It is also interesting to read another source that describes Clinton's approach to hiding evidence during Whitewater.

Hillary Clinton E-Mail Investigation: Jim Comey's FBI Record

It gags me to say it but she and Bill and slid off the hook of legality so many times in the past I fear there is a pattern established and somehow she will either use, abuse or hide behind the law and be given a pass.

I still for the life of me cannot see how anybody that is objective about information that is available about Clinton's past, her numerous bouts and brushes with the law as well as controversy after controversyin and around suspect behavior....most involving a cover up of some kind or another.......how can a person of such suspicious character gain the support of so many people.

I suppose it demonstrates the sad fact that the person is not the priority, the party is. I have said it before, if Charles Manson was the democrtic andidate his supporters would find a way to explain away his past!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

It is also interesting to read another source that describes Clinton's approach to hiding evidence during Whitewater.

Hillary Clinton E-Mail Investigation: Jim Comey's FBI Record

It gags me to say it but she and Bill and slid off the hook of legality so many times in the past I fear there is a pattern established and somehow she will either use, abuse or hide behind the law and be given a pass.

I still for the life of me cannot see how anybody that is objective about information that is available about Clinton's past, her numerous bouts and brushes with the law as well as controversy after controversyin and around suspect behavior....most involving a cover up of some kind or another.......how can a person of such suspicious character gain the support of so many people.

I suppose it demonstrates the sad fact that the person is not the priority, the party is. I have said it before, if Charles Manson was the democrtic andidate his supporters would find a way to explain away his past!!!

I read your link. Thank-you for being up front and providing something to read.

"Comey had a front-row seat to Clinton’s controversial handling of documents in the White-water case. Ultimately the Senate committee he worked for two decades ago found no criminal wrongdoing but issued a politically damaging report anyway.

What will come of the Comey primary? Says Giacalone: “If the evidence is there, it’s there. If it leads to something inconclusive, or nothing, he’s not going to recommend filing charges.”

I think if she is guilty of every charge that has been brought up in the last 40 years then either everything is corrupt or the opposite is true.

Originally Posted by Guest

I read your link. Thank-you for being up front and providing something to read.

"Comey had a front-row seat to Clinton’s controversial handling of documents in the White-water case. Ultimately the Senate committee he worked for two decades ago found no criminal wrongdoing but issued a politically damaging report anyway.

What will come of the Comey primary? Says Giacalone: “If the evidence is there, it’s there. If it leads to something inconclusive, or nothing, he’s not going to recommend filing charges.”

I think if she is guilty of every charge that has been brought up in the last 40 years then either everything is corrupt or the opposite is true.

Being guilty and being proven guilty are two different things, ask O.J. Simpson.

Originally Posted by Guest

Being guilty and being proven guilty are two different things, ask O.J. Simpson.

You got another case? There must be dozens.

Originally Posted by Guest

You got another case? There must be dozens.

If you KNOW that there MUST be dozens, why are you trying to waste my time? I have better things to do than research legal cases for you.

Originally Posted by Guest

If you KNOW that there MUST be dozens, why are you trying to waste my time? I have better things to do than research legal cases for you.

You got nothing. Everyone knows OJ was guilty. Chris Rock knows he was guilty. OJ did what white people do who have money. He hired the best, Johnny Cochran. His team was smart enough to give the jury a shadow of doubt. That's what people were celebrating. Not that he was innocent but just that a black man bought himself out of trouble.

Originally Posted by Guest

You got nothing. Everyone knows OJ was guilty. Chris Rock knows he was guilty. OJ did what white people do who have money. He hired the best, Johnny Cochran. His team was smart enough to give the jury a shadow of doubt. That's what people were celebrating. Not that he was innocent but just that a black man bought himself out of trouble.

It's "reasonable doubt", NOT "shadow of doubt", genius. You know nothing!

Originally Posted by Guest

It's "reasonable doubt", NOT "shadow of doubt", genius. You know nothing!

You got me there F Lee Bailey. You got anything else?

Originally Posted by Guest

You got me there F Lee Bailey. You got anything else?

If you KNOW that there MUST be dozens, why are you trying to waste my time? I have better things to do than research legal cases for you.


Obviously you know a lot about the law. Why with someone with your background need Google?

Originally Posted by Guest

If you KNOW that there MUST be dozens, why are you trying to waste my time? I have better things to do than research legal cases for you.


Obviously you know a lot about the law. Why with someone with your background need Google?

Google? Seriously? I don't know where you practiced law, but the lawyers I know don't used Google to do case research and case briefs.

Never ceases to amaze when a controversial, pertinent, issue of significance is always immediately reduced to a personal pi$$ing contest.

My suspicion? Inability to carry on a cogent discussion due to lack of knowledge or _ ? _ .

At least we got a couple of counterpoints of interest on the subject, before the usual food fight.

Originally Posted by Guest

You got nothing. Everyone knows OJ was guilty. Chris Rock knows he was guilty. OJ did what white people do who have money. He hired the best, Johnny Cochran. His team was smart enough to give the jury a shadow of doubt. That's what people were celebrating. Not that he was innocent but just that a black man bought himself out of trouble.

BS! They celebrated cause he got away with murder.

The state of Cala. Lost it due to stupid state employees. Judge and prosecutors.

Clinton will not be indicted due to lack of evidence, democrats have the FBI and attorney general in there pocket. All will be sweep under the rug before November. Actually all department director's are democrats in 90% of ALL federal agencies. Including all branches of the service. Majority got indoctrated in the liberal colleges. This is how the system works.

Originally Posted by Guest

Clinton will not be indicted due to lack of evidence, democrats have the FBI and attorney general in there pocket. All will be sweep under the rug before November. Actually all department director's are democrats in 90% of ALL federal agencies. Including all branches of the service. Majority got indoctrated in the liberal colleges. This is how the system works.

You have it pretty close to totally right. She is obviously guilty, but they will find some way to cover for her. After all, she threatened to take Obama down with her if she is indicted.

Originally Posted by Guest

Clinton will not be indicted due to lack of evidence, democrats have the FBI and attorney general in there pocket. All will be sweep under the rug before November. Actually all department director's are democrats in 90% of ALL federal agencies. Including all branches of the service. Majority got indoctrated in the liberal colleges. This is how the system works.

Establishment, cronyism politics at it's best!