What about this Trump connection to Russia and Putin ?

I am concerned about this , I am going to vote for him still( I think)but why is he so fond of Putin . Just trying to see if there is any truth to this


thank you for your though-full comments

Originally Posted by Guest

What about this Trump connection to Russia and Putin ?

I am concerned about this , I am going to vote for him still( I think)but why is he so fond of Putin . Just trying to see if there is any truth to this


thank you for your though-full comments

It pales compared to the Pay for Play and the compromises the Clintons have created across the globe .

Originally Posted by Guest

What about this Trump connection to Russia and Putin ?

I am concerned about this , I am going to vote for him still( I think)but why is he so fond of Putin . Just trying to see if there is any truth to this


thank you for your though-full comments

Fondness does not bother me.

Do you want your president to be PERSONALLY IN DEBT to Russia in the billions ?
Do you want your President to make foreign policy decisions knowing it could affect his PERSONAL fortune ?

can you reference a reliable source , I so dont know who is telliing the truth on int internets . I am overloaded by news and what is the accurate source the BBC?

Originally Posted by Guest

can you reference a reliable source , I so dont know who is telliing the truth on int internets . I am overloaded by news and what is the accurate source the BBC?

Here are a few...

Donald Trump's Many, Many, Many, Many Ties to Russia

Trump Advisor Under Investigation for Russia Ties: Report | Foreign Policy

Inside Trump’s financial ties to Russia and his unusual flattery of Vladimir Putin - The Washington Post

Originally Posted by Guest

Fondness does not bother me.

Do you want your president to be PERSONALLY IN DEBT to Russia in the billions ?
Do you want your President to make foreign policy decisions knowing it could affect his PERSONAL fortune ?

Can't tell whether you are talking about Trump or Clinton.

Nah must be Trump. The list of who Clinton will be beholding to is way, WAY longer and jaded.

Originally Posted by Guest

What about this Trump connection to Russia and Putin ?

I am concerned about this , I am going to vote for him still( I think)but why is he so fond of Putin . Just trying to see if there is any truth to this


thank you for your though-full comments

I believe if you are willing to check, you will find that Hillary has more ties to Putin or Russia than Trump.

You might ask yourself how Russia got her(as SecState) to approve the sale of 20% of the world's uranium. Interesting how there was a large donation to the Clinton Foundation.

Since George Soros was a large donor to both Obama and Hillary, does that mean he has power over them? He is nasty fellow, isn't he?
Since Bill Ayers was Obama's friend and also a former domestic terrorists that bombed the gov, does that mean Obama is a terrorist sympathizer?

Originally Posted by Guest

I believe if you are willing to check, you will find that Hillary has more ties to Putin or Russia than Trump.

You might ask yourself how Russia got her(as SecState) to approve the sale of 20% of the world's uranium. Interesting how there was a large donation to the Clinton Foundation.

The company in question, Uranium One, does have mines, mills and tracts of land in Wyoming, Utah and other U.S. states equal to about 20 percent of U.S. uranium production capacity. It churns out a smaller portion of actual uranium produced in the United States (11 percent in 2014), according to Oilprice.com.

But that’s less cause for alarm than Trump is suggesting.

For one, the United States doesn’t actually produce all that much uranium (about 2 percent in 2015) and is actually a net importer of the chemical, according to Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at Middlebury Institute and former director at the New America Foundation.



So it goes from 20% of the worlds amount to 11% times 2% = .22%

Originally Posted by Guest

The company in question, Uranium One, does have mines, mills and tracts of land in Wyoming, Utah and other U.S. states equal to about 20 percent of U.S. uranium production capacity. It churns out a smaller portion of actual uranium produced in the United States (11 percent in 2014), according to Oilprice.com.

But that’s less cause for alarm than Trump is suggesting.

For one, the United States doesn’t actually produce all that much uranium (about 2 percent in 2015) and is actually a net importer of the chemical, according to Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at Middlebury Institute and former director at the New America Foundation.



