Guest |
04-29-2012 12:30 PM |
Quote:
Posted by Guest
(Post 485894)
Coralway: Let me begin by thanking you for interpreting the intent of this thread and secondly for responding to it.
My interpretation of the phrase "You can't argue a bumper sticker" is simply that folks who display them feel so strongly about the issue that debate is out of the question.
Having said that it is my humble view that Biden is wrong on both counts.
General Motors infusion of government money was unnecesary. General Motors would have simply done what they are doing now mergers and joint ventures. Obama's intent was to reward the unions and he did that by handing over a good % of GM to them. This would ensure that he would retain union support. The people who really deserve credit are the same people who prefer anonymity because their profession and humble profiles demand it. The Navy SEALS do not want attention brought to them or their methods of operating. Loose lips sink ships. So here we have an ego-manic waving his arms and acting as if he single-handedly took bin Laden down when in fact he has neither the temperment or stomach for things military
We have far too many Americans acting like the political arena is some sort of reality show. This is serious business and it requires careful and thoughtful analysis of candidates, issues and solutions none of which can be accomplished by name calling and one upmanship.
Thank you again for your thoughtful reply
|
Totally irrational for once, Rubicon. You are usually right on the money but not on this post. If it had not been for the infusion of US money into GM, hundred of thousands of American auto workers and the trickle down workers from them would have been out of work. The US economy would have gone into the toilet and NOT recovered as it is doing quite nicely now. There was plenty of time for venture capitalists to have stepped in before the government stepped in - but it did not happen. One poster on this forum had even gone far as to say that there would have been some initial pain but free markets would have straightened it out shortly. Also your saying "rewarding the unions" belongs to the comment also. HORSEFEATHERS!
Also, I have not heard Pres. Obama waving his arms and shouting that he killed bin Laden by himself. You must be watching way too much FOX NOISE to believe that has been done. Remember, though, since some of your conservative posters have been quick to say whatever happens on the President's term of office belongs to him. Well, bin Laden was killed by US forces on Pres. Obama's "watch". Since 9/11 happened on George W. Bush's "watch", does he get the blame for that? I would not do that. However, regarding bin Laden's killing, that was a real time directive that came directly from the White House to kill him at that Pakistan house.
|