Guest |
05-06-2012 01:58 PM |
Quote:
Posted by Guest
(Post 486557)
I don't understand most of what you are trying to say in this post. Were you typing it on a Blackberry or something?
Your post is not as lucid as what I am used to from you. Is your blood sugar too low right now? Seriously, drink a glass of orange juice and I hope everything is all right.
|
buggyone: Having had an HR background you better than most should understand the need and benefit of diplomatic responses. Sarcasm seems to works better for union bosses. And so your above-referenced response threw me off guard.
In any event I will accept the criticism and hope to do a better job at clarifying my position.
By now I believe given all the press and bragging done by Obama and his syncophants that it is well establsihed that Obama did in fact intend to have bragging rights and to politicize his claim concerning the killing of bin Laden in an attempt to strengthen his campaign. And as I mentioned in another thread to you I found the WSJ arttivle (5/1/2012 Michael Mukasey) wherein Mukaseywrote that Obama made it clear that if the bin laden mission failed Admiral McRaven was going to take the blame. You may want to read Sunday's 5/6 Daily Sun for a related article to this one. So much for "the buck stops here" President.
Because Obama and his syncophants couldn't wait to boast, their disclosure of the trove of intelligence found at bin Laden home infuriated the intelligence community for obvious reasons and in fact bin Laden's killing ended any additional intelligence that might have been gathered. There is more but I don't want to write a short book.
As for General Motors while it may or may not be true that Obama kept GM alive, if true, the fact remains that we paid a very high price for it. Further it set a disturbing precedent concerning our economic and traditional business values. The free markets should have administered the treatment not Obama's White House. Obama trampled over creditors and sharholders rights and pandered to unions to garner votes. The free markets would not have done so. Again this is how presidential leadership acts out in banana republics. Forgive me but Obama is just so bush league and we need a real major leaguer as our president. I opine you decide.
Personal Best Regards:
|