Reflectors on multi modal paths and bright led light bars on golf carts

Reply
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-17-2025, 03:53 PM
tophcfa's Avatar
tophcfa tophcfa is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Posts: 7,463
Thanks: 3,500
Thanked 10,886 Times in 3,460 Posts
Default Reflectors on multi modal paths and bright led light bars on golf carts

What’s up with all the to do about the need for better night vision for golf carts? If people would simply replace their tinted windshields with clear ones their night vision would immediately improve dramatically. If you don’t believe that just try driving around at night with your windshield folded down. Tinted windshields are great for fleet golf carts that are designed for golf course use, with no consideration for night driving, but don’t make sense for personal transportation vehicles intended to be driven after dark. Would you wear your sunglasses while driving at night? That is essentially what one is doing with a tinted windshield.

Last edited by tophcfa; 05-17-2025 at 06:11 PM.
  #2  
Old 05-17-2025, 04:01 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,833
Thanks: 7,435
Thanked 6,103 Times in 3,142 Posts
Default

The led off road light bars are for OFF road. They are supposed to covered on public roads and streets, not to worry no LEO follows the law on that one. I was thinking about getting me train locomotive head light mounting it right in center where Yamaha emblem is. That way I can turn night into day even at tree tops just like off road light bars. O there no pointing them down cause the shine 160 degrees plus.
  #3  
Old 05-17-2025, 04:33 PM
CarlR33 CarlR33 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Newell the place to be in the South
Posts: 829
Thanks: 605
Thanked 594 Times in 308 Posts
Default

We noticed the south paths across from Sawgrass do not have reflectors either in the middle or on the side and it’s difficult to see the path at night. It would help if TV would looked at this long term. I plan to get a bottom of the bumper off-road light bar to point at the road and not blind people. BTW, my windshield is clear not tinted.
__________________
I will say the things that others are probably thinking but afraid to say.
  #4  
Old 05-17-2025, 05:02 PM
villagetinker's Avatar
villagetinker villagetinker is online now
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Village of Pinellas
Posts: 10,973
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8,035 Times in 2,924 Posts
Default

I strongly suggest getting MOTORCYCLE DOT approved driving lights, these are much easier to aim, and when properly aimed do not blind on coming drivers. The last time I checked these were around $30 for a pair and these are bright enough you only need one (1).
__________________
Pennsylvania, for 60+ years, most recently, Allentown, now TV.
  #5  
Old 05-17-2025, 08:26 PM
frayedends frayedends is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 993
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,111 Times in 421 Posts
Default

Good point on tinted windshield. We had a Yamaha with that and couldn’t see 3 feet at night. Traded for an electric evolution and opted to keep the non tinted windshield. So much better. We wear sunglasses during the day anyhow.
  #6  
Old 05-18-2025, 04:47 AM
Maker Maker is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 614
Thanks: 13
Thanked 532 Times in 237 Posts
Default

The "off road" light bars are flood lights. Meaning they send light in a wide pattern both sideways and vertically. There is a fallacy in pointing them down because a lot of light still goes vertically - blinding oncoming carts.
The ones put on carts by village golf cars are flood lights. 100% illegal to have turned on when on a street. VGC should know better than to put them on carts they know are being operated on streets.
If you want more light, be sure to get street legal lights. They have a focused pattern of light that stops at a certain vertical angle. They focus all the light below that line.
  #7  
Old 05-18-2025, 05:24 AM
golfing eagles's Avatar
golfing eagles golfing eagles is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 13,465
Thanks: 1,220
Thanked 14,500 Times in 4,777 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frayedends View Post
Good point on tinted windshield. We had a Yamaha with that and couldn’t see 3 feet at night. Traded for an electric evolution and opted to keep the non tinted windshield. So much better. We wear sunglasses during the day anyhow.
I'd be willing to bet $$$ that I could see more than 3 feet ahead through your windshield at night. (It's not covered in mud, is it?). Personally, I would suggest you not take that bet, since I have a Yamaha with tinted windshield as well, and no problem at night
  #8  
Old 05-18-2025, 05:41 AM
ltcdfancher ltcdfancher is offline
Member
Join Date: Nov 2024
Location: Well Point
Posts: 97
Thanks: 77
Thanked 89 Times in 36 Posts
Default

