Atlanta Urgent Care shooting. May 3, 2023. Atlanta Urgent Care shooting. May 3, 2023. - Page 3 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Atlanta Urgent Care shooting. May 3, 2023.

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 05-04-2023, 09:13 AM
Richpetty42 Richpetty42 is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Lady Lake
Posts: 22
Thanks: 355
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I see it the same way, we make drugs illegal but criminals find a way to get them. So banning guns from everyone will only lead the criminals & psychopaths to get them illegally and the people in our country who are law abiding defenseless if they fall victim to a criminal who may be attacking them, breaking into their homes etc.
Now that most criminals face no consequences due to their crimes because of DAs and AGs who won’t prosecute them it may start looking like the wild west because the citizens won’t take crime in such a lax way when it comes to their doorstep, they will find a way to protect themselves and their property and not let the bad guys win a war on crime.
And guns are not the problem, if you put a gun on your table and walk away it will just sit there and nothing happens until you put it in your hands and pull the trigger, it’s the person holding it and their intentions on using it in a criminal act.. that’s the problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by manaboutown View Post
Criminals and psychos could care less about gun bans of any type and usually obtain their weapons through some form of illegal means. They are almost always the ones who pull triggers and murder people. All gun bans do is deprive law-abiding citizens of their right to protect themselves from vicious criminals. Having a gun of some kind for defense is essential these days in many areas of the country, both rural and urban, as murderous criminals are rarely incarcerated but released to commit more crimes including murdering folks,

Last edited by Richpetty42; 05-04-2023 at 09:20 AM.
  #32  
Old 05-04-2023, 09:15 AM
Taltarzac725's Avatar
Taltarzac725 Taltarzac725 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 52,181
Thanks: 11,636
Thanked 4,101 Times in 2,485 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njbchbum View Post
Yep - interesting - 'til I git to the Disclaimer! LOL

Now I'm gonna go look up HIPAA and gun permit applications! Thanks for your responses.
They are lawyers. I remember as a law library reference worker I would just be allowed to take the person to an area of the library and kind of point at a work or works for whatever they were interested in at that time.
  #33  
Old 05-04-2023, 09:19 AM
Taltarzac725's Avatar
Taltarzac725 Taltarzac725 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 52,181
Thanks: 11,636
Thanked 4,101 Times in 2,485 Posts
Default

No one is suggesting banning of all guns. That is a straw man argument.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richpetty42 View Post
I see it the same way, we make drugs illegal but criminals find a way to get them. So banning guns from everyone will only lead the criminals & psychopaths to get them illegally and the people in our country who are law abiding defenseless if they fall victim to a criminal who may be attacking them, breaking into their homes etc.
Now that most criminals face no consequences due to their crimes because of DAs and AGs who won’t prosecute them it may start looking like the wild west because the citizens won’t take crime in such a lax way when it comes to their doorstep, they will find a way to protect themselves and their property and not let the bad guys win a war on crime.
  #34  
Old 05-04-2023, 09:22 AM
Cobullymom Cobullymom is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 264
Thanks: 1,192
Thanked 728 Times in 198 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitley View Post
You have been on tik tok I see.
I have enough sense not to follow a Chinese trash app that steals your private information. Don't assume anything especially that I don't have enough intelligence or logic to speak for myself. But on the other hand you have just proven that you must follow tiktok trash..
  #35  
Old 05-04-2023, 09:26 AM
Kenswing's Avatar
Kenswing Kenswing is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: We're Here!
Posts: 7,888
Thanks: 1,533
Thanked 6,044 Times in 2,436 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 View Post
You do realize the site you linked is to a Bloomberg funded anti-gun group, right? Calling it news is quite the stretch.
__________________
Birthdays Are Good For You. Statistics Show the More That You Have The Longer You Will Live..

We've Got Plenty Of Youth.. What We Need Is a Fountain Of SMART!
  #36  
Old 05-04-2023, 09:37 AM
Blackbird45 Blackbird45 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 581
Thanks: 0
Thanked 657 Times in 272 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjrjck View Post
And because of the 1st Amendment, you have the right to proclaim your beliefs. And because of the 2nd Amendment, your well meaning ideas are just that, well meaning ideas. Can you imagine placing similar requirements on a person before they are allowed to express their views? You might say you can't equate the two (right to free speech and the right to bear arms) and I would say the Supreme Court has said no right shall be abridged. Placing such restrictions on gun ownership would do just that. Now, you do have a recourse. Use your poetic skills to stir up enough support to actually change the 2nd Amendment. It can be done.
The first amendment: are you not aware what been going on here in Fl. Banning certain books, what Disney can say and not say. I'm just saying there are many people out there who have firearms and don't have a clue how to handle them.
  #37  
Old 05-04-2023, 10:02 AM
mikeycereal mikeycereal is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: St. Johns
Posts: 432
Thanks: 25
Thanked 264 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Thanks for providing this for those who "claim" ignorance. Nobody "needs" these types of weapons. And it's not because they "look scary." Unfortunately this is just a little friendly chat site where others like us can simply choose to argue the point back and forth and the info should be pounded into the lawmakers because they either don't seem to get it or choose to ignore it.

