Electability Electability - Talk of The Villages Florida

Electability

 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-10-2016, 08:56 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Electability

There have been the first two contests of this year's Presidential race.

The question we have to be thinking about is "who is electible"?

Is Bernie Sanders really electible? Nope. He is like Gene McCarthy and that will not fly.

Donald Trump? No, he is just making noises and could not function as President.

Cruz? No, he cannot get along with his own party.

Rubio? Maybe.

Hillary? Most likely the next President.
  #2  
Old 02-10-2016, 09:16 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
There have been the first two contests of this year's Presidential race.

The question we have to be thinking about is "who is electible"?

Is Bernie Sanders really electible? Nope. He is like Gene McCarthy and that will not fly.

Donald Trump? No, he is just making noises and could not function as President.

Cruz? No, he cannot get along with his own party.

Rubio? Maybe.

Hillary? Most likely the next President.



..... this
  #3  
Old 02-10-2016, 11:56 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
There have been the first two contests of this year's Presidential race.

The question we have to be thinking about is "who is electible"?

Is Bernie Sanders really electible? Nope. He is like Gene McCarthy and that will not fly.

Donald Trump? No, he is just making noises and could not function as President.

Cruz? No, he cannot get along with his own party.

Rubio? Maybe.

Hillary? Most likely the next President.
  #4  
Old 02-11-2016, 03:28 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guest View Post
there have been the first two contests of this year's presidential race.

The question we have to be thinking about is "who is electible"?

Is bernie sanders really electible? Nope. He is like gene mccarthy and that will not fly.

Donald trump? No, he is just making noises and could not function as president.

Cruz? No, he cannot get along with his own party.

Rubio? Maybe.

Hillary? Most likely the next president.
troll !!!
  #5  
Old 02-11-2016, 07:38 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Think about it. I strongly support a candidate. I am ashamed of my party. I am doubly make that triply against the other parties candidate. Biden or Bloomy are not the answer either. We have trouble on the horizon. God Blessed us But God help us.
  #6  
Old 02-11-2016, 07:48 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Think about it. I strongly support a candidate. I am ashamed of my party. I am doubly make that triply against the other parties candidate. Biden or Bloomy are not the answer either. We have trouble on the horizon. God Blessed us But God help us.
A moment of silence for the democrats.........57, 58, 59, 60......

OK all done!
  #7  
Old 02-11-2016, 09:19 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest;118***2
troll !!!
Wow, awake at 3:25 a.m. and ranting on at least two threads on Political Forum.

Dude, get some sleeping pills if you cannot sleep.
  #8  
Old 02-11-2016, 09:46 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hillary Clinton seems the most pragmatic choice so far. Maybe, one of the Republicans will get his act together.
  #9  
Old 02-11-2016, 09:53 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Hillary Clinton seems the most pragmatic choice so far. Maybe, one of the Republicans will get his act together.
Hillary Clinton is obviously scum. Why in the world would you even consider her? Do you have no clue? Do you not read or watch the news? Pragmatic??? What a dumb @ss comment!
  #10  
Old 02-11-2016, 10:16 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was planning on voting for John Kasich but today he is signing a bill which defunds Planned Parenthood.

My vote, as a Reagan democrat, must go somewhere else.
  #11  
Old 02-11-2016, 10:31 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I was planning on voting for John Kasich but today he is signing a bill which defunds Planned Parenthood.

My vote, as a Reagan democrat, must go somewhere else.
Kasich earned my respect. They don't need PP. Besides, PP gets donations from plenty of libtards. It shouldn't be getting our tax dollars, as payment to kill future liberal voters. There are plenty of other establishments that provide female health services.

Reagan democrat...ha,ha. Good one!
  #12  
Old 02-11-2016, 10:44 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[QUOTE=Guest;1184420]Kasich earned my respect. They don't need PP. Besides, PP gets donations from plenty of libtards. It shouldn't be getting our tax dollars, as payment to kill future liberal voters. There are plenty of other establishments that provide female health services.
QUOTE]

You know nothing of what Planned Parenthood offers, do you?

You just rely on the Faux News and the Tea Bag idiots posting on this forum.
  #13  
Old 02-11-2016, 10:46 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I was planning on voting for John Kasich but today he is signing a bill which defunds Planned Parenthood.

My vote, as a Reagan democrat, must go somewhere else.
Because he is against funding the baby slaughter house?

So you are obviously in support of the millions of abortions, excluding rape and incest. And in addition you are OK withe the butchering of the murdered fetus/babies for parts. And the throwing the rest of a new born child in the garbage.

No personal investment so it is easy to do away with a life with no more remorse than flipping a light switch. Shades of Auschwitz!!!
  #14  
Old 02-11-2016, 12:12 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[QUOTE=Guest;1184426]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Kasich earned my respect. They don't need PP. Besides, PP gets donations from plenty of libtards. It shouldn't be getting our tax dollars, as payment to kill future liberal voters. There are plenty of other establishments that provide female health services.
QUOTE]

You know nothing of what Planned Parenthood offers, do you?

You just rely on the Faux News and the Tea Bag idiots posting on this forum.
There you go again. Can't debate so you use personal attacks. It's obvious by your comment that you know nothing about PP and nothing about Reagan. But, that is the great thing about Google. If you are not too lazy, you can do some research. After all, you want to be ready to take advantage of all that free college and stuff that comes from voting for Democrats.

By the way, there are other health services available to women that are NOT named Planned Parenthood, that are as good or better. And they don't beg for gov subsidy. FOX news thanks you for making them the most viewed cable news network. Without the liberal viewer, they would never have succeeded to become number one. I've never been to a Tea Party meeting, but if you want to learn more about them instead of what you hear from Nancy Pelosi on your liberal media outlet, I would be glad to attend one with you. Your education is very important to me.......
  #15  
Old 02-11-2016, 12:44 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Kasich earned my respect. They don't need PP. Besides, PP gets donations from plenty of libtards. It shouldn't be getting our tax dollars, as payment to kill future liberal voters. There are plenty of other establishments that provide female health services.

Reagan democrat...ha,ha. Good one!
You are so totally unbelievable. I am a Democrat that voted for Reagan which makes me a Reagan democrat...

Planned Parenthood DOES NOT RECEIVE TAX DOLLARS FOR ABORTIONS DUE TO THE HYDE AMENDMENT...

In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortion unless the pregnancy arises from incest, rape, or to save the life of the mother.

But you are not intellectually inquisitive enough to research the facts...you just bang the drum of Fox News.

Humor us who exactly are the institutions who will provide pap smears and other women's health services when PP is defunded? A non-response will mean you are yet again blowing smoke!
 

Tags
function, electability


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 PM.