I tried, really tried but last night's democrat debate was just so sickening that I was about to gag.

Sanders was so adamant about his socialism that spittle was flying as he shouted. Remember the old Nazi films where Hitler was shouting and everyone in the audience threw up their arms and yelled "Heil"?

Hilary was in her element and was very well prepared. She shrugged off questions about her email blaming a Republican conspiracy, even when she was told that the FBI was investigating and Obama agreed that something needed to be done about the incident.

O'Malley was on the floor kissing Hilary's posterior and would jump up in the air to make a comment with bright eyes, every once in a while. His declaring Baltimore an improved city was just too much. He really seemed to believe it. He had a the craziest of grins on his face.

Chafee bobbed and threw his arms up, appearing like a large bird courting his mate. He always looked at Hilary as if asking permission to speak.

The only one that did not appear to be kissing Hilary's behind was Webb, who had to fight to get a chance to speak. And even then, they kept cutting him off at exactly 30 seconds, when others would drone on for minutes.

Hilary was cackling up a storm, reminiscent of Oz's wicked witch of the West. She was already Queen Hilary and her subjects were fighting to kiss her ring, or other.

They all felt that the wealthy weren't paying their fair share. Sanders had a new tax level he wants to impose on the rich. He also wants to penalize anyone on Wall St and make them pay for free college for everyone. He also wants Medicare for everyone (free). I thought it interesting when the moderator mentioned Sander's spending his honeymoon in the Soviet Union. He must have been in socialist heaven. Sanders also said that even though he was a draft dodger during Vietnam, he would make a good Commander-in-chief (and didn't mind sending other kids to war). He doesn't like banks and thinks they should be dismantled and broken into smaller banks.

Hilary believes we should go back to policies of her husband, which were instrumental in causing the recession, such as Dodd-Frank. It appears that everyone else at the debate felt the same way. After all, it was Bush's fault, as their mantra went, not Democrat policies. When Hilary was asked about her millions, she shrugged it off and informed everyone that she came from a poor family and worked hard for her money, and that everyone should have the same opportunity she had....blah, blah, blah.

They all felt that lots of gov jobs would improve the economy, paid for by the wealthy. Sanders was very adamant about rich people having too much money to spend, so they should share it. Sanders said big business should be broken up and dismantled because they were too powerful and rich. Hilary was cautious about that comment and mentioned that we needed to protect small mom and pop businesses.

Their foreign policy was let the Middle East implode/explode and talk harshly to Putin. When confronted with the fact that they endorsed the Iraqi war, they attempted to sidetrack it as best they could.

Sanders agreed with Obama that Global climate change was most dangerous to national security. Hilary said she hadn't made a decision on Keystone until she made a decision. Meaning, you can't hold me to any opinion.

Hilary felt that Republicans were the most dangerous to national security.

They were all anti-NRA except Webb. And bragged about their low NRA ratings.
They were all anti-law enforcement, blaming all criminal thug killings on over aggressive cops.
They were all for "black lives matter" and when asked if it should be "all lives matter" or "black lives matter" they were very adamant that it has to be "black lives matter." Sanders equated today's treatment of blacks with the '50's. He obviously lives in a world of his own. He said he was for affirmative action for BLACKS ONLY.

Debbie Whatshername was sitting in the front row of the audience and reminded me of Pelosi getting all excited when Obama would speak in congress. Debbie was clapping and smiling hysterically every time Hilary spoke, looking like something from a cheap horror movie.

I have to give the moderators credit. They asked some decent questions. It was not their fault if the master debaters refused to answer and diverted. Seems to be a liberal trend. I believe we are seeing the Democrat's worst representatives. The only worst one that was missing from the group was former Rep Alan Grayson.

Rather than continue to watch the Democrat Circus of Horrors, I switched channels to watch another comedy. The Democrat comedy was not funny at all when one realized that grown adults actually believed the stuff spewing from these candidates' mouths. So pathetic.

You really should have watched the entire debate. After all, the next President of the United States was on the stage.

Thanks for the wrap-up. I tried to watch it, really I did, but just like Obama's speeches, it put me right to sleep. Nothing but a bunch of phony politicians saying whatever might get them elected. Twisting and turning their viewpoints on a dime, Hillary being the master of them all where that's concerned.

Give me a real person who loves this country more than self and can lead (operative word here being lead) this country out of the ditch we've been pulled into - apparently that doesn't exist in the Democrat Party. I actually kind of felt sorry for them that this is apparently the best they have to offer.

Originally Posted by Guest

You really should have watched the entire debate. After all, the next President of the United States was on the stage.

Clinton's PERFORMANCE in no way takes away all the bad that she represents....dishonest as ever in some of her remarks....arrogant by ignoring some......unethical going in and coming out.....and still lying.....

So they did a better job of dressing her up, so she did not look like a prison guard matron; fixed her hair for a change; and boy she must have spent a fortune for the make up and face lifts.

But when all gets said and done she is what she is...unethical...untrustworthy...lying....devious. ...self indulged hypocrite.

I must agree the choices are not good for dems unless they choose to cross party lines....and if Clinton should get the nomination, I predict that will happen.

She does not represent the American woman in any manner what so ever....other than the facr she is one.

Originally Posted by Guest

You really should have watched the entire debate. After all, the next President of the United States was on the stage.

I did not watch the debate until I watched the debate.

Originally Posted by Guest

Thanks for the wrap-up. I tried to watch it, really I did, but just like Obama's speeches, it put me right to sleep. Nothing but a bunch of phony politicians saying whatever might get them elected. Twisting and turning their viewpoints on a dime, Hillary being the master of them all where that's concerned.

