If the primaries get to be to messy and violence continues and gets out of hand could the general election be suspended?

No, it is constitutionally mandated. Only exception would be a declaration of martial law suspending the Constitution. In the event of terroristic threats at polling sites it may be within the law to extend voting time, place, or methodology. Would certainly be challenged in court.

Isn't Congress mandated by The Constitution to pass and approve a Budget annually. They did last Tuesday for the first time in 6 years. So with Congess' respect for our Constitution in mind couldn't we just skip the election this cycle and not have a President ~ just wing it!

Isn't Congress mandated by The Constitution to pass and approve a Budget annually. They did last Tuesday for the first time in 6 years.

I have no idea what you could be referencing. I follow news closely and there does not seem to have been any Budget passed on March 8th. Link please.

The deteriorating rate of this forum is accelerating!

Originally Posted by Guest

The deteriorating rate of this forum is accelerating!

I see it as 3 distinct types of writers.
You have the Hatfield and McCoys writers. They hate by brands and labels.
You have the writers that provide sources and try to bash the Hatfield and McCoys.
You have the writers that laugh or ignore the Hatfields and McCoys and try to make a case with either personal knowledge, expertise or with links and references. You can learn from those people or at least have a better understanding why they think as they do.

If deteriorating means the Hatfields and McCoys are not have as much fun, I would agree.

Originally Posted by Guest

I see it as 3 distinct types of writers.
You have the Hatfield and McCoys writers. They hate by brands and labels.
You have the writers that provide sources and try to bash the Hatfield and McCoys.
You have the writers that laugh or ignore the Hatfields and McCoys and try to make a case with either personal knowledge, expertise or with links and references. You can learn from those people or at least have a better understanding why they think as they do.

If deteriorating means the Hatfields and McCoys are not have as much fun, I would agree.

Perhaps.
The original post can best be described as bait.
Primaries getting messy? What does that mean to the avrage thinking person?
Violence in the primaries? Does the original poster mean like the violence that special interest groups display at police shootings? Or the one time some organized disruptors caused in last nights news?

So very non-sensical, so sense, deterioration of content.

More and more of such becoming less deserving of any response.

Occupy Wall St, Black lives matter, move on.org can fight at Trumps rallies and liberals attempt to blame Trump for advocating violence. Go figure. These are planned violent actions, not spontaneous. Liberals are such lemmings! Bernie's going to give them free college,,,ha,ha. Yep, as long as they are prepared to pay for it the rest of their lives in increased taxes. He said it, not me. Hillary says it is a GOP conspiracy that she mishandled classified information. She says it is a video that caused Amb Stevens to get killed, even though she sent classified itinerary of his movements on an unsecured Internet system. But, liberals don't believe that, even though the proof is all over the Internet. It must be the poor quality water that is causing all that liberal mental debilitation.

Originally Posted by Guest

Liberals are such lemmings! Bernie's going to give them free college,,,ha,ha.

And what good does a degree do someone who nobody is going to hire? If you're "from the hood", degree or not, nobody wants you in their building. There can be only so many chiefs. Many are not capable of being a chief. Don't give them false hopes. That's why they're ****ed. You told them they could be successful when the reality is, they can't.

Originally Posted by Guest

And what good does a degree do someone who nobody is going to hire? If you're "from the hood", degree or not, nobody wants you in their building. There can be only so many chiefs. Many are not capable of being a chief. Don't give them false hopes. That's why they're ****ed. You told them they could be successful when the reality is, they can't.

I had a friend at work who was about 15 years older then me. She said that if she was in charge of everything she would make all children take a year off after the 8th grade to work and then start high school. We wouldn't need to pay them much, hardly anything the real learning will take place getting to work everyday and mentoring professionals. It would be easy for me. My dad was and electrician and I was already helping him a little. In my town that would be about 120 kids working somewhere in town.
The older I get the more I think that was a brilliant idea. I realize the liability is tremendous. I guess you could minimize the risks if the parents are the ones that find the jobs.
Just think how life changing that could be.

Originally Posted by Guest

I had a friend at work who was about 15 years older then me. She said that if she was in charge of everything she would make all children take a year off after the 8th grade to work and then start high school. We wouldn't need to pay them much, hardly anything the real learning will take place getting to work everyday and mentoring professionals. It would be easy for me. My dad was and electrician and I was already helping him a little. In my town that would be about 120 kids working somewhere in town.
The older I get the more I think that was a brilliant idea. I realize the liability is tremendous. I guess you could minimize the risks if the parents are the ones that find the jobs.
Just think how life changing that could be.

That's fine and dandy in white suburbia...in fact MOST ideas work well in white suburbia. What do you do with the inner cities? Most don't know what a job is. Are they going to sell drugs? They probably already do. Give them a year off and you'll never see them again.

Unfortunately everyone isn't really equal.

Originally Posted by Guest

Most don't know what a job is.

Why?

Originally Posted by Guest

Why?

Because they don't need a job, everything is provided for them. Housing, food, a phone... Only in America are the poor the fattest.

Originally Posted by Guest

Because they don't need a job, everything is provided for them. Housing, food, a phone... Only in America are the poor the fattest.

Really? And if we don't provide food, housing a phone they will be qualified for a good job. Is that the plan? That will break the cycle. I don't think it will.

Her idea is to break the cycle by putting kids to work for one year after the eighth grade. I compared it to student teaching. I remember a lot of student teachers who only found out when they did their student teaching in their senior year that it was not a good career fit.

My observation is that the kids that did their homework were the most likely to succeed. How do you light fire? This is my friends idea to light the fire.

What is your idea?

No work, no food. Simple as that.