Judicial Watch, which released the documents Monday, said in a statement that the messages show Clinton aide Huma Abedin “provided influential Clinton Foundation donors special, expedited access to the secretary of state.” The documents include exchanges not previously turned over to the State Department.

The exchange involving the crown prince of Bahrain occurred in June 2009. It started with top foundation official Doug Band notifying Abedin that the crown prince was coming to the U.S. and seeking a meeting. He noted he is a “good friend of ours.”

Abedin wrote back that the crown prince had asked to see Clinton through “normal channels.”

She added: “I asked and she said she doesn’t want to commit to anything for thurs or fri until she knows how she will feel. Also she says that she may want to go to ny and doesn’t want to be committed to stuff in ny.”

Two days later, Abedin wrote to Band saying they were offering up a morning meeting between Clinton and the crown prince.

As noted by Judicial Watch, the foundation website says the crown prince committed to an international scholarship program in 2005, through the Clinton Global Initiative. According to the site, this commitment was worth $32 million, in addition to other reported donations from the Kingdom of Bahrain.

The Clinton campaign, though, pushed back on the Judicial Watch claims, pointing to the original Abedin email that said the crown prince went through “normal channels.”

In its statement on Monday, Judicial Watch highlighted several other exchanges that it claimed showed Abedin helping provide access to donors who had given anywhere from $25,000 to $10 million to the foundation.

The release Monday follows another email release earlier this month by Judicial Watch. One of those exchanges showed Band trying to put a wealthy foundation donor in touch with the U.S. ambassador to Lebanon.

Such emails have fueled accusations from Republicans of a “pay-to-play” operation. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump – Hillary Clinton’s rival in the 2016 race – on Monday called for the foundation to be shut down,

“It is now clear that the Clinton Foundation is the most corrupt enterprise in political history. What they were doing during Crooked Hillary’s time as Secretary of State was wrong then, and it is wrong now. It must be shut down immediately,” he said in a statement.

The Clinton campaign touted the foundation's contingency plans in hitting back at Trump’s call Monday.

More emails, meanwhile, are in the pipeline for release. A federal judge in a Judicial Watch case earlier Monday ordered the State Department to expedite its review of some 14,900 emails uncovered by the FBI over the course of its investigation into Clinton's private email practices.

Those emails are part of the larger cache of documents not previously disclosed by Clinton, and are in addition to the roughly 55,000 emails turned over to federal investigators.

State Department Mark Toner has been very clear today while being attacked by the Right Wing Media :

" NOTHING TO SEE HERE . NO NEED FOR ANY DISCUSSION " .

The Clintons are scumbag leaches, and yet the left only had two choices. Either a perverted old socialist or a scumbag, pathological liar and thief. So, they decided to nominate the crooked scumbag. How any AMerican could possibly vote for such a scumbag criminal just shows you how immoral our country has become.

Originally Posted by Guest

The Clintons are scumbag leaches, and yet the left only had two choices. Either a perverted old socialist or a scumbag, pathological liar and thief. So, they decided to nominate the crooked scumbag. How any AMerican could possibly vote for such a scumbag criminal just shows you how immoral our country has become.

it is all done in the backrooms and that has always been so.
Why can Soros and Buffet run the democratic party-HINT MONEY.
The republicans are not innocent either for them it is the Hunts.
We have political packs anonymously running ads and others planting stories. We have BOUGHT PEOPLE letting politicians get away with crimes you would go to jail for.
THE FAULT? THE AMERICAN VOTER IS THE FAULT. WE HAVE ACCESS TO FAR MORE INFORMATION FOR AND AGAINST THE CHOICE IT IS YOUR DUTY TO MAKE AND YET WE RELISH INFORMATION DAMNING THE OTHER SIDE AND GIVE OUR PRE-MADE CHOICE A PASS.
PERHAPS, WE GET WHAT WE DESERVE.

How does this differ from the many, many lobbyists on Capital Hill that pay a lot of money for votes and access to High Ranking Officials on a daily basis? One big one NRA!!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

THE FAULT? THE AMERICAN VOTER IS THE FAULT. WE HAVE ACCESS TO FAR MORE INFORMATION FOR AND AGAINST THE CHOICE IT IS YOUR DUTY TO MAKE AND YET WE RELISH INFORMATION DAMNING THE OTHER SIDE AND GIVE OUR PRE-MADE CHOICE A PASS.
PERHAPS, WE GET WHAT WE DESERVE.

Using all capital letters in electronic communication is not unlike shouting at someone in person. It is a common technique used by HUSTLERS to get attention AND THOSE WITH VISION PROBLEMS.

It does not matter what form of internet communication you are using, shouting is not acceptable. There are caveats and exceptions. Subject lines, headings, and advertisements are often in all capital letters for readability reasons.

No one likes to be yelled at, but every once in a while you have to shout at someone to get their attention. Therefore, using all caps is bad netiquette because it's shouting, but is acceptable for certain reasons.

Does anyone have information that would indicate anything criminal ?

Thus far, in reading all I can see is a definitive appearance problem.

Open to hear the criminal aspect

Originally Posted by Guest

Does anyone have information that would indicate anything criminal ?

Thus far, in reading all I can see is a definitive appearance problem.

Open to hear the criminal aspect

I'll keep looking.

Certainly the indication is there and the wilful destruction of more potential evidence is yet another indicator. The inevitable is around the corner, hopefully before election day.

When President Clinton left the White House in 2001, he knew he wanted to spend his life as a private citizen working in the areas he cared about most and where he could make a measurable difference. His vision: a nongovernmental organization that could leverage the unique capacities of governments, partner organizations, and other individuals to address rising inequalities and deliver tangible results that improve people’s lives.

he did he scammed a hundred million in his pocket

Originally Posted by Guest

he did he scammed a hundred million in his pocket

total BS

Originally Posted by Guest

When President Clinton left the White House in 2001, he knew he wanted to spend his life as a private citizen working in the areas he cared about most and where he could make a measurable difference. His vision: a nongovernmental organization that could leverage the unique capacities of governments, partner organizations, and other individuals to address rising inequalities and deliver tangible results that improve people’s lives.

Clinton is a common criminal. His wife is also. His/their only goal was power and wealth. They are scumbags that have blind and ignorant followers. Blind because anyone can see their criminal corruption and ignorant because they believe the corruption is perfectly acceptable.

Originally Posted by Guest

Clinton is a common criminal. His wife is also. His/their only goal was power and wealth. They are scumbags that have blind and ignorant followers. Blind because anyone can see their criminal corruption and ignorant because they believe the corruption is perfectly acceptable.

I suppose you were interrupted while typing your litany right before you contributed any kind of criminal activities that you could even supply a hint of.

Originally Posted by Guest

Clinton is a common criminal. His wife is also. His/their only goal was power and wealth. They are scumbags that have blind and ignorant followers. Blind because anyone can see their criminal corruption and ignorant because they believe the corruption is perfectly acceptable.

It is very popular to talk like this, you know, simply go after with no facts at all, and make it personal.

Never supply facts or proof..just talk nasty about them..never mind facts.

Clintons certainly help this with their actions but this sounds like the candidate who just demeans people with no facts...what was his name again...