run for president, then that explains how BHO was elected twice.

:boom:

:boom:

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm Several posters have said Ruibo Cruz, et al will reduce social security but Clinton said she is going to protect social security.
The öperative"word is "said" Social security was enacted in 1934 and despite publicity to the contrary FDR was forced to agree to social security because of the usual extortion that goes on between the two parties. Politicians have been kicking this can (social security) down the road since then as it plays nicely to the masses. Folks this thread is sounding more and more like "my father can beat your father up"

Maybe it needs a rest?


Personal Best Regards:

[QUOTE=Guest;1049531]Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm Several posters have said Ruibo Cruz, et al will reduce social security but Clinton said she is going to protect social security.
--------

No, it is NOT the posters who have said that some of the Republican candidates will reduce Social Security retirement benefits. It has been said by THE Republican candidates themselves.

Personally, I am in favor of means testing for Social Security retirement benefits. If a retired person has enough savings and investments, they should not get the full amount of retirement and have it based on a sliding scale from a small reduction to full reduction.

Yes, everyone would still be forced to pay into SS and Medicare.

I`m the guy that wrote what you called B.S. I stand by what I said . This SS Agent was able to transfer to a different assignment which did not involve the First Family .
People forget that the SS is part of the US Treasury Department . Many SS Agents investigate securities and currency fraud .

[quote=Guest;1049649]So, how much of your Social Security are you willing to give up?

For those who are enthusiastic backers of Sec. Clinton for President . Please explain to us what you believe she will acomplish if she becomes the CEO of the USA .
I think that it would be insightful .

[quote=Guest;1049669] All of it. I current donate all of my Social Security to charity. I would continue to do that amount even if I did not receive Social Security.

So, how much of your Social Security are YOU willing to give up?

[quote=Guest;1049649]Thanks for being honest ... and spoken like the true Socialist you are. You guys love to "force" people to do things as a general rule.

Actually, and better still, request some Rodham-Clinton supporter contrast her ACCOMPLISHMENTS with those of Carly Fiorina ... who really was a CEO. (worked her way up from secretary)

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Carly_Fiorina.aspx

[quote=Guest;1049681]First let me say that the means testing and income redistribution was your proposal not mine. With that said, it is unlikely that I will ever receive any Social Security benefits. I sold a multi-million dollar business (sorry, Obama but I did build it) a few years ago and will not be eligible for full benefits for nearly 20 years. With means testing as you propose, I will no doubt forfeit all of it. So, to answer your question all of it.

Hillary “Fat Cat” Clinton is a source of continuing entertainment.

Her willingness to pander to any group, and say ANYTHING to get elected knows no boundaries. The most recent evidence of this is her pledge to “topple the top 1%” !! Unreal!!

Hillary Clinton Calls For 'Toppling' The 1 Percent

First of all, she’s now worth $150 million … so she’s in the top one tenth of the “one percent”. Words are beginning to fail me regarding her hypocrisy.

Second, she’s never had a real job … her wealth has come solely from her and Bill’s political careers, and most recently, in effect selling influence for future access.

Third, all of her buddies and friends are the top 1% so I doubt she will screw them (although who knows?)

Fourth, there’s no doubt there is a huge pool of resentful liberals with untapped sources of inner rage to whom this patently transparent appeal will resonate.

What a total joke this woman has become. That’s not to say the large number of dumbasses in this country won’t elect her, just as they did with Obama, but her “fakery” is apparently unlimited.

[quote=Guest;1049686] Socialist or Progressive? I have no problem with being called either one.

As far as forcing people to continue paying into Social Security and Medicare - just consider it a tax. We are "forced" into paying a school tax even though we have no school kids anymore, aren't we?

Interesting news developing,,,,,

"...one of the biggest benefactors to the Clinton Foundation has been trading with Iran and may be in breach of US sanctions imposed on the country."

No big deal, right ?

http://www.newsweek.com/2015/04/24/h...de-322253.html

So much chatter on here about Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. How many people actually know the purpose of the Clinton Foundation? I suggest you actually research the topic BEFORE writing your pathetic posts. You will find it is a charitable foundation that has helped milliions of people around the world. Of course, to most of the right wing nuts - and gang of 6 - helping people is not what they are about.

Don't even think about means testing for anyone within 20 years of full retirement age. People makes assumptions when they plan for retirement and it is just wrong to change the rules half way through the game. I don't care how much money you have, if you are within 20 years of full retirement age, hand off. Full disclosure: SS does need reforms that should be phased in over time. I would, however, immediately remove the maximum SS tax that can be paid in a year. This never made sense to me. And yes, it would impact me.


[quote=Guest;1049649]

Talk about pathetic! You are completely oblivious to the fact that the Clintons have gotten incredibly wealthy ... net worth $150M and climbing, while engaging in "charity." WTF???????

They combine a means to "do good" while fleecing and often quasi-extorting supporters, utilize their prior government service and get RICH. Yet morons and credulous people like you fall for it constantly. They count upon having enough stupid people such that they can play on the liberal heartstings and know they will get no flack. ... and you definitely prove them correct in their assessment.

Question: if Mitt Romney or one of the Bush's got rich doing this, would you not even see a hint of scandal? Of course you would, and so would anyone. Yet, because of the Clinton name, you instantly transform into the 3 monkeys ... hear no evil, see no evil etc

What makes your situation so doubly pathetic is you are apparently too dense to realize you're being sold a bill of goods while the Clintons are cashing checks. God help us.

[quote=Guest;1049701]Ok, Mr. Socialist, your honesty is refreshing even if your politics are not.

