I think that people fact check Trump , but no one fact checks Hillary . If you goto the “fact check “ sites it is all about Trump . I know they are biased if they don’t mention anything Hillary has done .

Originally Posted by Guest

I think that people fact check Trump , but no one fact checks Hillary . If you goto the “fact check “ sites it is all about Trump . I know they are biased if they don’t mention anything Hillary has done .

Originally Posted by Guest

I think that people fact check Trump , but no one fact checks Hillary . If you goto the “fact check “ sites it is all about Trump . I know they are biased if they don’t mention anything Hillary has done .

BS. Check them again.

like what ones? is Poltifact a Clinton owned site , I never see anything bad about her you goto that page and it is all bad about trump

My bad , I was not moving the page down enough . I see bad stuff about Obama and Hillary now . Maybe fact check site is for real?

If you want to check something out, check out the director of the FBI. His involvement with the Clinton Foundation. His brother's involvement and ties to the Clintons. It's an interesting study, if you are interested in relationships of the corrupted. How much did the Clintons donate to Comey?

Originally Posted by Guest

If you want to check something out, check out the director of the FBI. His involvement with the Clinton Foundation. His brother's involvement and ties to the Clintons. It's an interesting study, if you are interested in relationships of the corrupted. How much did the Clintons donate to Comey?

Comey looks like a very honorable man. Shame on you!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Comey looks like a very honorable man. Shame on you!!!

I thought so too. But, I am starting to question the reason why he blatantly refused to recommend indictment when there is so much evidence of her violating federal law. A city cop could get a conviction on just the evidence available to the public. I know that I could.

That made me look into Comey a bit and have found some interesting statements regarding his relationship with the Clintons. I am doing some checking before I put this stuff out there, even though it is already starting to move about the Internet. But rumors should be checked before absolutes put out regarding someone's reputation. He did open himself up to criticism when he listed all of Hillary's violations and then recommend no legal action.

Originally Posted by Guest

I thought so too. But, I am starting to question the reason why he blatantly refused to recommend indictment when there is so much evidence of her violating federal law. A city cop could get a conviction on just the evidence available to the public. I know that I could.

That made me look into Comey a bit and have found some interesting statements regarding his relationship with the Clintons. I am doing some checking before I put this stuff out there, even though it is already starting to move about the Internet. But rumors should be checked before absolutes put out regarding someone's reputation. He did open himself up to criticism when he listed all of Hillary's violations and then recommend no legal action.

Oh please cut the santimonious BS. The DOJ and the Attorney General are calling the shots as to what does not get done to the Clintons. As directed to them by Obama.

They have been directed to give her a pass so as to not expose Obama who is implicitly involved in many of the charges that are possible against Clinton.

He is covering for her so she won't drag him in and down the rat hole. He is more than embarassingly campaigning for her because he needs her in the WH to cover his a$$ and "preserve" his BS legacy and not get prosecuted for any wrong doing.

This is the tip of the ice berg establishment that are freaking out about Trump winning.