I don't understand why Gay fed judges are allowed to rule on gay marriages ruling. Is the law suppose to no conflict of interest? The current ruling full of gay judges. No wonder it passed. This has be set up every since the Clinton presidenticy. Even the lower districts are full of gay judges. IMO No Supreme Court judges should be made for life. IMO also there needed to be age limit. Couple need to be in nursing homes IMO. All judges should be voted in by the people. That way if they rule against the masses they can be voted out. But the lawyer system based on I get paid regardless. Lawyer welfare isn't it?

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't understand why Gay fed judges are allowed to rule on gay marriages ruling. Is the law suppose to no conflict of interest? The current ruling full of gay judges. No wonder it passed. This has be set up every since the Clinton presidenticy. Even the lower districts are full of gay judges. IMO No Supreme Court judges should be made for life. IMO also there needed to be age limit. Couple need to be in nursing homes IMO. All judges should be voted in by the people. That way if they rule against the masses they can be voted out. But the lawyer system based on I get paid regardless. Lawyer welfare isn't it?

Ok just who is the gay judge on the Supreme Court? None that I know of and this court is NOT liberal by any means.

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't understand why Gay fed judges are allowed to rule on gay marriages ruling. Is the law suppose to no conflict of interest? The current ruling full of gay judges. No wonder it passed. This has be set up every since the Clinton presidenticy. Even the lower districts are full of gay judges. IMO No Supreme Court judges should be made for life. IMO also there needed to be age limit. Couple need to be in nursing homes IMO. All judges should be voted in by the people. That way if they rule against the masses they can be voted out. But the lawyer system based on I get paid regardless. Lawyer welfare isn't it?

Wow, you are not only wrong on the issues, But homophobic as well. You know that it has been theorized that many, if not most homophobes, actually are repressing homosexual desires. Personal best regards.

- - - l -

Originally Posted by Guest

Wow, you are not only wrong on the issues, But homophobic as well. You know that it has been theorized that many, if not most homophobes, actually are repressing homosexual desires. Personal best regards.

Great Post!!!

That's the basics of the liberals and there agenda! Homophobic and Theories.

Originally Posted by Guest

Wow, you are not only wrong on the issues, But homophobic as well. You know that it has been theorized that many, if not most homophobes, actually are repressing homosexual desires. Personal best regards.

Gay judge and getting choked, or on lawyer welfare

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't understand why Gay fed judges are allowed to rule on gay marriages ruling. Is the law suppose to no conflict of interest? The current ruling full of gay judges. No wonder it passed. This has be set up every since the Clinton presidenticy. Even the lower districts are full of gay judges. IMO No Supreme Court judges should be made for life. IMO also there needed to be age limit. Couple need to be in nursing homes IMO. All judges should be voted in by the people. That way if they rule against the masses they can be voted out. But the lawyer system based on I get paid regardless. Lawyer welfare isn't it?

Leading contender for the most asinine post of the day ... and that takes a LOT on this forum

that's like saying married judges can't rule on divorce decrees---puh leese

that's like saying married judges can't be allowed to rule on divorce cases, or single judges can't rule either

what the heck is lawyer welfare?

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't understand why Gay fed judges are allowed to rule on gay marriages ruling. Is the law suppose to no conflict of interest? The current ruling full of gay judges. No wonder it passed. This has be set up every since the Clinton presidenticy. Even the lower districts are full of gay judges. IMO No Supreme Court judges should be made for life. IMO also there needed to be age limit. Couple need to be in nursing homes IMO. All judges should be voted in by the people. That way if they rule against the masses they can be voted out. But the lawyer system based on I get paid regardless. Lawyer welfare isn't it?

Perhaps you should take a class to learn to read. Start with the US Constitution.

An anus and an *******?
An anus would never say what you did.

Originally Posted by Guest

An anus and an *******?
An anus would never say what you did.

I believe the aminisitration and the moderators have allowed this forum to deteriorate to an unacceptable level.

You do know who each of us are and I urge you to warn those who are intent on continuing to purposely degrade this site and they have others in the past.

And if they continue, then ban them as you have in the past.

I do not think any of us want to allow to have the pleasure of shutting this forum down.

I know by opting in we agree to self police the forum.
A brief review of the past week alone will surely demonstrate that does not work.

I for one will go into to the self ignore mode. Too many of us have wasted our time trying to get the couple of antagonizers to recognize others opinions. Not change theirs at all. Just to remain civil and stop the lower than school yaed level taunting that they relish!

Originally Posted by Guest

I believe the aminisitration and the moderators have allowed this forum to deteriorate to an unacceptable level.

You do know who each of us are and I urge you to warn those who are intent on continuing to purposely degrade this site and they have others in the past.

And if they continue, then ban them as you have in the past.

I do not think any of us want to allow to have the pleasure of shutting this forum down.

I know by opting in we agree to self police the forum.
A brief review of the past week alone will surely demonstrate that does not work.

I for one will go into to the self ignore mode. Too many of us have wasted our time trying to get the couple of antagonizers to recognize others opinions. Not change theirs at all. Just to remain civil and stop the lower than school yaed level taunting that they relish!

Dear Guest: I disagree and it is why I am addressing you as guest because it served as a means of not identifying anyone and why I end my post with Personal Best Regards: which by the way was hijacked by one of those deteriorating posters . Further there is no personal message or editing available. I suggest that if you are offended then please don't log onto this forum or skip over what offends you and better yet respond civilly to their uncivil rants and deny them their cheap thrill

Personal Best Regards: