Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Current Events and News (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/)
-   -   Ban on transgender women running in 2024 Olympics (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/ban-transgender-women-running-2024-olympics-341220/)

Stu from NYC 05-11-2023 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cybersprings (Post 2216600)
You just cut the number of teams in half, e.g. instead of UConn women's basketball and UConn's men's basket ball you just have UConn basketball. And now not one of those women basketball players gets to be on the team.

Serena Williams, arguably the best women's tennis player of all time played the then 203rd ranked male. Serena lost 6-1. She claimed she played as well as she normally does. Venus then walked on the court and lost 6-2.

You are sadly mistaken if you think UConn women would beat out the even the bottom of the college male starters. I chuckle at your assertion that they couldn't even hold a candle to them.

Well said

Stu from NYC 05-11-2023 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PugMom (Post 2216636)
the only solution is to have trans compete against the other trans, in a category all their own

Makes sense but who would pay to watch it?

PugMom 05-11-2023 03:31 PM

@ Stu: :1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Aces4 05-11-2023 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216549)
So you're saying - someone who was born with the female anatomy, grew up that way, but "came out" as a transgender male, getting all the appropriate medical treatment BEFORE entering Olympic trials - including breast removal, hysterectomy, and hormone treatment to produce more masculine traits including lowering of voice and facial hair growth..

They should be trying out in the WOMENS' Olympics trials. Because he was born female and that's how you want it to be. Right?

I mean he's stronger, taller, has facial hair, no longer has a woman's reproductive system, or breast tissue. His hormonal balance is now that of a natural-born man, nothing more, he's not taking "extra" hormones but rather - hormone replacement. Just like a woman going through menopause takes hormone replacement. Except this one is for men, not women. But he'll be competing as a woman.

Because that's what you want.

I say - okay. That's fine.


The only fair answer here is to create a transgender classification for sports competition.

I have no axe 🪓 to grind here and say live and let live, as long as no one else’s rights are trampled.

JMintzer 05-11-2023 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boomer (Post 2216525)
I think it is vile to target transgender people whose lives must be difficult enough without being used as pawns in political ploys.

Attacks on transgenders — both verbal and physical attacks — are part of a movement to dehumanize others — and the number of people who are susceptible to joining in the hatred is appalling.

And don’t get me started on the incongruity of using “holiness” as an attempt to veil hatred and to obsess about what is between someone else’s legs. If an adult decides to do something totally legal, why should anyone else care.

Good thing no one brought that up in this thread (until you did...)

Quote:

BUT, that being said, I agree that transgender women should not be competing against female athletes who were born female. This is not just about the Olympics, it is about all levels of sports, from informal competitions to the awarding of scholarships. Height and strength can make all the difference in athletic competition……

Let’s be fair.

Boomer the Moderate (an endangered species)
Thank you for actually responding to the topic of the thread...

OrangeBlossomBaby 05-11-2023 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aces4 (Post 2216649)
The only fair answer here is to create a transgender classification for sports competition.

I have no axe 🪓 to grind here and say live and let live, as long as no one else’s rights are trampled.

I agree with the last part, and I don't care about sports anyway. But I don't think a "no transgenders allowed" is the right tack to take on this. I don't know what is the right tack, the idea of mixed teams seems more fair to me. And sure - even a transgender classification would be fine. If it's a mixed team, they'd have the same shot as any cis-gender man or woman at making the team.

Eg_cruz 05-11-2023 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bay Kid (Post 2216495)
Where are the woman's right people? So unfair.

Agree

JMintzer 05-11-2023 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216549)
So you're saying - someone who was born with the female anatomy, grew up that way, but "came out" as a transgender male, getting all the appropriate medical treatment BEFORE entering Olympic trials - including breast removal, hysterectomy, and hormone treatment to produce more masculine traits including lowering of voice and facial hair growth..

They should be trying out in the WOMENS' Olympics trials. Because he was born female and that's how you want it to be. Right?

I mean he's stronger, taller, has facial hair, no longer has a woman's reproductive system, or breast tissue. His hormonal balance is now that of a natural-born man, nothing more, he's not taking "extra" hormones but rather - hormone replacement. Just like a woman going through menopause takes hormone replacement. Except this one is for men, not women. But he'll be competing as a woman.

Because that's what you want.

I say - okay. That's fine.