So it goes from 20% of the worlds amount to 11% times 2% = .22%

Just keep on researching about these candidates before voting!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

The company in question, Uranium One, does have mines, mills and tracts of land in Wyoming, Utah and other U.S. states equal to about 20 percent of U.S. uranium production capacity. It churns out a smaller portion of actual uranium produced in the United States (11 percent in 2014), according to Oilprice.com.

But that’s less cause for alarm than Trump is suggesting.

For one, the United States doesn’t actually produce all that much uranium (about 2 percent in 2015) and is actually a net importer of the chemical, according to Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at Middlebury Institute and former director at the New America Foundation.



So it goes from 20% of the worlds amount to 11% times 2% = .22%

I forgot the link
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...inton-got-pai/

Originally Posted by Guest

The company in question, Uranium One, does have mines, mills and tracts of land in Wyoming, Utah and other U.S. states equal to about 20 percent of U.S. uranium production capacity. It churns out a smaller portion of actual uranium produced in the United States (11 percent in 2014), according to Oilprice.com.

But that’s less cause for alarm than Trump is suggesting.

For one, the United States doesn’t actually produce all that much uranium (about 2 percent in 2015) and is actually a net importer of the chemical, according to Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at Middlebury Institute and former director at the New America Foundation.



So it goes from 20% of the worlds amount to 11% times 2% = .22%

I believe the subject is ties to Russia. Do we really need a chemistry lesson?

If your point is to make Hilary's relationship comparison to Russia less relevant because of the percentage of chemical involved, I do not see your point.

Since someone is worried about Trump's business with Russia, I guess they should be worried about his business in Asia also. He does have business in the Middle East also. It's a good thing that Hillary has no ties to other countries..........

Originally Posted by Guest

I believe the subject is ties to Russia. Do we really need a chemistry lesson?

If your point is to make Hilary's relationship comparison to Russia less relevant because of the percentage of chemical involved, I do not see your point.

Since someone is worried about Trump's business with Russia, I guess they should be worried about his business in Asia also. He does have business in the Middle East also. It's a good thing that Hillary has no ties to other countries..........

Most people would do a bit of investigation and find that those countries benefited from the Clinton Foundation CHARITIES, as many countries through out the world have done, but then I suppose that means little to you.

BUT...keep your eye on the ongoing investigations of the Trump Foundation, a shallow chinese wall to launder money.

Or, since you like the wild and wholly...

"An anonymous “Jane Doe” filed a federal lawsuit against GOP presumptive nominee Donald Trump last week, accusing him of raping her in 1994 when she was thirteen years old. The mainstream media ignored the filing."

Why The New Child Rape Case Filed Against Donald Trump Should Not Be Ignored | Huffington Post

Will not come to trial until after the election like the fraud cases in a few states on Trump Univ, or the ongoing investigation into Trump Foundation.

"The Donald J. Trump Foundation has raised very little money over the years and appears to have done little in the way of charitable giving. That’s not the scandal, however. More troubling is the way in which Trump has funded his foundation and then used its resources. "

The Trump Foundation looks like a personal piggybank.

Just some more "anecdotal BS"

"Updated | A company controlled by Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for president, secretly conducted business in Communist Cuba during Fidel Castro’s presidency despite strict American trade bans that made such undertakings illegal, according to interviews with former Trump executives, internal company records and court filings."

How Donald Trump’s Company Violated the United States Embargo Against Cuba

Of course nothing is this mans fault..

Originally Posted by Guest

I believe the subject is ties to Russia. Do we really need a chemistry lesson?

If your point is to make Hilary's relationship comparison to Russia less relevant because of the percentage of chemical involved, I do not see your point.

Since someone is worried about Trump's business with Russia, I guess they should be worried about his business in Asia also. He does have business in the Middle East also. It's a good thing that Hillary has no ties to other countries..........

I was responding to a previous post on this thread.
I believe if you are willing to check, you will find that Hillary has more ties to Putin or Russia than Trump.

You might ask yourself how Russia got her(as SecState) to approve the sale of 20% of the world's uranium. Interesting how there was a large donation to the Clinton Foundation.
Pay for Play aside the percentage is more like .22% and not 20% of the world's uranium supply. Just like you I like to check what is posted to what is accurate.

I am explaining my post just to be polite.