District 3 to vote on 0,000 in sinkhole repairs at two retention basins District 3 to vote on $260,000 in sinkhole repairs at two retention basins - Talk of The Villages Florida

District 3 to vote on $260,000 in sinkhole repairs at two retention basins

Reply
Thread Tools
  #1  
Unread Yesterday, 01:20 PM
News in The Villages's Avatar
News in The Villages News in The Villages is offline
Editor
TOTV Sponsor
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: The Villages Florida
Posts: 1,342
Thanks: 0
Thanked 608 Times in 397 Posts
Default District 3 to vote on $260,000 in sinkhole repairs at two retention basins

Depressions drained water from Basins 3-2 and 3-9 this fall; one repair is already done and the other awaits approval Friday.

More...
  #2  
Unread Yesterday, 01:29 PM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 5,756
Thanks: 327
Thanked 4,697 Times in 2,005 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gazette View Post
Depressions drained water from Basins 3-2 and 3-9 this fall; one repair is already done and the other awaits approval Friday.

More...
"The water loss also caused a 24-year-old, 48-inch metal stormwater pipe to collapse after it lost the water pressure that supported it, the report says."


Odd design.
  #3  
Unread Yesterday, 01:35 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Diamond Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 10,005
Thanks: 3,437
Thanked 9,652 Times in 3,991 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
"The water loss also caused a 24-year-old, 48-inch metal stormwater pipe to collapse after it lost the water pressure that supported it, the report says."


Odd design.
I'm still trying to figure out what created pressure inside a stormwater pipe. If it was simply gravity-fed into the ponds then there was no pressure in the pipe at all.

Perhaps the loss of water revealed that the pipe had collapsed.

It would be even more suspicious if the sinkhole was adjacent to the collapsed pipe.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
  #4  
Unread Yesterday, 04:09 PM
Jayhawk's Avatar
Jayhawk Jayhawk is offline
Gold Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,821
Thanks: 11
Thanked 2,096 Times in 652 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
"The water loss also caused a 24-year-old, 48-inch metal stormwater pipe to collapse after it lost the water pressure that supported it, the report says."


Odd design.
Odd design that lasted a quarter of a century.
  #5  
Unread Today, 07:10 AM
randykw's Avatar
randykw randykw is offline
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 96
Thanks: 859
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
Default

Located in my Village of Summerhill. It STUNK at first when all the fish were decaying. The District did take care of the stinky mess.
__________________
Mobile/Madison/Huntsville/Madison/Athens, AL. Apple Valley, MN. Memphis, TN. Cottage Grove, MN. Mobile, AL. THE VILLAGES!
  #6  
Unread Today, 07:24 AM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 5,756
Thanks: 327
Thanked 4,697 Times in 2,005 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
"The water loss also caused a 24-year-old, 48-inch metal stormwater pipe to collapse after it lost the water pressure that supported it, the report says."


Odd design.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawk View Post
Odd design that lasted a quarter of a century.
It lasted until there was a catastrophic failure. There are really only 2 reasons for spontaneous catastrophic failures ... poor design or poor installation.

Typical design lifetime of municipal drainage systems, is 50-100 years.

CMP pipe is not designed to be "supported by water pressure" and the expected service life of properly installed CMP, is closer to 50 years than 24 years. If it was Type 2 CMP, closer to 75 years.

If the newspaper reporting is accurate, a more appropriate engineering spec might have been RCP or another alternative. Of course, CMP is one of the cheapest options & you usually get what you pay for.
Attached Thumbnails
Screenshot 2026-11-13 at 7.16.32 AM.jpg   Screenshot 2026-11-13 at 7.18.09 AM.jpg  

Last edited by BrianL99; Today at 08:13 AM.
  #7  
Unread Today, 08:38 AM
Sit U 8 Sit U 8 is offline
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
"The water loss also caused a 24-year-old, 48-inch metal stormwater pipe to collapse after it lost the water pressure that supported it, the report says."


Odd design.
For sure.
Wonder what material it was?
  #8  
Unread Today, 10:13 AM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 5,756
Thanks: 327
Thanked 4,697 Times in 2,005 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sit U 8 View Post
For sure.
Wonder what material it was?
It was described as a "24 year old metal pipe". Used in that application, one would assume it CMP (Corrugated Metal Pipe) ... which is the typical drainage pipe you see, with the circular reinforcement around it.