Except that person has been taking high doses of testosterone for years, giving them a physical advantage over other women...

And yes, they are "extra" hormones, not a "replacement"...

Taking estrogen after a total hysterectomy is "replacement" therapy...

JMintzer 05-11-2023 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216550)
I also feel that transgender males/females shouldn't be competing for teams of the gender that doesn't match their biology. But if they compete in teams that DOES match their biology, then you'll have transgender women - who were born biologically male - competing against men. Tall women with no facial hair, no *****, wearing bras, competing with men. Because they were born with a ***** even though they no longer have one. That makes zero sense.

I'd rather see all sports open up to all genders. No more male teams and female teams. People can be on the teams selected on the merits of their abilities rather than what reproductive organs they were born with, or currently have. Yes, men are typically taller than women. But the average "random tall guy" still can't play basketball as well as the "tall chick with the full 4-year basketball scholarship at UConn."

And many of those college basketball men can't hold a candle to some of the Women Huskies.

So pick your teams with men, women, transgender, cisgender, nonbinary, whatever. If they can do the job, then they're on the team.

Then you can say goodbye to the WNBA, Women's Soccer, Tennis, Golf, Softball, Swimming, Track & Field, etc, etc, etc...

They will ALL be dominated by biological men...

JMintzer 05-11-2023 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216552)
And if a person's chromosomes are XX, she is biologically a female and should be allowed to compete against other females, no matter the surgeries, hormones, clothing she chooses to wear and so on. It's not fair to let her compete against biological males having XY chromosomes. It's that simple.

Good luck with that for womens' basketball, baseball, and hockey teams. That transgender male being forced to play on womens' teams because he has XX chromosomes is gonna clean up.

There are already rules against taking hormones to gain an advantage in sports...

Having a mastectomy or a hysterectomy gives no physical advantage in sports...

Women taking men's hormones does...

Eg_cruz 05-11-2023 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216549)
So you're saying - someone who was born with the female anatomy, grew up that way, but "came out" as a transgender male, getting all the appropriate medical treatment BEFORE entering Olympic trials - including breast removal, hysterectomy, and hormone treatment to produce more masculine traits including lowering of voice and facial hair growth..

They should be trying out in the WOMENS' Olympics trials. Because he was born female and that's how you want it to be. Right?

I mean he's stronger, taller, has facial hair, no longer has a woman's reproductive system, or breast tissue. His hormonal balance is now that of a natural-born man, nothing more, he's not taking "extra" hormones but rather - hormone replacement. Just like a woman going through menopause takes hormone replacement. Except this one is for men, not women. But he'll be competing as a woman.

Because that's what you want.

I say - okay. That's fine.

The problem with your statement is these men is, they have not completed the transformation from man to women they still have their original male reproductive organs.
So if a man dresses as a women and says he is a women, I am sorry it doesn’t make you one.

JMintzer 05-11-2023 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2216554)
What is it about the transition process do you think will allow a formerly-female body to now "clean up" against presently-female bodies? Does the transition process redefine bone and muscle structure in some way when going from female to male? The process certainly doesn't appear to redefine those structures when going from male to female.

If a woman transitions to male, they will take male hormones, which WILL increase muscle mass... It's already illegal in many sports...

If a male transitioning to female has the "bottom surgery", they will lose testosterone production, which will result in a decrease in muscle mass.

But... If this was done after puberty, the bone structure is already set, and that alone gives a mechanical advantage...

dewilson58 05-11-2023 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMintzer (Post 2216662)
(1)If a woman transitions to male, they will take male hormones, which WILL increase muscle mass... It's already illegal in many sports...

(2)If a male transitioning to female has the "bottom surgery", they will lose testosterone production, which will result in a decrease in muscle mass.

(3)But... If this was done after puberty, the bone structure is already set, and that alone gives a mechanical advantage...

1............good to know.

3......pre-pub "opportunities" scare the hell out of me if our society allows.

JMintzer 05-11-2023 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 2216594)
I would assume the Oly Committee and colleges and high schools and middle schools will start addressing the juices in bodies. I hope.

High Schools and Colleges are brainwashed to be "inclusive" and are loathe to stop trans women from competing... Lia Thomas is the poster er, "person" in this argument.

There were several trans track and field athletes who beat teenagers out of scholarships to college...

