[Altavia]

An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19 | PNAS

Conclusion

Our review of the literature offers evidence in favor of widespread mask use as source control to reduce community transmission: Nonmedical masks use materials that obstruct particles of the necessary size; people are most infectious in the initial period postinfection, where it is common to have few or no symptoms (45, 46, 141); nonmedical masks have been effective in reducing transmission of respiratory viruses; and places and time periods where mask usage is required or widespread have shown substantially lower community transmission.

The available evidence suggests that near-universal adoption of nonmedical masks when out in public, in combination with complementary public health measures, could successfully reduce Re
to below 1, thereby reducing community spread if such measures are sustained. Economic analysis suggests that mask wearing mandates could add 1 trillion dollars to the US GDP (32, 34).

Models suggest that public mask wearing is most effective at reducing spread of the virus when compliance is high (39). We recommend that mask use requirements are implemented by governments, or, when governments do not, by organizations that provide public-facing services. Such mandates must be accompanied by measures to ensure access to masks, possibly including distribution and rationing mechanisms so that they do not become discriminatory. Given the value of the source control principle, especially for presymptomatic people, it is not sufficient for only employees to wear masks; customers must wear masks as well.

It is also important for health authorities to provide clear guidelines for the production, use, and sanitization or reuse of face masks, and consider their distribution as shortages allow. Clear and implementable guidelines can help increase compliance, and bring communities closer to the goal of reducing and ultimately stopping the spread of COVID-19.

When used in conjunction with widespread testing, contact tracing, quarantining of anyone that may be infected, hand washing, and physical distancing, face masks are a valuable tool to reduce community transmission. All of these measures, through their effect on Re, have the potential to reduce the number of infections. As governments exit lockdowns, keeping transmissions low enough to preserve health care capacity will be critical until a vaccine can be developed.

[Pairadocs]

Interesting ! These pop articles are all the things we all learned in grad school aren't they ? It's all in the language to get yourself published...LOL ! And hey, it works so why would it end ? All those important words, the ones that get it published but they count on people not even taking into account: "in combination with", "may", "could substantially", "our review of the literature" (what literature ? By whom ? What was it objective or subjective ? How many subjects ? Control groups ? and on and on and on... we all know the drill if we've been through a grad program and especially doctoral studies). Other often used words and phrases: tend to suggest, shows a possible trend, may, could, models suggest IF...... fill in the blank for if, and the final all of these measures together have the "potential"... Maybe it would serve our country well if we considered teaching in high school, some of the critical analysis skills we (for some unclear reason ? ?) reserve only for a few M.S., M.A., M.B.A. students but teach to our Ph.D. students before they they undertake their research careers. Would certainly benefit our entire country of people had these critical skills just to live their everyday lives ! Take a close look at graphs you see in publications... just sayin'

[Altavia]

LOL Paradocs, that one does read a bit like virgin's talking about sex :-)

Hopefully used to help the greater good...