Editor's note: WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT

They thought the Iowa Governor’s Conference on LGBTQ Youth was about anti-bullying. Instead, about 1,000 teenagers from more than 100 Iowa communities were treated to a profanity-laced performance by a drag queen along with graphic conversations on oral sex and a transgender tutorial on how to make fake testicles.

The April 3rd conference was sponsored by Iowa Safe Schools, a non-profit group that creates “safe and supportive schools” for LGBTQ young people.

Some parents were furious about some of the sexually explicit comments from paid speakers – including a comedian who told the high school students how “pleasurable it is for gay couples to eat each other’s behinds and how to use different flavors of (oils) to make it taste better.”

Bullying is a terrible thing and it is a very real problem in American public schools – for both gay and straight students. Many of the young people who attended the Iowa Governors Conference on LGBTQ Youth did so because they cared about their classmates. They wanted to learn how to stand in the gap for others.
“We were absolutely flabbergasted,” one father told me. “It was graphic and pornographic. From a parent’s perspective I cannot think of anywhere this should be an acceptable conversation.”

The parent, who agreed to talk with me provided he was not identified, has a teenage daughter who attended the conference. The 18-year-old is a member of her school’s student support group that helps bullied teens.

“She though the conference would give the group better ideas on how to deal with bullying issues,” the parent told me. “But there was hardly anything about that.”

The parent described sessions about where discussions were held on how to clean yourself before anal sex “and the pleasure you can get from eating your partner’s backside.”


Sounds Y-U-M-M-Y!



Teens shocked by graphic content at anti-bullying conference | Fox News

I'm really beginning to agree with those who have said this whole gay rights fight is less about equal rights and non-bullying and all about FORCING acceptance of their lifestyle on everyone. No longer can we agree to disagree; Rather, everyone MUST accept it.

It's a subtle angle: the difference between legal rights and forcing everyone to accept something as normal (and therefore legal).

This is absolutely disgusting. If we don't return to good old traditional morals and values we will destroy our country from within. I also believe as above poster the gay agenda is being forced on us and its perfectly fine to still believe in traditional marriage

Originally Posted by Guest

I'm really beginning to agree with those who have said this whole gay rights fight is less about equal rights and non-bullying and all about FORCING acceptance of their lifestyle on everyone. No longer can we agree to disagree; Rather, everyone MUST accept it.

It's a subtle angle: the difference between legal rights and forcing everyone to accept something as normal (and therefore legal).

The Supreme Court will announce it's decision in June. Same-sex marriage will either be legal in all 50 states or it won't.

Originally Posted by Guest

I'm really beginning to agree with those who have said this whole gay rights fight is less about equal rights and non-bullying and all about FORCING acceptance of their lifestyle on everyone. No longer can we agree to disagree; Rather, everyone MUST accept it.

It's a subtle angle: the difference between legal rights and forcing everyone to accept something as normal (and therefore legal).

As you probably know, there is a sizable LGBT population in The Villages. What would you do if a married gay ot lesbian couple moved in next door to you - and had weekly parties (not wild but exhuberant with several like couples attending)? How receptive would you be to them and their friends?

Originally Posted by Guest

As you probably know, there is a sizable LGBT population in The Villages. What would you do if a married gay ot lesbian couple moved in next door to you - and had weekly parties (not wild but exhuberant with several like couples attending)? How receptive would you be to them and their friends?

You mean like the parties that are commonly held in many, many, MANY villages here?

How do you know it is sizeable.

The extreme prjudice of your post is glaring as it could possibly be.

Ridiculous post.

Some of us and some parents might be shocked but I seriously doubt any of today's youth would be shocked one little bit. Just listen to the music. Just view the games they play. Just view the movies in theatres and on television.
Just view about anything anyone could imagine on the internet.

Sorry folks. We cannot have the permissiveness we have degenerated to allowing and have the moral values of yesterday at the same time.

It may sound good to some. But we all know there is nothing including maurder, rape and mayhem that would shock not only our teens but most of their parents.

We are a much degenerated moral people than we were when we grew up.
Today's values are frankly disgusting.

Originally Posted by Guest

As you probably know, there is a sizable LGBT population in The Villages. What would you do if a married gay ot lesbian couple moved in next door to you - and had weekly parties (not wild but exhuberant with several like couples attending)? How receptive would you be to them and their friends?