JMintzer 05-11-2023 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 2216614)
And how many trans people make the Olympics? Very very few in either the Summer or Winter Olympics. And there are many Olympic sports which highlight technical abilities developed over years of experience rather than just physical attributes.

A case-by-case approach would be far easier.

Since this is a relatively new phenomena, one would not expect to see that many trans athletes competing on an olympic level... Yet...

And I agree, I doubt you'll see it in women's gymnastics and a few other highly specialized sports.

But... If nothing is done, Lea Thomas will swim in the Olympics and beat many women. You will see it in women's basketball, ice skating, skiing, biathlon, cycling, track & field, etc, etc, etc...

JMintzer 05-11-2023 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PugMom (Post 2216636)
the only solution is to have trans compete against the other trans, in a category all their own

Then you would need 4 categories... Male, Female, Trans Male, Trans female...

LuvNH 05-11-2023 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu from NYC (Post 2216640)
Makes sense but who would pay to watch it?

Other trans gender people and peeping toms.

JMintzer 05-11-2023 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 2216663)
1............good to know.

3......pre-pub "opportunities" scare the hell out of me if our society allows.

To your 2nd ... er 3rd? comment? I agree...

JMintzer 05-11-2023 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMintzer (Post 2216669)
To your 2nd ... er 3rd? comment? I agree...

Ah... I see you added numbers to my post...

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/6a/dd...fd048b38ff.gif

dewilson58 05-11-2023 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMintzer (Post 2216667)
Then you would need 4 categories... Male, Female, Trans Male, Trans female...

& then categories for short people, fat people, blondes, seven fingers, beards, different bra cup sizes...................where does it stop??


a young person could identify as a 60 year old and play in the Senior Games.

:oops:

OrangeBlossomBaby 05-11-2023 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eg_cruz (Post 2216661)
The problem with your statement is these men is, they have not completed the transformation from man to women they still have their original male reproductive organs.
So if a man dresses as a women and says he is a women, I am sorry it doesn’t make you one.

This has nothing to do with "dressing as a woman." That would be a transvestite.

And the problem is that some people want someone to discriminate against because their fragile egos can't handle the fact that they might actually be somewhat less of a human than the rest of the human race.

Currently, it's transgenders. The cycle will turn back to blacks in a month or two, and then it's time again for the Muslims, and then it'll be the Jews again.

JMintzer 05-11-2023 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216678)
This has nothing to do with "dressing as a woman." That would be a transvestite.

And the problem is that some people want someone to discriminate against because their fragile egos can't handle the fact that they might actually be somewhat less of a human than the rest of the human race.

Currently, it's transgenders. The cycle will turn back to blacks in a month or two, and then it's time again for the Muslims, and then it'll be the Jews again.

Give me a freakin' break...

JMintzer 05-11-2023 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216678)
This has nothing to do with "dressing as a woman." That would be a transvestite.

And that is exactly what many trans women are doing... No hormones, no surgery. Just claiming to be women...

Many have become parodies of women. Dylan Mulvaney (of Bud Light fame) is a perfect example...

Stu from NYC 05-11-2023 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMintzer (Post 2216703)
And that is exactly what many trans women are doing... No hormones, no surgery. Just claiming to be women...

Many have become parodies of women. Dylan Mulvaney (of Bud Light fame) is a perfect example...

Given that females are going to lose scholarships to trans females, one would think the vast majority of real females would be rather upset as to where this is going.

Cybersprings 05-11-2023 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216678)
This has nothing to do with "dressing as a woman." That would be a transvestite.

And the problem is that some people want someone to discriminate against because their fragile egos can't handle the fact that they might actually be somewhat less of a human than the rest of the human race.

Currently, it's transgenders. The cycle will turn back to blacks in a month or two, and then it's time again for the Muslims, and then it'll be the Jews again.

As I replied to you 3 pages ago, you can accuse people of trying to discriminate all you want, but you are still WRONG. It is about FAIRNESS in sports competition. You can keep repeating a lie all day long and it is still a lie!

It is you who want to descriminate against and oppress biological females.

Cybersprings 05-11-2023 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216652)
I agree with the last part, and I don't care about sports anyway. But I don't think a "no transgenders allowed" is the right tack to take on this. I don't know what is the right tack, the idea of mixed teams seems more fair to me. And sure - even a transgender classification would be fine. If it's a mixed team, they'd have the same shot as any cis-gender man or woman at making the team.