Apples and oranges ...school taxes are a social good from which we all benefit ... ie presumably an educated populace but sometimes I wonder when I look at the PC crap in schools these days.

The original deal with social security was you pay in, and you get something back. My point about "forcing" things remains accurate ... socialists think nothing of forcing people to do things because after all, socialists are enlightened and know best ...much better in fact than the common people who work for a living.

For Clintons, speech income shows how their wealth is intertwined with charity - The Washington Post

There is absolutely nothing wrong here, and would pass any smell test that anyone could possibly envision.

I mean, who could object to what the Clintons do on ethical grounds? :)

It is obvious by the nature of some of the posts here about Clinton....it does not matter what she did or did not do, right or wrong none of this matters. She is a democrat and that is good enough.

EVERYONE IS AWARE IT IS A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION !

There are many of such organizations throughout the world.

Problem is where you get the money from.....no matter your works, you cannot break the law to fund it.

Check out today's New York Times and read HER involvement AND the State Department in making some Russians rich with uranium in a deal followed by large contributions to the foundation. This is the NEW YORK TIMES, not some right wing conspiracy as she always calls it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...pany.html?_r=0

Here's some more anti-Clinton Crime Family propaganda from a right wing rag that's obviously out to get them.

The Disastrous Clinton Post-Presidency -- NYMag

Is it the belief of the Clinton supporters that she has done no wrong?
That her agenda past and present is sqeaky clean?
In a court of law one's life can hang in the balance based on reasonable doubt.
Is there no doubt about Clinton's transgressions?

An unexpected endorsement:

https://youtu.be/LrvV99PwVTg

I believe the most disconcerting issue about Hillary Clinton is that her candidacy will implode too prematurely

Personal Best Regards:

That silly piece of tripe was discredited by snopes long ago. Try to keep up.

I think the situation with Chelsea is an excellent reason to tax inherited wealth ... let's give exemptions for family farms and small business, but for offspring of politicians, how about a zero exemption? God bless America.

Hillary, in an act of incredible political bravery, has spoken out forcefully against sexual assault.

Blog: Hillary condemns sexual assault (with a straight face)

https://www.insidehighered.com/quick...sexual-assault

Hillary said when women of any age face sexual assault, then no woman (except for Paula Jones, Juanita Brodderick and a bunch of others who don't count) is secure.

I wonder if the Clinton supporters know how silly they look defending this dishonest duo. Even some of the main street media have given up trying to defend this duo and the manner in which operate. Its not that they are clever at hiding their dishonesty its that supporters are too heavily and emotionally invested . Let go they are greedy immoral and self-centered people


Personal Best Regards:

Here's an update on Hillary and items pertaining to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation as well

Hillary Clinton's Machine Sputters | RealClearPolitics

The Clinton Crime Family Foundation "forgot" to report about 1,100 foreign donations.

Hey, no big deal because it's a charity right?

So anyone who is offended by the Clintons selling and peddling influence have to remember, this is honest graft and thus ok. Plus, they are liberals and therefore immune to criticism as long as they tell us they have good intentions. Their credulous lemmings will no doubt continue to swallow that hook, line and sinker.

Clinton Foundation Failed to Disclose 1,100 Foreign Donations - Bloomberg Politics

And so far she has been running for less than a month.
Plenty of time for her to be knocked off her perch.

What would be refreshing is foe even the Clinton supporters to at least be thinking they better be looking for an alternate candidate to back.

She had less controversy than currently experiencing and she was knocked from her inevitable candidate perch....by an unknown, unqualified candidate who was also surrounded in controversy!

She will not survive. Her personna will not be able to handle the steep climb she has ahead. And this will continue right up until she is dethroned by her own party...AGAIN.

She's gonna win by a landslide. You right wingers are so afraid of her you started your lies 6 months before she even announced her running.. Wow, a woman president, a black woman attorney general, and a black president. Yall are gonna need new batteries for your pacemakers if this keeps up. Lol

Senator Bernie Sanders is announcing his candidacy for president tomorrow, Thursday. This should really give Hillary Clinton pause.

It's unclear if Sanders will run as a socialist (which he is) or an independent (which he is) or a democrat (which is who he aligns himself with in the senate).

These are exciting times we are living in. I only hope I live long enough to finally see a woman elected president of the United States.

Women of America Unite. It is time we move this country forward.

OMG here comes Sarah

Sorry to burst your bubble, but she's not even going to get the Dem nomination. Unfortunately, the Dems will come to their senses long before then. Even today, most Democrats still don't like having a sleazy, self-serving influence peddler for their Presidential candidate. That's a start ...

That does not mean neccessarily, then, that you are dedicated to Clinton. Most assuredly if there were a better woman candidate for the democrats that would be better.

And to be sure we understand fully where your commitment is, if the democratic party winds up with a male candidate and there is a republican female, you will vote for her, right?

How else could it be given your position in your post. If you are truly commited and not just singing from the the female democrat talking points.

First of all, it is truly mindless to vote for anyone simply because of their gender.

Second, it's always amused me how liberals seem to love mindless slogans ... "Women of America unite!" ... give us a break :)

This is starting to become too good to be true from an entertainment perspective ....

Hillary has just pinpointed the race problem as having to do with inequality and lack of trust.

First of all, this drivel is being spouted by a woman who, with her husband's help, went from dead broke to $200M by running a so-called charity. So much for inequality.

Second, when someone says we need to restore "trust" in the system, the Clintons are not the first people rational citizens think of!!

Un-f***ing-believeable!!! :)