Give me a real person who loves this country more than self and can lead (operative word here being lead) this country out of the ditch we've been pulled into - apparently that doesn't exist in the Democrat Party. I actually kind of felt sorry for them that this is apparently the best they have to offer.

Real person who loves country more than self, like Donald Trump? Or perhaps the clueless wonder Ben Carson.

Get ready to enjoy another 8 years of a Democrat in the White House.

INTERESTING read on how the Obama campaign saw Ms Clnton during the 2008 primary and how they saw the way to defeat her. Not much has changed it would appear...

"And while it’s true that Obama had a superior organization and an optimistic message, the real beginning of the end for Hillary Clinton was when Obama attacked her greatest vulnerability: her character."

Part of the internal memo on how to beat her....

"“Change you can believe in” was intended to frame the argument along the character fault line, and this is where we can and must win this fight. We cannot let Clinton especially blur the lines on who is the genuine agent of change in this election.

• The reason Clinton can’t be trusted or believed when it comes to change is that she represents, to a great degree, the three sources of discontent formulated in our premise.

• She’s driven by political calculation not conviction, regularly backing away and shifting positions on issues ranging from war, to Social Security, to trade, to reform.

• She embodies trench warfare vs. Republicans, and is consumed with beating them rather than unifying the country and building consensus to get things done.


• She prides herself on working the system, not changing it—rebuffing reforms on everything from lobbyist donations to budget earmarks.


How to Beat Hillary Clinton - The New Yorker

You sort of wonder why, if he believed all of this that he used to beat her, why in the world he selected her for Secy of State.

Politics as usual !!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Real person who loves country more than self, like Donald Trump? Or perhaps the clueless wonder Ben Carson.

Get ready to enjoy another 8 years of a Democrat in the White House.

Did I mention Trump? As far as the offensive statement directed at the neurosurgeon, Dr. Ben Carson, I'm beginning to think you are a racist.

Originally Posted by Guest

INTERESTING read on how the Obama campaign saw Ms Clnton during the 2008 primary and how they saw the way to defeat her. Not much has changed it would appear...

"And while it’s true that Obama had a superior organization and an optimistic message, the real beginning of the end for Hillary Clinton was when Obama attacked her greatest vulnerability: her character."

Part of the internal memo on how to beat her....

"“Change you can believe in” was intended to frame the argument along the character fault line, and this is where we can and must win this fight. We cannot let Clinton especially blur the lines on who is the genuine agent of change in this election.

• The reason Clinton can’t be trusted or believed when it comes to change is that she represents, to a great degree, the three sources of discontent formulated in our premise.

• She’s driven by political calculation not conviction, regularly backing away and shifting positions on issues ranging from war, to Social Security, to trade, to reform.

• She embodies trench warfare vs. Republicans, and is consumed with beating them rather than unifying the country and building consensus to get things done.


• She prides herself on working the system, not changing it—rebuffing reforms on everything from lobbyist donations to budget earmarks.


How to Beat Hillary Clinton - The New Yorker

You sort of wonder why, if he believed all of this that he used to beat her, why in the world he selected her for Secy of State.

Politics as usual !!!

bee-eye-en-gee-oh!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Thanks for the wrap-up. I tried to watch it, really I did, but just like Obama's speeches, it put me right to sleep. Nothing but a bunch of phony politicians saying whatever might get them elected. Twisting and turning their viewpoints on a dime, Hillary being the master of them all where that's concerned.

Give me a real person who loves this country more than self and can lead (operative word here being lead) this country out of the ditch we've been pulled into - apparently that doesn't exist in the Democrat Party. I actually kind of felt sorry for them that this is apparently the best they have to offer.

Originally Posted by Guest

Clinton's PERFORMANCE in no way takes away all the bad that she represents....dishonest as ever in some of her remarks....arrogant by ignoring some......unethical going in and coming out.....and still lying.....

So they did a better job of dressing her up, so she did not look like a prison guard matron; fixed her hair for a change; and boy she must have spent a fortune for the make up and face lifts.

But when all gets said and done she is what she is...unethical...untrustworthy...lying....devious. ...self indulged hypocrite.

I must agree the choices are not good for dems unless they choose to cross party lines....and if Clinton should get the nomination, I predict that will happen.

She does not represent the American woman in any manner what so ever....other than the facr she is one.

Originally Posted by Guest

Did I mention Trump? As far as the offensive statement directed at the neurosurgeon, Dr. Ben Carson, I'm beginning to think you are a racist.

It appeared that HRC was given the sum and substance of the questions beforehand. Her answers were at best, robotic and rehearsed. She started to talk without hesitation as if the "debate" was totally prearranged. There was absolutely NO debate. This was a show put on by CNN. Where was the back and forth? Where were the hardball questions? Were these people really candidates or panderers?

Not one idea to restore America's greatness was presented. We were spoon fed a load of Dem crap. primarily from a jovial bunch of backslappers who had no clue as to what this country needs. Which is a spine and a respected leader.

I especially liked Clinton's comment about the pipeline...."...I didn't take a positio until I took a position..." She could almost not laugh.

And when accused of flip flopping she preferred to call it as she became more eduated one can change their position.

Very legal. Very Bullshi*y. Very Clinton.

All the dems want to rant and cheer that she won the debate. Not if one was looking for credibility she didn't!

Very phony person, phony looks and phony content. Ya can't make one into what it is not!!