According to the Fox News website, President Obama has the Democrat number to make the Iran Nuclear Deal veto-proof.


Chalk up another win for President Obama.

And the majority of we the people lose another one.

I guess a black presidents to do and "I" did list is a much higher priority.

Shame on all the congressional lemmings who rolled over. The quis quo pros are also a higher priority than we the people.

End result? America and the world are much less safe. America takes another step backwards in stature, out foxed by terrorist criminals and a radical, arrogant, incompetent president.

It was a foregone conclusion. Just like the ACA, there were complaints but no alternative.

A bad deal is NOT better than NO deal. Too bad that liberals only see black on all issues that require some form of action or decision, when the option does not have to be just black or white, but could also include several shades of gray. To liberals, the ONLY alternative is the lie that the left keeps trying to convince us, that if not THAT deal, then war. Not even close to the truth. You don't have to have to have a degree in foreign policy to understand this. On the other hand, we are dealing with way too many liberals, that do not understand the terms compromise, negotiate or investigate.

Originally Posted by Guest

On the other hand, we are dealing with way too many liberals, that do not understand the terms compromise, negotiate or investigate.

We have too many liberals? The majority of voters elected Pres. Obama. Majority rules!

Liberals do not know compromise? Horse hockey! Don't forget that the Republicans have tried to deny just about all of the ideas of the President and the nickname for Republicans is "G'Noper".

OK, so no deal. Iran is then free to to proceed unabated to develop a nuclear weapon. And don't worry, China and Russia will be more than happy to fill in economically. Of course, there is always war.

Originally Posted by Guest

OK, so no deal. Iran is then free to to proceed unabated to develop a nuclear weapon. And don't worry, China and Russia will be more than happy to fill in economically. Of course, there is always war.

Where did you get that idea? When we had sanctions on them, it made it harder for them to build a nuke. Now, they won't even have to worry about building one, because they will have their money released to them and they will be able to buy one from Russia. Now, they have arranged it so that they get to do their own inspections of military sites, and the IAEA have to give them 24 days notice/warning before inspecting.

No, this was a bad deal, made by idiots that didn't know squat about negotiating. This is one time they should have had Trump on their team, but they had a treasonous anti-war coward instead.

Originally Posted by Guest

Where did you get that idea? When we had sanctions on them, it made it harder for them to build a nuke. Now, they won't even have to worry about building one, because they will have their money released to them and they will be able to buy one from Russia. Now, they have arranged it so that they get to do their own inspections of military sites, and the IAEA have to give them 24 days notice/warning before inspecting.

No, this was a bad deal, made by idiots that didn't know squat about negotiating. This is one time they should have had Trump on their team, but they had a treasonous anti-war coward instead.

One factor that shouldn't be ignored is Israeli determination. They took out Iraq's nuclear reactor in 1981 (Operation Opera) and Syria's nuclear reactor in 2007 (Operation Orchard). I have a feeling that there is an Operation name for Iran also.

Originally Posted by Guest

One factor that shouldn't be ignored is Israeli determination. They took out Iraq's nuclear reactor in 1981 (Operation Opera) and Syria's nuclear reactor in 2007 (Operation Orchard). I have a feeling that there is an Operation name for Iran also.

It wouldn't break my heart if Israel bombed'em. They've(Iran) been a thorn in our flesh for a long time. Sooner is better than later, though.

Get off the liberal rant. Not all liberals think this is a good deal, let alone one that should have ever been negotiated. Believe it or not, some of us are just as scared as the conservatives. Intelligence and common sense do not just belong to one side or the other.

Originally Posted by Guest

We have too many liberals? The majority of voters elected Pres. Obama. Majority rules!

Liberals do not know compromise? Horse hockey! Don't forget that the Republicans have tried to deny just about all of the ideas of the President and the nickname for Republicans is "G'Noper".

Republicans merely attempted to stop the transition of our FREE nation to socialism. The president never had a good idea. They did exactly what we elected them to do and I am glad they listened some of the time. Obama was a criminal drug abuser prior to his being elected and if not for being elected, he would never have qualified for a security clearance. I call it irony. To tell you the truth, I thought he would have done more damage to the country than he did. Thank goodness the economy bounced back in spite of him and his stupid cronies, Reid and Pelosi. Hopefully, the Republican controlled congress can keep Obama under control until he vacates the White House.

Originally Posted by Guest

Get off the liberal rant. Not all liberals think this is a good deal, let alone one that should have ever been negotiated. Believe it or not, some of us are just as scared as the conservatives. Intelligence and common sense do not just belong to one side or the other.

Prove it....

Originally Posted by Guest

We have too many liberals? The majority of voters elected Pres. Obama. Majority rules!

Liberals do not know compromise? Horse hockey! Don't forget that the Republicans have tried to deny just about all of the ideas of the President and the nickname for Republicans is "G'Noper".

BS.
What do you call yourself when you do not accept a deal....in personal life....stop looking for the political potential as there is none.

We are OK in your book if we agree, go along, play dead and do not give an opposing position. If we do anything other than say yes or the preceding we qualify only for the name calling.

But does that mean you name callers never ever reject anything?
Are you like the baby birds in the nest with their mouths open wide just waiting for your powers that be to drop something in?

I will close the same way I started.....BS!

Originally Posted by Guest

BS.
What do you call yourself when you do not accept a deal....in personal life....stop looking for the political potential as there is none.

We are OK in your book if we agree, go along, play dead and do not give an opposing position. If we do anything other than say yes or the preceding we qualify only for the name calling.

But does that mean you name callers never ever reject anything?
Are you like the baby birds in the nest with their mouths open wide just waiting for your powers that be to drop something in?

I will close the same way I started.....BS!

Originally Posted by Guest

Republicans merely attempted to stop the transition of our FREE nation to socialism. The president never had a good idea. They did exactly what we elected them to do and I am glad they listened some of the time. Obama was a criminal drug abuser prior to his being elected and if not for being elected, he would never have qualified for a security clearance. I call it irony. To tell you the truth, I thought he would have done more damage to the country than he did. Thank goodness the economy bounced back in spite of him and his stupid cronies, Reid and Pelosi. Hopefully, the Republican controlled congress can keep Obama under control until he vacates the White House.

Here's an Obama conspiracy chart for you.

uploadfromtaptalk1441221225435.jpg