Obama aspired to be a transformative president and indeed to the nation’s detriment he has succeeded. The manner in which he made his accomplishments has been through executive orders, regulations and agency action.

Obama’s policies in changing immigration laws, blocking Keystone XL pipeline, the Iranian nuclear agreement, and the normalization of relations with Cuba were all done with executive action. Obama used troves of government regulations on policies he knew never would pass through Congress such as his climate change agenda, Labor Department’s rules on fiduciary standards, National Labor Relation Board’s that franchisees are joint employers, the EPA’s power grab over waterways, FCC’s attempt to regulate the Internet as a 1930 Telephone monopoly
Even legislation rooted in law was enacted with avoidance of program details and the granting of excessive and vast powers of related federal agencies, to wit: Afforded Care Act and Dodd-Frank

The good news is that at the beginning of the 2016 inaugural address the new president could sign an executive order rescinding all of Obama’s executive orders deemed harmful to economic growth or constitutionally suspect. The new president could then establish a blue ribbon commission to review all other Obama executive orders. Any order not reissued or amended in 60 days could be automatically rescinded. To accelerate this process the new president should name new cabinet and agency appointees before congress begins…… As congress debates repealing Dodd Frank , the new president’s appointees could ensure that no financial institution is too big to fail, that Federal Reserve bureaucrats are removed from corporate boardrooms………… The Affordable Care Act also grants substantial flexibility in its implementation, a feature Obama repeatedly exploited. The new president could suspend penalties for individuals and employers, enforce income verification requirements, ease the premium shock by adjusting community ratings, allow a different pricing structure inside the exchanges, and alter provider compensation which ultimately will yield to repeal and replacement.

Phil Gramm & Michael Solon Cheer Up, Obama’s Legacy Can Be Erased WSJ 12/21/15 Excerpts thereof

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Obama aspired to be a transformative president and indeed to the nation’s detriment he has succeeded. The manner in which he made his accomplishments has been through executive orders, regulations and agency action.

Obama’s policies in changing immigration laws, blocking Keystone XL pipeline, the Iranian nuclear agreement, and the normalization of relations with Cuba were all done with executive action. Obama used troves of government regulations on policies he knew never would pass through Congress such as his climate change agenda, Labor Department’s rules on fiduciary standards, National Labor Relation Board’s that franchisees are joint employers, the EPA’s power grab over waterways, FCC’s attempt to regulate the Internet as a 1930 Telephone monopoly
Even legislation rooted in law was enacted with avoidance of program details and the granting of excessive and vast powers of related federal agencies, to wit: Afforded Care Act and Dodd-Frank

The good news is that at the beginning of the 2016 inaugural address the new president could sign an executive order rescinding all of Obama’s executive orders deemed harmful to economic growth or constitutionally suspect. The new president could then establish a blue ribbon commission to review all other Obama executive orders. Any order not reissued or amended in 60 days could be automatically rescinded. To accelerate this process the new president should name new cabinet and agency appointees before congress begins…… As congress debates repealing Dodd Frank , the new president’s appointees could ensure that no financial institution is too big to fail, that Federal Reserve bureaucrats are removed from corporate boardrooms………… The Affordable Care Act also grants substantial flexibility in its implementation, a feature Obama repeatedly exploited. The new president could suspend penalties for individuals and employers, enforce income verification requirements, ease the premium shock by adjusting community ratings, allow a different pricing structure inside the exchanges, and alter provider compensation which ultimately will yield to repeal.

Personal Best Regards:

Now, why in the world would Mrs. Clinton do those things? She is going to be the next President and even YOU know that for a fact.

Originally Posted by Guest

Now, why in the world would Mrs. Clinton do those things? She is going to be the next President and even YOU know that for a fact.

Sybil the liberal seems to be a bit delusional when it comes to an election where no one has even been nominated. Wonder if the FBI will wait to arrest Hillary until after the primaries or before.

Do you really think the majority of America will vote for someone who is going to carry on in the footsteps of the current loser-in-chief?

Originally Posted by Guest

Do you really think the majority of America will vote for someone who is going to carry on in the footsteps of the current loser-in-chief?

Liberals think so. A bunch of them are still waiting for some of Obama's "stash."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLBexiCMkXo

So the 12 trillion on the charge card will be erased also? You forgot about cash for clunkers, the freebie electric LSV vechicle hand out, and all the law suits against states.

