Republicans are such hypocrites.

The George W. Bush email scandal the media has conveniently forgotten - Salon.com

Thanks for pointing that out.

Originally Posted by Guest

Republicans are such hypocrites.

The George W. Bush email scandal the media has conveniently forgotten - Salon.com

Few people cared in March of 2015 when the article was initially published and even fewer (is that's possible) care now.

Originally Posted by Guest

Few people cared in March of 2015 when the article was initially published and even fewer (is that's possible) care now.

And how do you know that?

Originally Posted by Guest

Republicans are such hypocrites.

The George W. Bush email scandal the media has conveniently forgotten - Salon.com

Those e-mails didn't contain top secret special access information. A crime for which you or I would go to prison. But Hillary, and elite and therefore above the law, gets a pass.

Originally Posted by Guest

And how do you know that?

I read the title of the article.

Originally Posted by Guest

Those e-mails didn't contain top secret special access information. A crime for which you or I would go to prison. But Hillary, and elite and therefore above the law, gets a pass.

The emails had been run through private accounts controlled by the Republican National Committee and were only supposed to be used for dealing with non-administration political campaign work to avoid violating ethics laws. Yet congressional investigators already had evidence private emails had been used for government business, including to discuss the firing of one of the U.S. attorneys. The RNC accounts were used by 22 White House staffers, including then-Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, who reportedly used his RNC email for 95 percent of his communications.

If they are missing how would you know whether or not emails were classified? Couldn't it be that the general public were less computer savvy in 2007? Maybe it didn't get the attention because the subject of security and the implications were more obscure at the time. What's your expert, inside information, gut instinct tell you.

Originally Posted by Guest

The emails had been run through private accounts controlled by the Republican National Committee and were only supposed to be used for dealing with non-administration political campaign work to avoid violating ethics laws. Yet congressional investigators already had evidence private emails had been used for government business, including to discuss the firing of one of the U.S. attorneys. The RNC accounts were used by 22 White House staffers, including then-Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, who reportedly used his RNC email for 95 percent of his communications.

If they are missing how would you know whether or not emails were classified? Couldn't it be that the general public were less computer savvy in 2007? Maybe it didn't get the attention because the subject of security and the implications were more obscure at the time. What's your expert, inside information, gut instinct tell you.

In the first place, top secret SA is reserved for only the most sensitive information, disclosure of which will put the country in grave danger. Correspondence about firing DA's, as damning as it is, would hardly rise to that level of classification.

In the second place, that kind of information is stored on servers that are not connected to the internet. Only those with a need to know can access it under very stringent conditions. Unless, of course, your name is Hillary Clinton. In that case you can do whatever the hell you want, and get away with it, country be damned.

I'm waiting for Putin to release her e-mails so we can see what was in them.

Originally Posted by Guest

In the first place, top secret SA is reserved for only the most sensitive information, disclosure of which will put the country in grave danger. Correspondence about firing DA's, as damning as it is, would hardly rise to that level of classification.

In the second place, that kind of information is stored on servers that are not connected to the internet. Only those with a need to know can access it under very stringent conditions. Unless, of course, your name is Hillary Clinton. In that case you can do whatever the hell you want, and get away with it, country be damned.

I'm waiting for Putin to release her e-mails so we can see what was in them.

WikiLeaks did that.
WikiLeaks Published Over 1,000 of Hillary Clinton's War Emails - Fortune

Originally Posted by Guest

Those e-mails didn't contain top secret special access information. A crime for which you or I would go to prison. But Hillary, and elite and therefore above the law, gets a pass.

....

Originally Posted by Guest

Thanks for pointing that out.

Liberals are such guppies!

Of course, business is conducted on the Internet. But, CLASSIFIED information is NOT. Classified is not transmitted on an open Internet system. It is on it's own system and only those that have an INTENT to move it to an unsecured system can move it illegally. Any media (ie, thumb-drive, floppy, cd, etc) that is used on a classified system, has to be marked with the highest classification of material on it and cannot/CANNOT be inserted into an unclassified system. A violation of this is intentional and a felony. If Hillary is pleading ignorance, then she is certainly NOT a person you want running our country. Anyone that claims ignorance after all the training required and briefing required before being allowed a security clearance, is just a blatant LIAR. Any liberal that is stupid enough to vote for someone so obviously corrupt and evil, has to be either mentally retarded or just plain anti-American. There is no other explanation.