This thinking actually underscores the depths to which the democratic party is willing to go.

First an unqualified, unknown, know race aggrivator...Obama.

Now an unqualified, untrust worthy, liar....Clinton.

And the final insult to the American people. Chelsea!!! Using and abusing the name (if that is possible). Just in case we missed it maybe someone can enlighten us as to exactly what it is that would give her any consideration what so ever?

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...icle-1.2510390

I now go from respecting the oppositions's opinions and views (not accepting...just respect others rights) to being sympathetic to having such undesrved candidates for 2016 to complete pity.

Even though Chelsea's nose seems to be growing? She not known liar yet? I guess just cause she had extended stay in the White House she thinks she belongs there. I guess the one and only special reporting job she done for CNN was too much work and easier to just run your mouth and get paid more?

At least good looks is not a prerequisite to run for president.

Originally Posted by Guest

At least good looks is not a prerequisite to run for president.

An the sexist weighs in.....thanks for that!

An obvious statement of fact is sexist?

Originally Posted by Guest

An the sexist weighs in.....thanks for that!

Where is the reference to gender in that statement? Oh, perhaps you misspelled and meant Sexologist, right?

Originally Posted by Guest

An obvious statement of fact is sexist?

Facts??? Liberals don't need no stinkin' facts.

Originally Posted by Guest

At least good looks is not a prerequisite to run for president.

Quite possibly the dumbest, most ignorant posting in TOTV ever

Originally Posted by Guest

This thinking actually underscores the depths to which the democratic party is willing to go.

First an unqualified, unknown, know race aggrivator...Obama.

Now an unqualified, untrust worthy, liar....Clinton.

And the final insult to the American people. Chelsea!!! Using and abusing the name (if that is possible). Just in case we missed it maybe someone can enlighten us as to exactly what it is that would give her any consideration what so ever?

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...icle-1.2510390

I now go from respecting the oppositions's opinions and views (not accepting...just respect others rights) to being sympathetic to having such undesrved candidates for 2016 to complete pity.

This title of this thread is really quite deceiving. When you said "For your enjoyment and laughing pleasure" naturally, we thought you meant this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pinZNYxQeo

Originally Posted by Guest

This title of this thread is really quite deceiving. When you said "For your enjoyment and laughing pleasure" naturally, we thought you meant this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pinZNYxQeo

Dear Guest:

I will have to admit that I am not a big SNL fan. Historically there have been just a few from that show who are truly talented . I have never been enamored with people who attempt to imitate other people and especially because on SNL they seem to do so with a disdain for the character they are attempting to copy. Its one thing to have innocent fun its quite another to ridicule with hate which I believe is the intent on SNL. Its like making fun of a person with a disability and I never care for that either. Its like saying I am void of faults but just look at what is wrong with this person. So I do not get that enjoyment and laughing pleasure you reference.

Finally I am not deriving enjoyment from this election cycle. We don't need these circus distraction. We need serious adult conversation because this nation is at a critical turning point.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Dear Guest:

I will have to admit that I am not a big SNL fan. Historically there have been just a few from that show who are truly talented . I have never been enamored with people who attempt to imitate other people and especially because on SNL they seem to do so with a disdain for the character they are attempting to copy. Its one thing to have innocent fun its quite another to ridicule with hate which I believe is the intent on SNL. Its like making fun of a person with a disability and I never care for that either. Its like saying I am void of faults but just look at what is wrong with this person. So I do not get that enjoyment and laughing pleasure you reference.

Finally I am not deriving enjoyment from this election cycle. We don't need these circus distraction. We need serious adult conversation because this nation is at a critical turning point.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

This title of this thread is really quite deceiving. When you said "For your enjoyment and laughing pleasure" naturally, we thought you meant this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pinZNYxQeo

Funny and targeted sniping as usual by SNL.
But no.
We all know that even the most died in the wool democrats, and even the most left radicals would view the proposition of Chelsea Clinton to be anything other that what it is.....

a big joke!!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Funny and targeted sniping as usual by SNL.
But no.
We all know that even the most died in the wool democrats, and even the most left radicals would view the proposition of Chelsea Clinton to be anything other that what it is.....

a big joke!!!!

The Clintons seem to be forcing their retarded daughter into politics and it is obvious that she is not equipped for the job. So, shouldn't they be charged with child abuse and exploitation?

Anyone that has listened to her speak, knows that she has the mentality of a adolescent child at best. Just my opinion.

Since Palin's children are fair game even though they are not involved in politics, surely no one will defend the verbal disparagement of Chelsea, who IS involved in her mother's political campaign.

I am hoping for an honest reaction from some of the liberal posters.

We acknowledge some are automatically beholding to the Clintons as long as there is one standing.....no matter qualified, dishonest, untrustworthy or incapable of finding their backside with a map.

Originally Posted by Guest

This thinking actually underscores the depths to which the democratic party is willing to go.

First an unqualified, unknown, know race aggrivator...Obama.

Now an unqualified, untrust worthy, liar....Clinton.

And the final insult to the American people. Chelsea!!! Using and abusing the name (if that is possible). Just in case we missed it maybe someone can enlighten us as to exactly what it is that would give her any consideration what so ever?

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...icle-1.2510390

I now go from respecting the oppositions's opinions and views (not accepting...just respect others rights) to being sympathetic to having such undesrved candidates for 2016 to complete pity.

this from the party of Palin and Trump.