Oh man, I am disappointed. When I first read the title of the thread, I thought it said "Cheer up, Obama could be erased" and I got all excited. On a serious note, Obama will go down in history as a fly speck. No one will even know that because of him we have come so close to the edge of the precipice.

Originally Posted by Guest

Do you really think the majority of America will vote for someone who is going to carry on in the footsteps of the current loser-in-chief?

Hey Doofus,

You seem to be forgetting the majority of American voters TWICE voted Obama into office!

The loser-in-chief seems to be referring to McCain and to that Mormon ( a non-Christian).

Originally Posted by Guest

Hey Doofus,

You seem to be forgetting the majority of American voters TWICE voted Obama into office!

The loser-in-chief seems to be referring to McCain and to that Mormon ( a non-Christian).

First let me start with ....KMA!

Secondly we have to keep reminding the mis-informed that what is of significance is that the majority of American voters did not and still does not reflect the majority of Americans!!!!! Unfortunately.

Originally Posted by Guest

Secondly we have to keep reminding the mis-informed that what is of significance is that the majority of American voters did not and still does not reflect the majority of Americans!!!!! Unfortunately.

The majority of American voters does not reflect the majority of Americans?

If you refuse to or choose not to vote, you have absolutely no say in how conditions are in the country.

If you did vote and your candidate lost, tough it out and try to change things so next time your candidate does better - but still respect that a greater percentage of voters chose another path than you did.

If your political party does not seek out a diverse culture but stays stagnating, it does not appeal to the modern masses and therefore will not win.

The voters decide. The majority of voters win.

Originally Posted by Guest

The majority of American voters does not reflect the majority of Americans?

If you refuse to or choose not to vote, you have absolutely no say in how conditions are in the country.

If you did vote and your candidate lost, tough it out and try to change things so next time your candidate does better - but still respect that a greater percentage of voters chose another path than you did.

If your political party does not seek out a diverse culture but stays stagnating, it does not appeal to the modern masses and therefore will not win.

The voters decide. The majority of voters win.

No attempt to chanGE the vote results.......still does not change the fact the majority of Americans did not choose Obama.....like it or not tis a fact!

Everyone in support of Obama or Hillary Clinton causes one to think that given their absymal track records, their disdain and disrespect for America and its citizens and their lack of honesty and integrity leads one to conclude that such individuals have to be either delusional or cutters or both. You know the type those poor souls who continue to slash their bodies with a razor because they need to feel pain.

How else can you explain how anyone could not want to erase what Obama has done to harm this nation and to ensure that the next president will not continue down this road to America's destruction.

Frankly I am more concerned with the type of leadership of Obama and Clinton than I am of ISIS

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

No attempt to chanGE the vote results.......still does not change the fact the majority of Americans did not choose Obama.....like it or not tis a fact!

The majority of voting Americans chose Obama. Like it or not, tis a fact.

The majority of voting Americans will choose Mrs. Clinton, too. Like it or not, tis a fact.

Originally Posted by Guest

The majority of voting Americans chose Obama. Like it or not, tis a fact.

The majority of voting Americans will choose Mrs. Clinton, too. Like it or not, tis a fact.

Get an education. Fact is not synonymous with opinion. It is your OPINION that a majority of voters will choose Chillary, not FACT. Right now, the latest poll since the debates indicates that only 46% of the Dem voters would vote for her if the election was today. But, you go ahead and vote for her. I am sure that winning is more important than your country. Obviously, if you chose Obama, you were not concerned about your country, just yourself.

Originally Posted by Guest

The majority of voting Americans chose Obama. Like it or not, tis a fact.

The majority of voting Americans will choose Mrs. Clinton, too. Like it or not, tis a fact.

This time around there will be many more republicans making sure they get out to vote. And this time there will be many more democrats who just will not be fooled a third time and are sick and tired at what is happening to our beloved America and it's core values.

You can hope all you want. It will not take much to offset the 3% difference of the last election.

Must be terrible for party loyalists to not have a choice in the matter who to vote for......and even worse when the best offered is one who is not qualified, untrustworthy, law breaking, liar, self centered on herself. Must be very disappointing for those able to think on their own.