It was District 12 that decided to spend several thousands of dollars to install raised pavement markers on MMP in that district, right? Then the Project Wide Advisory Council (?) objected. The Council’s justification was that the markers might be a tripping hazard for walkers or contribute to a biking accident. If either of those were a valid Project Wide concern, then why do we have raised pavement markers anywhere in The Villages? Put these markers in the middle of every path. Walk on the left edge facing traffic; bicyclists keep within your lane (on the right). No one stumbles. No falls from bicycles. No need for super-bright lights to see which way the path weaves up ahead.
  #9  
Old 05-18-2025, 06:32 AM
golfing eagles's Avatar
golfing eagles golfing eagles is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 13,465
Thanks: 1,220
Thanked 14,500 Times in 4,777 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ltcdfancher View Post
It was District 12 that decided to spend several thousands of dollars to install raised pavement markers on MMP in that district, right? Then the Project Wide Advisory Council (?) objected. The Council’s justification was that the markers might be a tripping hazard for walkers or contribute to a biking accident. If either of those were a valid Project Wide concern, then why do we have raised pavement markers anywhere in The Villages? Put these markers in the middle of every path. Walk on the left edge facing traffic; bicyclists keep within your lane (on the right). No one stumbles. No falls from bicycles. No need for super-bright lights to see which way the path weaves up ahead.
Good point, except, while there might not be a NEED for super bright lights, we can pretty much guarantee a bunch of people will GET them anyway. (Mine is brighter than yours )
  #10  
Old 05-18-2025, 06:53 AM
Polarlys Polarlys is offline
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 36 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Had an interesting set of circumstances recently related to this topic. We live in the northern zone near Spanish Springs and going home one dark winter night on the cart path along El Camino Real almost had a tragic accident. Cart coming head on with super bright lights + cars on El Camino with brights on and a person walking at the edge of the path all combined for a potential accident. I was coming off one of the stop signs ( and yes I mostly stop) so accelerateing at that point and I couldn't see the pedestrian until we narrowly missed them. Although the miss was a close call it still was a miss and all were safely along their way. Just mentioning a set of events where I feel the super bright lights are more a hazard then a benefit and are unnecessary. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
  #11  
Old 05-18-2025, 07:10 AM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 6,927
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 7,342 Times in 2,866 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ltcdfancher View Post
It was District 12 that decided to spend several thousands of dollars to install raised pavement markers on MMP in that district, right? Then the Project Wide Advisory Council (?) objected. The Council’s justification was that the markers might be a tripping hazard for walkers or contribute to a biking accident. If either of those were a valid Project Wide concern, then why do we have raised pavement markers anywhere in The Villages? Put these markers in the middle of every path. Walk on the left edge facing traffic; bicyclists keep within your lane (on the right). No one stumbles. No falls from bicycles. No need for super-bright lights to see which way the path weaves up ahead.
No. Many of the districts discussed the raised pavement markers (RPMs) and then brought their ideas to the PWAC meeting. The PWAC discussed the matter but was mostly ambivalent. CDD5 brought it up again and pushed for an action. The PWAC was reminded of a 2015 study which recommended against the markers. The PWAC asked for an updated study. That was April.

In late April or early May, CDD5 installed RPMs on at least some of the MMPs within their boundaries. At the most recent PWAC meeting, the updated study was presented which again recommended against RPMs. CDD12 had previously been in favor of the PWAC moving forward on RPMs but changed their position in light of the study. The PWAC decided against installing RPMs. CDD5 was called out for making their MMPs non-uniform.

One paragraph in the study read that if the main recommendation against RPMs was disregarded and MMPs were installed anyway then they should be spaced at ten feet apart. It has been reported that CDD5 has decided to spend additional funds to meet the ten-foot recommendation.

The study did recommend markers on curves and in constricted areas and that is what we have today. These markers alert drivers that they are approaching a hazard (turn, lane separator, hill) giving them time to react and enhance safety for carts. These markers pose no additional risk to cyclist or pedestrians since cyclists would not cross the center lane on a curve or a hill and cart drivers have been alerted to pay closer attention.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough

Last edited by Bill14564; 05-18-2025 at 04:34 PM.
  #12  
Old 05-18-2025, 07:38 AM
Tyrone Shoelaces Tyrone Shoelaces is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 239
Thanks: 69
Thanked 124 Times in 74 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
Good point, except, while there might not be a NEED for super bright lights, we can pretty much guarantee a bunch of people will GET them anyway. (Mine is brighter than yours )
I got tired of people yelling at me for completely factory bright headlights so I put a light tint on them.
Blackout style.
  #13  
Old 05-18-2025, 07:43 AM
DonH57's Avatar
DonH57 DonH57 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Village Santo Domingo.
Posts: 3,923
Thanks: 1
Thanked 605 Times in 313 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DonH57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarlys View Post
Had an interesting set of circumstances recently related to this topic. We live in the northern zone near Spanish Springs and going home one dark winter night on the cart path along El Camino Real almost had a tragic accident. Cart coming head on with super bright lights + cars on El Camino with brights on and a person walking at the edge of the path all combined for a potential accident. I was coming off one of the stop signs ( and yes I mostly stop) so accelerateing at that point and I couldn't see the pedestrian until we narrowly missed them. Although the miss was a close call it still was a miss and all were safely along their way. Just mentioning a set of events where I feel the super bright lights are more a hazard then a benefit and are unnecessary. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Super bright lights on the golf carts don't help the driver when they're not aimed toward the pavement like they should be. They almost hit oncoming carts because they can't tell where they are on the cart path.
  #14  
Old 05-18-2025, 07:51 AM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,833
Thanks: 7,435
Thanked 6,103 Times in 3,142 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
I'd be willing to bet $$$ that I could see more than 3 feet ahead through your windshield at night. (It's not covered in mud, is it?). Personally, I would suggest you not take that bet, since I have a Yamaha with tinted windshield as well, and no problem at night
With plexiglass windshield there is a glare problem at night and especially in early morning and late evening clean or not and especially when dirty. Walkers/bikers early morning need to be aware the golf cart driver maybe don’t see them if angle right.
  #15  
Old 05-18-2025, 07:57 AM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,833
Thanks: 7,435
Thanked 6,103 Times in 3,142 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Shoelaces View Post
I got tired of people yelling at me for completely factory bright headlights so I put a light tint on them.
Blackout style.

Problem is those Yamaha lights don’t shine downward , no Yamaha golf cart lights shine like vehicle lights on low beam. You can adjust them down some which helps. But most don’t like that. They like lighting up trees see if any squirrels are out… I had adjusted mine down and to right. Which helps but still blinding on curves and up a grade.

Last edited by Topspinmo; 05-18-2025 at 08:02 AM.
Reply

Tags
night, carts, golf, vision, simply

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.