[anarick]

If let in will open the way for others who broke the rules.
I'd say OUT.

[Greggers069]

In his actions late in his career didn't diminish his skills as a player or his achievements.

[dbussone]

Out

[Birdie Dreamer]

In.

[Didiwinbob]

IN!

[TicoTexan]

Out

[Lark7]

Without question, In.

[msfooter]

Definitely OUT!

[thelegges]

His house was next-door to a friend of mine. Spent time having picnics and parties with him. Although I do not condone his earlier actions. IN

[Cedwards38]

At this point, if my count is correct, we have 16 for IN and 8 for OUT. Keep on voting people and let's see where this goes.

[Chi-Town]

No way! The sob deliberately spiked Ernie Banks back in '67.

[rirlam]

In - right after shoeless Joe Jackson.

[2BNTV]

In. What he did was paid for many times over as I don't think in his particular case, it should be a lifetime ban. He didn't cheat the game, as some who use PED's did. He always gave his all on the field.

Although, I don't condone his gambling and his lifestyle, he should let back in as he is the all-time hits leader, unless Iricho Suzsuki passes him in the next year or so.

[Taltarzac725]

In but after death and then not until a particular amount of more time. Shoeless Joe too but he deserves to be in now.

[Xavier]

Pete Rose, now there is a ball player! IN, with a notation.

Isn't it odd how many can't wait for someone else to fail and fall from grace. What's so bad in finding and celebrating the good (greatness) in the world?

Xavier