The Cancer Industry is Too Prosperous to Allow a Cure

Pretty "sickening"

Money, it's all they care about.

The food industry "causes" it, and then the medical industry "treats" it.

Originally Posted by Guest

The Cancer Industry is Too Prosperous to Allow a Cure

Pretty "sickening"

Money, it's all they care about.

The food industry "causes" it, and then the medical industry "treats" it.

Maybe people should have some self-control and quit blaming others for their own weakness. People need to quit blaming others for what they consume. If they know that sugar is bad for them, then it is their own fault if they get fat from eating it in excess. If you know which foods cause cancer, then don't eat them. Why do people drink or smoke? It is their choice, not genetic or from anyone threatening them. Americans need to quit blaming others for their problems and accept some of the blame.

Originally Posted by Guest

The Cancer Industry is Too Prosperous to Allow a Cure

Pretty "sickening"

Money, it's all they care about.

The food industry "causes" it, and then the medical industry "treats" it.

Think again. If unsuccessfully "treating" cancer is "profitable", how much do you think they could sell "the cure" for??????

Originally Posted by Guest

Think again. If unsuccessfully "treating" cancer is "profitable", how much do you think they could sell "the cure" for??????

If you want profits...why would you SELL someone something you can RENT to them and collect payments forever. You can get a LOT more over several years than you can in a lump sum.

Take pharmaceuticals, they don't cure you, they take away the symptoms...and every month you buy more.

If they cure you, you stop coming and they lose income.

Originally Posted by Guest

If you want profits...why would you SELL someone something you can RENT to them and collect payments forever. You can get a LOT more over several years than you can in a lump sum.

Take pharmaceuticals, they don't cure you, they take away the symptoms...and every month you buy more.

If they cure you, you stop coming and they lose income.

Like I said, THINK again

Originally Posted by Guest

Like I said, THINK again

There's a disconnect here. I'm obviously not seeing your point because...

Renting someone something when YOU set the rent is ALWAYS more profitable than selling something to someone outright.

When you start curing, you start running out of customers...quick. When you DON'T cure, and you treat the symptoms, you have a customer for "life".

If I sell you a house I get a profit. If I rent you the house, I get MORE profit and when you "leave", someone else moves in right away. I start collecting rent again.

I just don't see how an upfront profit beats a long term profit. Cancer occurrences are increasing, meaning more "rent"...curing them would make them go down and after a few years, you'd have NO business left.

I am thinking...

Originally Posted by Guest

There's a disconnect here. I'm obviously not seeing your point because...

Renting someone something when YOU set the rent is ALWAYS more profitable than selling something to someone outright.

When you start curing, you start running out of customers...quick. When you DON'T cure, and you treat the symptoms, you have a customer for "life".

If I sell you a house I get a profit. If I rent you the house, I get MORE profit and when you "leave", someone else moves in right away. I start collecting rent again.

I just don't see how an upfront profit beats a long term profit. Cancer occurrences are increasing, meaning more "rent"...curing them would make them go down and after a few years, you'd have NO business left.

I am thinking...

What if the "cure" requires a monthly injection???
Not just a treatment that the cancer eventually kills you anyway, but a complete cure, as long as you continue the injections?? Now if there was a prevention, a vaccine against all forms of cancer, you might have a point. Some food for thought.

Originally Posted by Guest

What if the "cure" requires a monthly injection???
Not just a treatment that the cancer eventually kills you anyway, but a complete cure, as long as you continue the injections?? Now if there was a prevention, a vaccine against all forms of cancer, you might have a point. Some food for thought.

A "cure" doesn't need ANYTHING after it's given. If you need maintenance, you're not cured, you have what we have now. Drugs that keep you "alive".

Simple Definition of cure. : something (such as a drug or medical treatment) that stops a disease and makes someone healthy again

We agree. we define cure differently. We'll all remain on the monthly installment plan.

Economics rules all.

Originally Posted by Guest

The Cancer Industry is Too Prosperous to Allow a Cure

Pretty "sickening"

Money, it's all they care about.

The food industry "causes" it, and then the medical industry "treats" it.

I have been telling people about this for a while now... There are 2 known cures since the early 80's. It drives people crazy when I tell them there is no such thing as breast cancer... But they choose to believe what they are told. Cancer is real... But it is a disease that manifests itself into abnormal cell growth. (The symptom). It is aggressive, opportunistic - and seeks weakness. The medical industry pretends that a tumor in the breast is breast cancer... Wrong - it is cancer - period. So donating money to this research is...well.... CPB (cut, poison and burn) are treatments used by the medical industry to get wealthy at the expense of the American people - while their loved ones die. God is allowing this info to come out now... Luke 8:17

Stan Burzynski of Houston Texas has had a cure for stage 4 and under since the mid 70's. Who do you think is trying to sue him and take away his license?

Alzheimer's disease is another one where the truth is not out. It is is a nutritional deficiency... They discovered this in the 1950's... It was called encephalomalacia... Ask your doctor about that... He/she will nor know.. And will poo-poo it. Idiots.

Since the mid 80's... Correction

So what is it? The 2 cures...

Originally Posted by Guest

Think again. If unsuccessfully "treating" cancer is "profitable", how much do you think they could sell "the cure" for??????

Not much one time sell don't get you that rich. It's the over and over treatment with 900% markup on drugs that don't cure just keep you in the game till check mate.

Who cares? Is this political?

Originally Posted by Guest

Not much one time sell don't get you that rich. It's the over and over treatment with 900% markup on drugs that don't cure just keep you in the game till check mate.

Yup...and he suggested that "I" do some thinking. Renting to someone is ALWAYS more profitable than selling outright. Why cure you and never see your checkbook again when I can "lease you more life" for ONLY a "small" monthly payment.

Originally Posted by Guest

Who cares? Is this political?

Politicians did this to us...doesn't that make it political?

Do we need another "forum", the "truth" forum where we only talk about common lies and misconceptions?