From AOL just now;

Clinton got now-classified Benghazi info on private email - AOL.com

Plus I think she has a terrible temper and I think she is vindictive as only a woman can be. I say this because I am a woman.

Originally Posted by Guest

From AOL just now;

Clinton got now-classified Benghazi info on private email - AOL.com

Plus I think she has a terrible temper and I think she is vindictive as only a woman can be. I say this because I am a woman.

If you really feel that way and she gets the nomination, you have the option to not vote for her. That is your constitutional right if you are registered to vote.

What i dont understand is why the h--- doesnt obama our wonderful administrator ( wont call him the president) do something about the mess we are in with this ISIS. Yes I think the USgovernment helped in creating this but now lets do something. Eliminate them. Yes Hillary is not to be trusted hopefully she withdraws from running for president.

Why not? You must not be blind indoctrinated liberal sheep. She class act just like her husband. prefect example of democrat! What's not to like?

As you recall Bill Clinton would not admit, even under oath that he has sexual relations with that woman, Ms Lewinsky, until he was boxed in. I offer this refresher because it illustrates how these two attorney trained couple have used their education and experiences to dodge their critics. Hillary was on the legal staff that went after Nixon and learned all the nuances of deflecting the truth. The allegations made against Hillary concerning Benghazi, her personal e-mail server and the Clinton Foundation all ring true.

Its obvious the clintons will maintain a low profile until the storm blows over. It is sad that many voters/press will confuse their loyalty, dislike of the other side or adoration for this couple and let them make fools of us all but the Democratic Party has a habit of saying over and over again about their favor pols "Yea s/he is a crook but s/he is our crook


Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

If you really feel that way and she gets the nomination, you have the option to not vote for her. That is your constitutional right if you are registered to vote.

Sad thing is, the vast majority of Americans do not trust her at all, however, despite that she will get the nomination and stand a very good chance of winning.

What does that say about the Democratic Party and the sheep who will be sent out to vote for her (see George Soros, etc.). She is EVERYTHING the democrats oppose, has tons of skeletons in her closet, has proven very worthy of not being trusted.

To me, it is quite the indictment of that party.

A flippant remark as was made about the option on the vote, I assume with full knowledge of the Soros setup, is just....well, flippant, unaware of the serious difficulties facing this country, and I can only hope that some will wake up and begin to see why the distrust.

Imagine.....most Americans do not TRUST her, but almost all democrats will vote for her. What a crown for that party.

Originally Posted by Guest

From AOL just now;

Clinton got now-classified Benghazi info on private email - AOL.com

Plus I think she has a terrible temper and I think she is vindictive as only a woman can be. I say this because I am a woman.

First off, I don't trust her either. I really think the main reason she's running is .... the ego and sense of entitlement. It's not like she has a genuine vision, other than poll-tested talking points.

But, to the topic of her emails... She had what's called "Sensitive But Unclassified" (SBU) information on her private server. While it's not classified per se, it's just what the marking says "sensitive." In addition, SBU information in the aggregate is in fact considered classified.

Hillary broke a number of laws starting with the Federal Records Act by keeping official government correspondence on non-government systems. After all, she was SecState, the #3 position in the USG Executive Branch by custom. There is ZERO doubt that she broke the law and she knew it. But, by hiding behind a shyster interpretation, and operating off her notion that laws are for the little people, (not the Clintons) she did it anyway.

Ask yourself why would anyone go to the trouble? Answer, to make sure incriminating information could be reliably destroyed when needed. Which is what she did a few months ago. It's obvious what she wanted destroyed ... any/all links to the Clinton Foundation, and in effect selling influence while SecState. Her net worth has rocketed to $200 Million … that’s a veritable fortune. Does anyone think hers or Bill’s speeches are that good? It’s obviously selling access, in advance, to when she is (hopefully not) elected POTUS.

If we had a genuine watchdog media, this would be Watergate on steroids. I'm sure there are all kinds of leads and trails in the emails. They're still out there (ie the people that received them) but it will take work to sniff it out.

Originally Posted by Guest

From AOL just now;

Clinton got now-classified Benghazi info on private email - AOL.com

Plus I think she has a terrible temper and I think she is vindictive as only a woman can be. I say this because I am a woman.

As another free thinking woman, not to be confused with those who feel they must shut off their brains and cast aside their moral code to vote for someone just because they are female, I am with you 100% on that assessment!

These Benghazi emails will do as much damage to Hillary Clinton in 2016 as they did to Barack Obama in 2012, none.

Originally Posted by Guest

These Benghazi emails will do as much damage to Hillary Clinton in 2016 as they did to Barack Obama in 2012, none.

SHE was directly involved.....she was and is still directly responsible. She is the one who has a laundry list of other very visible issues that speak loudly to lack of trust warranted...........like Obama currently has as well.

Originally Posted by Guest

These Benghazi emails will do as much damage to Hillary Clinton in 2016 as they did to Barack Obama in 2012, none.

You are absolutely correct in my opinion.

I think THAT fact is an indictment of the Democratic party frankly. To "coronate" someone who is openly not trusted by a large majority of the american people is just a bit out of line to me.

It is also an indictment of our media and frankly the voters who will rush out to vote for her for all the wrong reasons.

She is annointed and she knows it. She stands for nothing even close to the Democratic parties manifested goals and objective, BUT they will turn out and vote for her.

I thought of how they will get out the votes today as I was reading about the groups protesting that they did not get their pay for protesting in Ferguson.

Funny if it were not so sad !!!

Ferguson 'Protesters' Are Now Protesting That They Didn't Get Paid - Investors.com

That has NOTHING to do with Ms Clinton, but does speak volumes to the character of the party !!

Since we are talking about the Ferguson protesters, I wanted to point out that the Indian long grain rough price right now is about $9.15 per cwt. The Chinese price is at $19.79 per cwt. and the North Arkansas bid is around $9.55 per cwt., as I write this. By the way, the price of rice in Brazil is about $12.65 per cwt. and $12.75 in Thailand. Other than India, the United States has the lowest priced long grain rough rice in the world right now.

Originally Posted by Guest

Since we are talking about the Ferguson protesters, I wanted to point out that the Indian long grain rough price right now is about $9.15 per cwt. The Chinese price is at $19.79 per cwt. and the North Arkansas bid is around $9.55 per cwt., as I write this. By the way, the price of rice in Brazil is about $12.65 per cwt. and $12.75 in Thailand. Other than India, the United States has the lowest priced long grain rough rice in the world right now.

Thank you for the long grain rice pricing. I will start to follow this on the CBOTstarting Tuesday,and thanks for one of the better informative posts.

Originally Posted by Chi-Town

Thank you for the long grain rice pricing. I will start to follow this on the CBOTstarting Tuesday,and thanks for one of the better informative posts.

CORRECT. a post like that tells you quite a bit about the poster, doesn't it ?

If you know nothing about the subject being discussed, then play the fool and go for a laugh !! Met many of these over the years !

As another woman I agree she is just another Obama. I can't think of a single achievement she has accomplished as secretary of state? Also Benghazi was enough for me not to mention the email scandals our nations security is more important than gay or women's rights. Maybe she could help woman in the middle east since they have no rights at allowed