Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.

The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at
it's
finest, and we are financing it.

Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.

This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here's how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case one in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.
(In this case, over 1,000 did -- contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result -- foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?

This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling

Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they are Slick! Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017. Don't let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. You must inform and educate them.

You missed to mention that Hillary ordered Chelsea to get pregnant so it would play better with voters.

Vote Trump.

Originally Posted by Guest

Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.

The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at
it's
finest, and we are financing it.

Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.

This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here's how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case one in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.
(In this case, over 1,000 did -- contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result -- foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?

This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling

Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they are Slick! Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017. Don't let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. You must inform and educate them.

I think they got the idea from Mitt Romney how to hide money overseas, so why don't your cronies indict them?

Originally Posted by Guest

I think they got the idea from Mitt Romney how to hide money overseas, so why don't your cronies indict them?

I am amazed how you were able to read the original post with your head buried so deeply in the sand. Bait and switch all you want but I hear no factual denial regarding "The Foundation".

The Clintons are criminals and morally corrupt, but that is what the liberals like about them. They will rush out to vote for them, elect them, get screwed and happily bow and scrape to them as if they are royalty. Says bunches about the left. Easily led. Ever heard of "fools gold?" That's the Clintons.

Originally Posted by Guest

The Clintons are criminals and morally corrupt, but that is what the liberals like about them. They will rush out to vote for them, elect them, get screwed and happily bow and scrape to them as if they are royalty. Says bunches about the left. Easily led. Ever heard of "fools gold?" That's the Clintons.

And, the Clintons laugh all the way to the bank.

Originally Posted by Guest

I I think they got the idea from Mitt Romney how to hide money overseas, so why don't your cronies indict them?amazed how you were able to read the original post with your head buried so deeply in the sand. Bait and switch all you want but I hear no factual denial regarding "The Foundation".

I repeat "I think they got the idea from Mitt Romney how to hide money overseas, so why don't your cronies indict them?" Answer the quote or can't you think of anything but " head buried"

Originally Posted by Guest

And, the Clintons laugh all the way to the bank.

And their supporters wonder what happened.

Originally Posted by Guest

I repeat "I think they got the idea from Mitt Romney how to hide money overseas, so why don't your cronies indict them?" Answer the quote or can't you think of anything but " head buried"

Because Mitt Romney acted within the law, something that the Clintons show total contempt for. But, you already knew that, didn't you?

Originally Posted by Guest

I repeat "I think they got the idea from Mitt Romney how to hide money overseas, so why don't your cronies indict them?" Answer the quote or can't you think of anything but " head buried"

I don't know which post or poster you are questioning, but from what I could determine, the Romney's LEGALLY banked overseas and legally paid their taxes. From what I could see of the Clintons, not much has ever been done legally. Only their supporters seem to have their "head buried."

Originally Posted by Guest

Because Mitt Romney acted within the law, something that the Clintons show total contempt for. But, you already knew that, didn't you?

He didn't

Originally Posted by Guest

Because Mitt Romney acted within the law, something that the Clintons show total contempt for. But, you already knew that, didn't you?

Vote Trump. He seems honest.

Originally Posted by Guest

He didn't

Please cite the laws that he failed to comply with.

Originally Posted by Guest

Please cite the laws that he failed to comply with.

I was unclear. I was referring to the poster "already knowing that"