[Barefoot]

Originally Posted by jimbo2012

My guess is enough pressure came to get the guy to submit landscape permits filed and just waiting for approval.

Originally Posted by graciegirl

Happinow, someone told me the folks that are out your back door put in their landscaping. What do you think? Is it better than you feared?

Jimbo, GracieGirl previously posted that her sources told her the landscaping was in. And GG keeps her finger on the pulse of TV. With 18,000 views, this topic is obviously one of interest. That is the only reason I was hoping for an update.

[Happinow]

I was hesitant to post anymore regarding my landscaping disappointments because I really felt the thread had gotten out of hand. I didn't mean to cause such a stir. I was simply saying that I was very disappointed in what was happening on the lot adjoining my property. I've certainly learned a lot with this event. Some of you missed my point completely and others understand my concerns. My neighbors initial plan was to totally enclose his lot with shrubs to make a dog park for his dog so that he could let his dog out on his property without a leash, thus creating a barrier. These shrubs would run the entire length of my golf course view and then some. I read that no barriers of any kind would be permitted in TV, so I expected his plan to be shut down. I believe his landscaper told him that he was unable to put in shrubs along the property lines if he totally enclosed his lot. He then changed his plans and left about a 10-15 foot space open so that his property was not totally enclosed, thus eliminating the term "barrier". This alteration allowed his permit to be granted. I learned that dogs do not have to be on a leash if they are on your property. I thought they did if they were outside of the home. I also learned that you can do what ever you want with your property....it's your property. I am however, greatly disappointed that my neighbors would not consider what they are doing to our view as well as our neighbors. The rest of us were kind enough to consult with each other before we landscaped to be sure we could all see the course. It was the neighborly thing to do. He could easily apply landscaping without hindering our view at all and it seems selfish to me that he wouldn't consider the views of others who have paid a premium for their lot as well. On the bright side, We love our home and our lot (still). Life goes on and we will make the best of it. Perhaps the shrubs will be a blessing after all.

[Barefoot]

Originally Posted by Happinow

I was hesitant to post anymore regarding my landscaping disappointments because I really felt the thread had gotten out of hand. I didn't mean to cause such a stir. I was simply saying that I was very disappointed in what was happening on the lot adjoining my property. I've certainly learned a lot with this event. Some of you missed my point completely and others understand my concerns. My neighbors initial plan was to totally enclose his lot with shrubs to make a dog park for his dog so that he could let his dog out on his property without a leash, thus creating a barrier. These shrubs would run the entire length of my golf course view and then some. I read that no barriers of any kind would be permitted in TV, so I expected his plan to be shut down. I believe his landscaper told him that he was unable to put in shrubs along the property lines if he totally enclosed his lot. He then changed his plans and left about a 10-15 foot space open so that his property was not totally enclosed, thus eliminating the term "barrier". This alteration allowed his permit to be granted. I learned that dogs do not have to be on a leash if they are on your property. I thought they did if they were outside of the home. I also learned that you can do what ever you want with your property....it's your property. I am however, greatly disappointed that my neighbors would not consider what they are doing to our view as well as our neighbors. The rest of us were kind enough to consult with each other before we landscaped to be sure we could all see the course. It was the neighborly thing to do. He could easily apply landscaping without hindering our view at all and it seems selfish to me that he wouldn't consider the views of others who have paid a premium for their lot as well. On the bright side, We love our home and our lot (still). Life goes on and we will make the best of it. Perhaps the shrubs will be a blessing after all.

Thanks for the update. I'm glad to hear that you can live with the landscaping and still enjoy your home and your lot.

[jimbo2012]

Great, so the mayor (Gracie) was correct, boy howdy she knows everything

[Barefoot]

Originally Posted by jimbo2012

Great, so the mayor (Gracie) was correct, boy howdy she know everything

GG is usually an accurate source of information. You can take her to the bank. Or something like that.

[Happinow]

Originally Posted by jimbo2012

Great, so the mayor (Gracie) was correct, boy howdy she knows everything

Not everything.....

[Joaniesmom]

I think your comment about the shrubs being a blessing after all is right on. The less you have to see of this guy and his Bumpus Hounds, the better.

[philnpat]

Originally Posted by Happinow

Not everything.....

Originally Posted by jimbo2012

Great, so the mayor (Gracie) was correct, boy howdy she knows everything

If Gracie gave me a tip on a horse, I'd bet on it!

[shcisamax]

A theoretical: If you wanted to landscape or perhaps put in a large enclosure with your huge dream lanaii, pool, and spa and it was going to cut in the line of view of your neighbor(s) or somewhat impact their property, would you consult them before doing so and if it was not in their best interest, would you agree not to put in the enclosure as planned or give up that lot and find another that would be less offending to one or another of your neighbors? Or would you feel it is your property and this was what you planned for your lifestyle? It is an interesting dilemma because presumably we all want to have good relations with our neighbors but just how far does one go to accommodate them? In this case, however, it appears the neighbor didn't give a hoot about pacifying and managed to comply with ordinance but not to the remedy of Happinow's view. When those shrubs are grown, albeit it will affect the view at present, perhaps another one will be there that is just as nice but in a different way. Maybe more privacy?

[Happinow]

Originally Posted by Barefoot

Jimbo, GracieGirl previously posted that her sources told her the landscaping was in. And GG keeps her finger on the pulse of TV. With 18,000 views, this topic is obviously one of interest. That is the only reason I was hoping for an update.

The landscaping hasn't even begun so GG has been misinformed.

[jimbo2012]

Haaaaa, forget about a tip on horse then

[Mudder]

I agree with GG, when you're 72 you are happy that you can get up and go to the window and see the bushes !
Get a grip, people, this thread has lasted way to long.

[skyc6]

Originally Posted by Happinow

The landscaping hasn't even begun so GG has been misinformed.

Gracie was misinformed by "someone," but, of course, she very wisely came to the OP for comfirmation of this, so, I say, she still retains her Boy Howdy title!

[gomoho]

Dear Happinow - it was an interesting situation and we all readily gave our opinions - whether you wanted them or not. So things seem to be somewhat resolved and hopefully you will enjoy whatever comes of it. Now we'll move on to the next neighbor's dilemna and look forward to those posts as well. Enjoyed visiting with you on TOTV.

[graciegirl]

Originally Posted by graciegirl

We say that in Ohio too. I think we said it first.

Happinow, someone told me the folks that are out your back door put in their landscaping. What do you think?

Is it better than you feared?

I am quoting myself.

Obviously that "someone" was wrong.

I still say. Least said, soonest mended.
All's well that ends well.
and Much ado about nothing.