Why do you hate women and want to take away their opportunity to compete in sports by making them compete against males and calling it "fair"??? A trans woman competing against a cis-woman would not have the same shot at making the team. That is why this thread even exists.
The transwoman would have a much greater chance to make the team because of testosterone and the effects it had on his body. If they had the same shot as a cis-gender woman at making the team that would mean they had almost no chance. They don't compete against men because they lose. Are the facts and logic tripping you up for some reason? You can't just say all men and women compete against each other is fair and have that statement magically be true. Men do have an advantage...follow the science.

Aces4 05-11-2023 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216678)
This has nothing to do with "dressing as a woman." That would be a transvestite.

And the problem is that some people want someone to discriminate against because their fragile egos can't handle the fact that they might actually be somewhat less of a human than the rest of the human race.

Currently, it's transgenders. The cycle will turn back to blacks in a month or two, and then it's time again for the Muslims, and then it'll be the Jews again.

I don’t feel that’s the case in any of this discussion.

The point being driven home is biological women are entitled to compete against each other exclusively. Not every fact of life can be leveled out by wishful thinking and this is the perfect example. Men who prefer to be women are fully entitled to that choice. They cannot, however change their biology to be able to compete at the same level as woman. It’s wrong and as simple as that.

All the extra posturing trying to make women sit back and allow a separate classification of gender choices punish and discriminate against their biological bodies is ridiculous. Anyone with any level of intellect and social conscience knows this.

jimbomaybe 05-12-2023 04:04 AM

[QUOTE=Cybersprings;2216710]As I replied to you 3 pages ago, you can accuse people of trying to discriminate all you want, but you are still WRONG. It is about FAIRNESS in sports competition. You can keep repeating a lie all day long and it is still a lie!

It is you who want to descriminate against and oppress biological females.

Of course its a lie, nonsense, that's why if you do not accept the lie you must have some sort of malicious reasoning a hateful individual , what else is left when facts don't fit?

La lamy 05-12-2023 04:48 AM

:bigbow:
Right thing to do as far as I'm concerned. I'm all for allowing people to choose their own identity, but definitely not for transgenders to cross over athletically.

Worldseries27 05-12-2023 04:49 AM

The major countries should pull out and form a counter
Olympics nearby. Wonder where the cameras would be

Cobullymom 05-12-2023 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtdjed (Post 2216462)
It has been announced that transgender women are banned from running in the 2024 Olympics against women. Some transgender comments about denying them the opportunity to participate. They are not being denied the opportunity. They just have to compete against people of their biological sex. Kind of like letting a heavyweight average boxer compete against a lightweight boxer. XY against XY, not XY against XX. Sports events are looking for the best, not the best imposter. If an XX wants to compete against an XY, let it happen, If a lightweight wants to compete against a heavyweight, let it happen. Go up to your best not down to your best.

All I can say is GOOD, there needs to be a ban..It’s already been proven it would not be fair competition. End of story.

Ldogg21 05-12-2023 05:10 AM

Separate Division
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boomer (Post 2216525)
I think it is vile to target transgender people whose lives must be difficult enough without being used as pawns in political ploys.

Attacks on transgenders — both verbal and physical attacks — are part of a movement to dehumanize others — and the number of people who are susceptible to joining in the hatred is appalling.

And don’t get me started on the incongruity of using “holiness” as an attempt to veil hatred and to obsess about what is between someone else’s legs. If an adult decides to do something totally legal, why should anyone else care.

BUT, that being said, I agree that transgender women should not be competing against female athletes who were born female. This is not just about the Olympics, it is about all levels of sports, from informal competitions to the awarding of scholarships. Height and strength can make all the difference in athletic competition……

Let’s be fair.

Boomer the Moderate (an endangered species)

Easy answer. Set up a separate division for transgenders. Let them compete against each other. Men vs men, women vs women, transgender vs transgender

Topgun 1776 05-12-2023 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2216550)
I also feel that transgender males/females shouldn't be competing for teams of the gender that doesn't match their biology. But if they compete in teams that DOES match their biology, then you'll have transgender women - who were born biologically male - competing against men. Tall women with no facial hair, no *****, wearing bras, competing with men. Because they were born with a ***** even though they no longer have one. That makes zero sense.