I have a number of gay friends and I imagine as long as they weren't "militant" in forcing me to accept their lifestyle we'd all live happily ever after.

It's the 'IN YOUR FACE" gay pride parade attitude where participants wear nothing but a rainbow colored "pouch" over their genitals all the while screaming, "GAY PRIDE!" that's offensive, at least to me personally.

Teaching high school children about the joys of eating another man's sweaty "backside" is similar to a gay pride parade in its "in your face" forced acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle.

Originally Posted by Guest

You mean like the parties that are commonly held in many, many, MANY villages here?

How do you know it is sizeable.

The extreme prjudice of your post is glaring as it could possibly be.

Ridiculous post.

Deflecting the question is a Alinski tactic that is in the liberal playbook - according to so many conservatives on different posts.

The question was. "What would you do if a married gay couple moved in next door to you?" Would you accept them as neighbors or would you shun them? Would you invite them to social functions with you or shun them?

No prejudice on my part. Just asking a question. Man up and tell us the truth as to what your reaction would be.

Originally Posted by Guest

Deflecting the question is a Alinski tactic that is in the liberal playbook - according to so many conservatives on different posts.

The question was. "What would you do if a married gay couple moved in next door to you?" Would you accept them as neighbors or would you shun them? Would you invite them to social functions with you or shun them?

No prejudice on my part. Just asking a question. Man up and tell us the truth as to what your reaction would be.

Have had several gay and lesbian couples as neighbors in TV since I moved here almost 15 years ago. They were always treated exactly the same as any other couple.

Originally Posted by Guest

As you probably know, there is a sizable LGBT population in The Villages. What would you do if a married gay ot lesbian couple moved in next door to you - and had weekly parties (not wild but exhuberant with several like couples attending)? How receptive would you be to them and their friends?

100% respective. Any other answer would be horrible.

Originally Posted by Guest

Deflecting the question is a Alinski tactic that is in the liberal playbook - according to so many conservatives on different posts.

The question was. "What would you do if a married gay couple moved in next door to you?" Would you accept them as neighbors or would you shun them? Would you invite them to social functions with you or shun them?

No prejudice on my part. Just asking a question. Man up and tell us the truth as to what your reaction would be.

Why would anybody ask that in the first place? Are there any others we should be asking about as well?
I am amused by the notion of "acceptance" being insisted upon.

A waste of keystrokes.
Sorta like asking if one still beats their wives.....it is a trick question.
No deflection intended. Just challenging. Remember that right we all still have, regardless what some would like.

Originally Posted by Guest

Why would anybody ask that in the first place? Are there any others we should be asking about as well?
I am amused by the notion of "acceptance" being insisted upon.

A waste of keystrokes.
Sorta like asking if one still beats their wives.....it is a trick question.
No deflection intended. Just challenging. Remember that right we all still have, regardless what some would like.

No trick question- just wanted your honest answer - but your refusal to give an answer leads one to think you would not accept a gay married couple as good neighbors. If you want to include any other group of people, go right ahead, but I would think any thought of not accepting any group of people is not consistent with being in the 21st century.

You are amused at being told gays should be accepted as equal to everyone else? I pity you. Don't forget that Dick Cheney has a gay daughter. Even he accepted it.

Originally Posted by Guest

No trick question- just wanted your honest answer - but your refusal to give an answer leads one to think you would not accept a gay married couple as good neighbors. If you want to include any other group of people, go right ahead, but I would think any thought of not accepting any group of people is not consistent with being in the 21st century.

You are amused at being told gays should be accepted as equal to everyone else? I pity you. Don't forget that Dick Cheney has a gay daughter. Even he accepted it.

You forgot something also. Your question did not stop at having gay neighbors. You added " and had weekly parties (not wild but exhuberant with several like couples attending)? "

That addition changes the question quite a bit.

Originally Posted by Guest

You forgot something also. Your question did not stop at having gay neighbors. You added " and had weekly parties (not wild but exhuberant with several like couples attending)? "

That addition changes the question quite a bit.

I did forget that. Let's say the parties were attended by up to 4 couples and also you and spouse were invited to some. Would you go?