That metal drain pipe comes in at least 3 variations. Uncoated Galvanized CMP, Aluminized Type 2 CMP & Polymer-coated CMP.

The next step up in common usage, would be Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) or HDPE stormwater pipe, the last 2 have a service lifetime or 75+ years.

I've never heard of a 48" pipe being "supported by water pressure" as described in the Newspaper report. While water pressure provides some structural integrity if constant, it's hard to believe that was its source of support. Who knows? I'm not an engineer, but I've installed or had installed, 1000's of feet of drain pipe.
  #9  
Unread Today, 01:59 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Diamond Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 18,212
Thanks: 9,280
Thanked 7,558 Times in 4,031 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
I'm still trying to figure out what created pressure inside a stormwater pipe. If it was simply gravity-fed into the ponds then there was no pressure in the pipe at all.

Perhaps the loss of water revealed that the pipe had collapsed.

It would be even more suspicious if the sinkhole was adjacent to the collapsed pipe.

Pressure from the weight of the water above transfer CMP. Just like a water tower, anything lower than tower storage has pressure in it.
  #10  
Unread Today, 02:11 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Diamond Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 18,212
Thanks: 9,280
Thanked 7,558 Times in 4,031 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
It lasted until there was a catastrophic failure. There are really only 2 reasons for spontaneous catastrophic failures ... poor design or poor installation.

Typical design lifetime of municipal drainage systems, is 50-100 years.

CMP pipe is not designed to be "supported by water pressure" and the expected service life of properly installed CMP, is closer to 50 years than 24 years. If it was Type 2 CMP, closer to 75 years.

If the newspaper reporting is accurate, a more appropriate engineering spec might have been RCP or another alternative. Of course, CMP is one of the cheapest options & you usually get what you pay for.

IMO failures will happen where ever CMP used as storm water transfer pipes submerged under weight ponds. District 4 has two classic examples. Failures seems to be on around 25 year cycle based on failures so far.

“AI”piping used in Florida

(“ Yes, Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) can be used for underwater water-transfer culverts in Florida, provided it is restricted to non-pressurized gravity flow and uses corrosion-resistant materials. “Standard galvanized steel CMP is generally avoided”. in submerged Florida environments due to rapid rusting, whereas Corrugated Aluminum Pipe (CAP) and polymer-coated steel are widely approved for freshwater, brackish, and saltwater applications.

Key Requirements & Restrictions

Whether CMP is allowed and how it must be built depends heavily on the type of water, pressure, and permitting agency:
• Gravity Flow Only. CMP is designed for open-channel stormwater drainage, pond interconnects, and tidal equalization culverts. It cannot hold internal water pressure and is strictly prohibited for pressurized potable water mains, force mains, or pumped transfer lines.
• Material Selection for Florida Waters. Florida's high water tables, acidic soils, and coastal saltwater severely shorten the lifespan of standard zinc-galvanized steel. For submerged installations, engineers typically specify Aluminum Alloy (such as CORLIX) or Polymer-Coated / Aluminized Steel Type 2 (ALT2) to achieve a 50- to 75-year service life.
• Watertight Joints. Standard culvert bands allow soil infiltration and exfiltration. Underwater transfer pipes require watertight gasketed coupling bands (such as O-ring or hugger bands with neoprene gaskets) to prevent sediment from washing into the pipe and causing sinkholes above the trench.
• Buoyancy & Anchoring. Because empty or partially full CMP has high buoyancy when submerged, installations below the water table require sufficient backfill cover, concrete headwalls, or anti-flotation collars so the pipe does not float out of alignment.”)
  #11  
Unread Today, 02:27 PM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 5,756
Thanks: 327
Thanked 4,697 Times in 2,005 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspinmo View Post
Pressure from the weight of the water above transfer CMP. Just like a water tower, anything lower than tower storage has pressure in it.
According to the newspaper source (which is the only information I have), the pipe is typically full of water, which would under normal circumstances, provide additional structural integrity. The pipe wasn't getting any water, which compromised the structure.

Envision trying to crush full can of soda vs an empty can. The full one is structurally stronger.

CMP is fairly thin and derives much of its strength, from the surrounding soils, compacted around it. Reading what the newspaper wrote, suggests that in this case, the structural integrity of the pipe, was based on it being surrounded by water ... once that changed, the pipe failed.
Reply


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.