Take a good look at the people who turn out for a Trump rally .
Then look at the people who show up to cheer on Clinton .

Workers and providers show up for Trump .

Takers and social program beneficiaries show up for her .

Originally Posted by Guest

Take a good look at the people who turn out for a Trump rally .
Then look at the people who show up to cheer on Clinton .

Workers and providers show up for Trump .

Takers and social program beneficiaries show up for her .

True, but when you consider that there are more 'takers' than 'makers', Hillary may have a edge at the poles...provided the 'takers' actually show up to vote.

Originally Posted by Guest

Take a good look at the people who turn out for a Trump rally .
Then look at the people who show up to cheer on Clinton .

Workers and providers show up for Trump .

Takers and social program beneficiaries show up for her .

This may be the most naive post ever on this forum.

Crowd size ? Means what ?

Trump is a stand up and crowds love his "schtick".

The country would be better served if both candidates spoke on issues.

Crowds love it for some reason when he attacks groups like non christian conservatives as he did yesterday.

What is going on.

Originally Posted by Guest

This may be the most naive post ever on this forum.

Crowd size ? Means what ?

Trump is a stand up and crowds love his "schtick".

The country would be better served if both candidates spoke on issues.

You missed my point -- it is that while Trump does very large crowds of hard working providers .

Due to the fact that this is now a Nation dominated by the " Takers " that even with her small crowd turnout she will win .
Now how is that naive ?

make that " Trump does draw "

Originally Posted by Guest

You missed my point -- it is that while Trump does very large crowds of hard working providers .

Due to the fact that this is now a Nation dominated by the " Takers " that even with her small crowd turnout she will win .
Now how is that naive ?

I do not do well with all the labels you used.

I never liked labeling people as anything based on anything so I better step back.

I suppose the labeling of everyone is of some value to someone

Originally Posted by Guest

Due to the fact that this is now a Nation dominated by the " Takers " that even with her small crowd turnout she will win .
Now how is that naive ?

Yes all 52% of the nation on government assistance (the "takers") will be at the polls. Hillary, Obama, and Buffet will bus them in. Not too long after she is elected; the US's Standard & Poors rating will drop again, countries we are indebted to will come to collect, US will bankrupt (think Greece) and the checks to the takers will stop, most of them have developed a sense of entitlement, they will rebel and Civil War II will begin.
The sick and old will be targeted first...Stock up on AMMO!

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes all 52% of the nation on government assistance (the "takers") will be at the polls. Hillary, Obama, and Buffet will bus them in. Not too long after she is elected; the US's Standard & Poors rating will drop again, countries we are indebted to will come to collect, US will bankrupt (think Greece) and the checks to the takers will stop, most of them have developed a sense of entitlement, they will rebel and Civil War II will begin.
The sick and old will be targeted first...Stock up on AMMO!

Eventually this will take place given the unyielding downward spiral of this once great nation .

Originally Posted by Guest

Eventually this will take place given the unyielding downward spiral of this once great nation .

I agree, I wonder how many of those living during the 'roaring twenties' foresaw the 'depression of the the thirties'.

Originally Posted by Guest

I agree, I wonder how many of those living during the 'roaring twenties' foresaw the 'depression of the the thirties'.

One guy by the name of Joseph P. Kennedy saw it coming and shorted the market big time .

So eventually FDR put him in charge of the first version of what is now the SEC .

Originally Posted by Guest

I agree, I wonder how many of those living during the 'roaring twenties' foresaw the 'depression of the the thirties'.

Not as many foreseen as would have liked to...

One difference between Cival War II and the depression of the 30's: People will not be jumping out the windows, or off the roof tops, of buildings because they lost it all...they will be thrown out, or off, for what they have by a person that has been ingrained with a sense of entitlement thru generations of handouts.

Stock up on AMMO!

Originally Posted by Guest

Not as many foreseen as would have liked to...

One difference between Cival War II and the depression of the 30's: People will not be jumping out the windows, or off the roof tops, of buildings because they lost it all...they will be thrown out, or off, for what they have by a person that has been ingrained with a sense of entitlement thru generations of handouts.

Stock up on AMMO!

The good people turning out in huge numbers to participate in a Trump rally see this election as the last hope for our Nation .

We are destroying ourselves from within . How much longer can we last with open borders , thought policing in the form of PC madness ,
a dumbed down electorate , a weak military , distrustful allies , and leaders who are committed to UN Rule / Globalism .

Originally Posted by Guest

The good people turning out in huge numbers to participate in a Trump rally see this election as the last hope for our Nation .

We are destroying ourselves from within . How much longer can we last with open borders , thought policing in the form of PC madness ,
a dumbed down electorate , a weak military , distrustful allies , and leaders who are committed to UN Rule / Globalism .