I'd rather see all sports open up to all genders. No more male teams and female teams. People can be on the teams selected on the merits of their abilities rather than what reproductive organs they were born with, or currently have. Yes, men are typically taller than women. But the average "random tall guy" still can't play basketball as well as the "tall chick with the full 4-year basketball scholarship at UConn."

And many of those college basketball men can't hold a candle to some of the Women Huskies.

So pick your teams with men, women, transgender, cisgender, nonbinary, whatever. If they can do the job, then they're on the team.

I'm wondering if you have ever participated in sports? None of that diatribe is anywhere near reality in the world of sports competition.

CoachKandSportsguy 05-12-2023 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThirdOfFive (Post 2216500)
If they were women, I'd agree.

Sometimes, reality stomps on in and crushes our most cherished fantasies.

yes, very true, and happens to every human at different times. .

behavioral law:
all humans want to be equal, but individuals want to be special

Catfishjeff 05-12-2023 05:49 AM

Easy solution: Create a transgender category or an all gender category.

mikeycereal 05-12-2023 06:05 AM

From day 1 when I saw a news clip about a biological male breaking female records at a school I was against it. There's nothing fair about it. Males have bigger muscles and more stamina and stronger breathing.

It seemed like more and more were jumping on the "let them compete" bandwagon, with only few (the opposing young females and their parents complaining). Though this does not affect me either way, I'm happy to see more bans on this issue and would like to see it world wide to include schools.

If not banning then biological male trans can still compete, but against the same trans from other schools. Not enough to compete? Give it some time. We can still include them on the girls' teams and they sit out if none of them are on the other side and play when they are for now.

This should have never even been an issue, but somehow it came to be. The different world we live in.

Andyb 05-12-2023 06:11 AM

Are you serious?

Byte1 05-12-2023 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fltpkr (Post 2216537)
I think that is a silly and completely illogical response to serious issue. No individual or family with children facing a sexual identity issue takes this lightly or treats it as a running joke. No one “wakes up one morning” deciding they are actually of a different sex - it is typically the consequence of years of nagging doubts, frustration and fear, and incredible heartache from trying to fit into the expectations of others and facing the most incredible cruelty when they don’t. Most Villagers are old enough and experienced enough to have met people from all walks of life and know that we are not all cut from the same cloth and sexuality is not some hard and fast rule that everyone fits into neatly. I am not speaking to the issue of athletic competition but to all the demeaning, thoughtless, crude and silly comments that this issue provokes.

It's called abnormal behavior. A mental condition that should be addressed, not encouraged.

The Olympics authorities have drug testing for a reason. Enhancement drugs of any kind are prohibited, period. So a woman that has hormone therapy should NOT be allowed to participate. A man that "THINKS" he is a woman, dresses like one and identifies as one is not allowed to participate in female sports, period. What is so unreasonable about that?
If a guy wishes to imagine being a female, dress like one and act like one, that is fine. But, if he wishes to identify as one for sports, employment, benefits of any kind...he should be charged with fraud regardless of his mental state. That would be IF/IF they had such a charge...and they should. That's my opinion, and that does not make me intolerant, I just don't condone that kind of encouraged abnormal behavior. And don't try to convince me that this issue is anything other than abnormal behavior. It is not hate speech, just recognizing a scientific fact, that there is male DNA and there is female DNA. Pretend all you want, but pretending is a mental issue and pretending does not make fact.
We are not the only country participating in the Olympics. Other countries have a say also. If they wish to discriminate, we have very little to say in the matter.
A horse cannot participate in a dog race and the dog cannot participate in a horse race.

Andyb 05-12-2023 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtdjed (Post 2216462)
It has been announced that transgender women are banned from running in the 2024 Olympics against women. Some transgender comments about denying them the opportunity to participate. They are not being denied the opportunity. They just have to compete against people of their biological sex. Kind of like letting a heavyweight average boxer compete against a lightweight boxer. XY against XY, not XY against XX. Sports events are looking for the best, not the best imposter. If an XX wants to compete against an XY, let it happen, If a lightweight wants to compete against a heavyweight, let it happen. Go up to your best not down to your best.

Wonder how God feels about it?

Bay Kid 05-12-2023 06:25 AM

Where are the woman libber's? This should never be allowed. No common sense in this country anymore.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.