Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Supported the Clinton since 1990s and has been a democratic Polster even longer than that he feels that there will be a constitutional crisis if Hillary Clinton is of elected with all of this information hanging over her head. Worse than during President Nixons term. THIS IS BIG NEWS!!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Link?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow!!!
More may follow, we all assume they spotted enough content in state.gov & clinton.com email headers to to push Comey to act. He was strong supporter since 1994, Fox news panelist. Utube has the clip live on Fox |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Douglas Schoen is an American political analyst, pollster, author, and commentator. He is a political analyst for Fox News and a columnist for Newsmax. He partnered with political strategist Mark Penn and Michael Berland in the firm of Penn, Schoen & Berland.
I had to look this guy up. He is someone to take seriously. I did know who Scott Baio was. He is someone to take seriously too. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't forget there are also 4 separate FBIInvestigations into the Clinton Foundation. Tens of millions funnelled from CGI to Teneo to Bill Clinton.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sure thing I will do this for you : it`s called " GOOGLE " . ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Assistant Director and CNN law enforcement analyst Tom Fuentes appeared on-air Saturday night to discuss the circumstances surrounding the letter FBI Director James Comey sent to lawmakers on Friday. Citing his sources at the FBI, Fuentes explained that there was a lot of context surrounding the Comey letter that was not being discussed by the media. Specifically, Fuentes said the newly discovered emails are also believed to be related to an ongoing FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundation. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Google it. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Funny how no one threatened Comey with a crime when he said he was not recommending that Hillary be indicted. What changed??? ![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tis a royal mess. Schoen definitely has a valid point that the emails will probably be an issue for at least the first few months of Hillary's Presidency. It's too late for her to withdraw, even if she wanted to -- too many have already voted. Sadly, even if I could change my vote, I wouldn't. Donald Trump has shown he has no filter, not a great quality in a world leader. This is the saddest election I think America has ever been subjected to. Neither candidate deserves our vote or support. Here's hoping America can survive and that we get far better choices next time.
Red |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You do know that what she did was a violation of national security, right? And that she could be responsible for the deaths of at least four Americans, if not more? She is also complicit in the illegal sale of arms to our enemies. Are these issues excusable in your view? I do not understand how liberals can be so nonchalant when it comes to something as serious as this. I thought we were ALL Americans, not just the right. Liberals act like they are in an ideological war where everything nasty and dirty goes, including hiring thugs to commit violence against the right. It seems that the right are the ones willing to abstain from becoming physical in politics. And we are the ones with all the guns, so that makes us even more responsible when comparing. I did not vote for Trump in the primary as I still believe others were better for the position. However, when comparing his total vetting by the left with the obvious criminal activity of Hillary, he is the choice between the two. Compare his language in private with Hillary's and you will find that Hillary's vocabulary is more nasty, with her consistent use of the "F" word when addressing almost every issue. Compare his supposed accusations of "kissing" some girls without their permission to Hillary's violation of national security. I still do not believe that Trump is the perfect candidate for the job, but in comparison there is no contest. He is the only choice available. I also believe that he will do a better job of putting America back together again after all the division of the past 8 years. Unless you on the left are totally blind and deaf, you knew that Hillary had some serious baggage coming into the is campaign. Why you chose her is a puzzle at best. The left has many that are far better choices that they could have chosen from, including one that ran early in the campaign, Webb. Not that I know much about him, but he seemed much more competent than Hillary. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quite simply, I voted (past tense, so can't change it anyway) for several reasons. The main one is Trump has no filter, none whatsoever. If he thinks it, he says it. If he wants it, he grabs it. If he's mad, he'll have a temper tantrum. If you get him mad, he'll get even. I don't want someone like that having the power to push a nuclear button. Also, as I've said previously, Hillary is closer to my core beliefs -- birth control, education ... I don't like all of her past deeds. Her email server issue showed poor judgment, which doesn't thrill me but I can't put it at a criminal level. I blame the State Department as a whole rather than just Clinton for Benghazi. My big issues and questions go to the Clinton Foundation, its donors and fees paid to the Clintons. I'm still trying to get more facts on those questions. I did not vote blindly nor emotionally. I read and listened to people on both sides of the aisle and found as many neutral sources as possible for Clinton's issues. I ignored conjecture, rumors, campaign rhetoric as much as possible. Trump actually took little research. It was simply a matter of watching him in action over the past two years (I really did pretty much ignore the garbage he spewed prior to that).
Red |
|
|