Clinton announces plan to battle Alzheimer's - Yahoo News

What she failed to do was give any indication where the money will come from.

She is the poater child for say anything...true or not....do-able or not....to get the vote.

She like all the rest of the give away crowd know full well the number of those who pay into the system is dwindling......with the open border policy the ranks of those who need the hand outs will at some point overwhelm those who do contribute to the tax system.

So to be promising a cure by 2025? Really? Based on what Clinton?

Quadruple the current funding? Money to come from where?

No continuity!
No sense!

An embarassment to any American that can put two sentences together.

PHONY!!!!!

Don't you mean pollutes the waters that fish swim in.

Is this any different than Trump promising to deport all illegal's currently in U.S.??

Originally Posted by Guest

Is this any different than Trump promising to deport all illegal's currently in U.S.??

It's been done before. And it would save the taxpayer a lot of money over time. Liberals are scared because it will eliminate low wage jobs and a new voter base. A lose-lose situation for the Dems.

Don't you mean, Clinton fishes in Rio Grande???

Originally Posted by Guest

Is this any different than Trump promising to deport all illegal's currently in U.S.??

If you don't see/sense a difference between the two then there is no sense going much further......you obviously missed the point......

You can lead a liberal to the truth, but you can't make them THINK !

Originally Posted by Guest

Clinton announces plan to battle Alzheimer's - Yahoo News

What she failed to do was give any indication where the money will come from.

She is the poater child for say anything...true or not....do-able or not....to get the vote.

She like all the rest of the give away crowd know full well the number of those who pay into the system is dwindling......with the open border policy the ranks of those who need the hand outs will at some point overwhelm those who do contribute to the tax system.

So to be promising a cure by 2025? Really? Based on what Clinton?

Quadruple the current funding? Money to come from where?

No continuity!
No sense!

An embarassment to any American that can put two sentences together.

PHONY!!!!!

Yes, kind of like Bush going into Middle East 13 years ago and not paying a damn cent for it so far. The amount she quoted, although I agree is not paid for, is not even a **** hole in a snow back compared to the war and budget Republicans approved last week. It is not tax payerson the hook it is future tax payers, big difference.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, kind of like Bush going into Middle East 13 years ago and not paying a damn cent for it so far. The amount she quoted, although I agree is not paid for, is not even a **** hole in a snow back compared to the war and budget Republicans approved last week. It is not tax payerson the hook it is future tax payers, big difference.

What the does that have to do with the post at hand?

There is nothing to worry about the future tax payers as they will be the ever dwindling class of AMERICANS. With the open border support and give aways and the much more prolific breeding immigrants there will be fewer and fewer real working tax payers....ultimately unable to support all the free loader programs.....moving the AMerica we used to know toward real socialism......with a hell of a lot less to dispense among all those with their hands out.

Do you remember the speech that Bush Sr. said about a One government world. It's rapidly coming. Socialism.

Sorry it was new world order speech

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, kind of like Bush going into Middle East 13 years ago and not paying a damn cent for it so far. The amount she quoted, although I agree is not paid for, is not even a **** hole in a snow back compared to the war and budget Republicans approved last week. It is not tax payerson the hook it is future tax payers, big difference.

You sure have that information skewed. Republicans approved? Do you think there would be a budget or that the gov would not have shut down if they didn't do what Obummer wanted? He threatened to veto anything that didn't give him his way. He is a despicable piece of nasty stuff that you don't even want to touch to scrape off your shoe. And he dictated what congress would be allowed to pass. Blame the tyrant, not congress. Another reason to get his ilk out of D.C.

And as far as Bush's war is concerned, it didn't cost as much as Obamacare or the entitlements that the gov pays out every year.

Originally Posted by Guest

And as far as Bush's war is concerned, it didn't cost as much as Obamacare or the entitlements that the gov pays out every year.

That's right! Bush's war cost around 4,500 American lives, tens of thousands mentally and physically scarred for life but who cares since we Republicans can bitch over a poor family getting $200 in food stamps monthly and can qualify for health care.

Originally Posted by Guest

That's right! Bush's war cost around 4,500 American lives, tens of thousands mentally and physically scarred for life but who cares since we Republicans can bitch over a poor family getting $200 in food stamps monthly and can qualify for health care.

Give it a break. We lost over 60,000 lives in Vietnam and who's war was that? What difference does it make who was in charge during the wars? Hillary voted for war in Iraq, Kerry voted for it and the majority voted for it. And it was the right thing to do, too. Your bleeding heart is disingenuous at best, to put it civilly.

It looks like Chillary is losing ground after the debate. The more America hears from her, the less they like her. Now, only 46% of Dems would vote for her if the election was today, according to the latest Rasmussen poll. It appears that she is going to have to resort to doing what liberals do, FISH in the dead pool. I guess there will be a lot of deceased voters again this election.