![]() |
The curve has been flattened
The goal of staying home, wearing masks and social distancing was to “flatten the curve”. It was never about eradicating the virus - it was about not overrunning hospital ICU units. We have achieved that goal. Those same experts who suggested flattening the curve, told us back then that it would save lives by not over taxing our healthcare facilities. It was not about preventing people from getting the virus, just about reducing the chances of everyone getting it at once. We have done that. That was the reason for the lockdown, but people have forgotten that. Mission accomplished, now it is time to move on.
|
I think until we have no more fatal car accidents no one should be able to drive.
|
You are correct. Now they are furloughing our Doctors and nurses. Pray a real medical emergency does not happen in the midst of hospitals losing millions and closing down. Live on, smile and let's get through this reasonably. Please be logical even though it is difficult in the face of fear.
|
Quote:
|
Empty hospital beds....ICUs only at 30% of capacity, hospital ships and field hospitals never or minimally used, a country awash in masks and gloves....respirators at $ 16,000 a unit sitting in warehouses....government handouts like candy for things not even related to CV19, like AMTRAK and the Kennedy Arts Center....sounds like a good overblown crisis to me....
|
Quote:
|
If you are waiting for the last person to die from Covid before it is "over", you might as well stay indoors with your mask on and wait for your own demise.
|
And you read it in the internet so it must be true
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Goal
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Cases in the U.S. | CDC TOTAL CASES 1,300,696 26,660 New Cases* |
Goal
Quote:
I know I practiced social distancing and wore a mask when needed to lessen my chances of getting sick. Did you only observe precautions to flatten the curve as a social benefit and will now expose yourself to getting Covid-19 since the hospitals are no longer overwhelmed? Good luck with that, I don’t think in the real world people protected themselves because they wanted to flatten the curve and not because they want to be personally safe. Since the curve is flattened, and that’s what you think matters, do what you did before, go out, shake hands ,etc. just stay away from me. |
Quote:
I know that is a factor for the two of us. We are hoping for a vaccine or a medical tool that would make it less deadly. |
Quote:
|
Flattening
Quote:
That does not exactly make me feel better and now risk getting sick. |
Quote:
|
15,000 dead New Yorkers doesn't sound like an over blown crisis to me.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
vaccine for aids has been sought for lots longer - 1981,,, waiting on kung flu vaccine ? call me - i have a bridge for sale,,, since some think n y times is go-to source of truth, i'll even run an ad there
|
Not sure what figures you're looking at but our numbers are still going up, not down. What's your hurry?
|
Quote:
|
Just because the curve is flattening, and you will be able to get into a hospital for care, doesn't mean that you will be able to be cured. The problem with this disease is that in many cases it can't be cured and you only get into the hospital for them to try. Until there's a vaccine or cure this isn't over.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If all the fatal car accidents happened within a 2 month period, then yes, you would have to think about driving habits. Not apples and oranges comparison.
|
Quote:
404 Not Found The cases by city and county begin on page 6, listed in order by number of cases, so you have to scroll a ways to find The Villages. A big part of the rationale for the lockdown/stay-at-home was that estimates of cases (e.g., Cuomo, 200,000+ in NY) was taken to mean that a like number of hospital beds and ventilators would be required. Thankfully, that turned out not to be true. In Florida, of 39,514 cases to date, 7,171 (18%) required hospitalization. 1,721 deceased (4.4%). Same source as above. At the same time, there is considerable evidence of deteriorating health in other areas, which provides a strong rationale for reopening in an intelligent way. This includes, as I have posted in the Health Forum, young children not keeping wellness appointments (20 to 30% of normal) thus forgoing vaccinations for potentially fatal childhood diseases; emergency room visits occurring at 40 to 50% of normal, including for heart attacks which normally increase when there is an increase in respiratory illness; opiod deaths increasing; cancer patients unable to get elective surgery (thankfully this last seems to be ending as states relax their rules). Sources for these statements as posted in the Health Forum The nation is paying a dire cost for the lockdown orders. It is now time for those who are most vulnerable to continue to shelter in place while the rest of the country returns to normal. |
The "404 not found" citation is Home | Florida Disaster, click on Latest Information on COVID--19, then on Daily Report.
|
So you’re at it again, this is a duplicate from ND
Quote:
It’s keep your name off of a park bench. Stop trying to sell this “goal achieved” thing and suggest we should be “moving on”. We are not at a green light. look at the Revised death toll estimates The president just up’d his death toll estimates 2x to 120k. The CDC along with some wiz MIT Modeler think 261k by august. the Governor Recently said 85% of the deaths in this state were over 65. The average age in TV is around 72. Let individuals here make their own decisions, you shouldn’t be encouraging anything. |
For a thoughtful essay on the tradeoffs between maintaining the shutdown and reopening, to to The Atlantic and search for the article titled "Take the Shutdown Skeptics Seriously."
Here's a sample "The general point is that minimizing the number of COVID-19 deaths today or a month from now or six months from now may or may not minimize the human costs of the pandemic when the full spectrum of human consequences is considered." |
Quote:
|
Yes, and they will have to monitor whether certain locations are headed for trouble. Otherwise, open back up
millions are losing their jobs, their small businesses built on hard work and sacrifice. Big businesses are going under. Hospitals are going under. People will lose their homes, And not be able to feed their families. This is a train wreck if we don’t open back up. You personally, are going to have to pay for it all when the country goes down the tubes. The “government” is funded by YOU. Just hope that we can fund our national defense And social security. There are lots of consequences to not opening back up. You can’t have such a narrow focus. We don’t shut down the country to keep people from dying of the flu; even though this is worse we still can’t just shut the country down indefinitely |
I personally wish the herd immunity crowd would just be more honest and call it what it really is.
Since the concept is to make the herd stronger by eliminating the old, weak, sick or otherwise medically compromised, just call it what it is - "thinning the herd." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.