I'm all for tougher background checks. Maybe having family members come along to ok the purchase and verify that their son/sibling/husband isn't some stockpiling psycho with revenge as a motive. Yes it's come to that point where mommy and daddy need to sign off already. And yeah it's been like that where a few bad apples make it a hassle for everyone, I get it but that's where we've been.
  #38  
Old 05-04-2023, 10:07 AM
rpalumberi rpalumberi is offline
Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 65
Thanks: 94
Thanked 96 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manaboutown View Post
Criminals and psychos could care less about gun bans of any type and usually obtain their weapons through some form of illegal means. They are almost always the ones who pull triggers and murder people. All gun bans do is deprive law-abiding citizens of their right to protect themselves from vicious criminals. Having a gun of some kind for defense is essential these days in many areas of the country, both rural and urban, as murderous criminals are rarely incarcerated but released to commit more crimes including murdering folks,
agree 100%, not sure why so many otherwise level headed people don't see this - the left wants to defund the police while depriving law-abiding citizens of their 2nd amendment right to protect themselves - there's a reason why its the 2nd amendment, right behind #1 freedom of speech (also under attack under the guise of misinformation, Russian or otherwise) - thank you for speaking out
  #39  
Old 05-04-2023, 10:32 AM
Taltarzac725's Avatar
Taltarzac725 Taltarzac725 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 52,181
Thanks: 11,636
Thanked 4,101 Times in 2,485 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rpalumberi View Post
agree 100%, not sure why so many otherwise level headed people don't see this - the left wants to defund the police while depriving law-abiding citizens of their 2nd amendment right to protect themselves - there's a reason why its the 2nd amendment, right behind #1 freedom of speech (also under attack under the guise of misinformation, Russian or otherwise) - thank you for speaking out
The 2nd Amendment is about a well regulated militia and not the right of private citizens to have weapons designed for warfare.
  #40  
Old 05-04-2023, 10:33 AM
Whitley Whitley is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,052
Thanks: 1,472
Thanked 804 Times in 401 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 View Post
In 2021, 447 homicides reported using a rifle vs 6,012 using a handgun. You want to outlaw certain rifles based on their muzzle velocity? Does a higher muzzle velocity make someone more dead? Rifles have higher muzzle velocities because (this really should not come as a shock) they are used to fire at targets further away. In addition, there are many rifles chambered with ammo that have greater muzzle velocity (i can not believe it has come to this. Ban requests based on muzzle velocity)than an AR15.
  #41  
Old 05-04-2023, 10:37 AM
Whitley Whitley is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,052
Thanks: 1,472
Thanked 804 Times in 401 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 View Post
Everytown for Gun Safety is the news now? That is like me saying "How About You Watch The News" and link NRA videos. I'm kind of sure your heart is in the right place, but you may not be knowledgeable enough on the topic.
  #42  
Old 05-04-2023, 10:45 AM
Whitley Whitley is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,052
Thanks: 1,472
Thanked 804 Times in 401 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbird45 View Post
The first amendment: are you not aware what been going on here in Fl. Banning certain books, what Disney can say and not say. I'm just saying there are many people out there who have firearms and don't have a clue how to handle them.
Banning books is just terrible. I remember how angry I was when I turned 12 and could not buy Playboy. Stop Book Banning.
  #43  
Old 05-04-2023, 11:05 AM
Number 10 GI Number 10 GI is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,737
Thanks: 5,353
Thanked 3,340 Times in 977 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 View Post
The four times as powerful as a hand gun round is true. True of ALL rifle rounds, not just those from the so-called assault weapons. The 5.56 round used in the AR15 is on the lower end of the spectrum when it comes to wound cavity creation. In many states the .223/5.56 is not legal to use on deer size game due to its relatively low power. The AK rifle round, 7.62 X 39 is comparable to the venerable old 30-30 lever action rifle which is not considered a "high power" round.
Your typical hunting calibers, 308 Winchester, 30-06 Springfield, etc., create devastating wounds. The .223/5.56 rounds in the hunting arena are considered varmint rounds for use on coyote, prairie dogs and other small varmints.
  #44  
Old 05-04-2023, 11:17 AM
Number 10 GI Number 10 GI is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,737
Thanks: 5,353
Thanked 3,340 Times in 977 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbird45 View Post
The first amendment: are you not aware what been going on here in Fl. Banning certain books, what Disney can say and not say. I'm just saying there are many people out there who have firearms and don't have a clue how to handle them.
There are no book bans in Florida. The law prohibits books containing certain information the responsible parents consider inappropriate for children from being in libraries meant for children. Do you think it is acceptable to allow Playboy or Hustler magazines to be in a library for kids? Is their absence from children's libraries not book banning?
  #45  
Old 05-04-2023, 11:22 AM
MrFlorida MrFlorida is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 1,904
Thanks: 100
Thanked 2,609 Times in 939 Posts
Default

Since you like to quote the 2nd amendment of our constitution, perhaps you should read it completely . It also states that " The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" Keep meaning to possess. And bear meaning to carry. This was just up held by the Supreme Court.
Closed Thread

Tags
law, firm, shooting, survivors/victims, kind


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 AM.