his clip/report is the best depiction of a lawyer/liar called on the weasel wording answer:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ing-the-truth/

She is so phony she cannot hide it.

"I think I understand why she answered the way she did. She knows she has been in public life for a long time and that she has said lots and lots of things. Because of that, it's possible that at some point in the future, someone will unearth a statement in which it could be construed that she wasn't telling the whole truth. Clinton is protecting against the damage incurred by such a revelation."

I get it. She's long in the tooth and said a lot of things over many years. Who's the honest candidate we should be looking at?

Originally Posted by Guest

"I think I understand why she answered the way she did. She knows she has been in public life for a long time and that she has said lots and lots of things. Because of that, it's possible that at some point in the future, someone will unearth a statement in which it could be construed that she wasn't telling the whole truth. Clinton is protecting against the damage incurred by such a revelation."

I get it. She's long in the tooth and said a lot of things over many years. Who's the honest candidate we should be looking at?

between Clinton and Bernie? Bernie of course.
Only to be beaten by Biden at the last minute.
Who will be beaten in the election.

A lawyer trained, crooked, felonious politician will never ever answer a question with a yes or no. Most often will not ever answer the question.
Always preserve deniability.

Shallow and paper thin, wannabes.

Originally Posted by Guest

"I think I understand why she answered the way she did. She knows she has been in public life for a long time and that she has said lots and lots of things. Because of that, it's possible that at some point in the future, someone will unearth a statement in which it could be construed that she wasn't telling the whole truth. Clinton is protecting against the damage incurred by such a revelation."

I get it. She's long in the tooth and said a lot of things over many years. Who's the honest candidate we should be looking at?

I'll ask again. Who is the honest candidate including everyone who is running? You answered like a cagey lawyer.

Maybe I misunderstood. By default you think all the republicans candidates are dishonest.

Originally Posted by Guest

I'll ask again. Who is the honest candidate including everyone who is running? You answered like a cagey lawyer.

Maybe I misunderstood. By default you think all the republicans candidates are dishonest.

Ah, the old distort the reply trick. Sorry, but you are transparent in your obvious baiting. There are no "honest" candidates running for office, because to be technically correct, one would have to assume that "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of GOD." Therefore, you will have to rate the candidate on how he/she is more honest or dishonest than the other. In this case, it is obvious by anyone that is even partially current with the news that Hillary is the evil incarnate spawn of Satan.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...OSW_story.html

A look back to 2012.

I had a very hard time voting in 2012.

Originally Posted by Guest

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...OSW_story.html

A look back to 2012.

I had a very hard time voting in 2012.

Hey, if the dead can vote twice, then surely it should not be too difficult for you.