New York Times Will Vacate 8 Floors In Its HQ To Generate "Significant Rental Revenue"

Their base has declined soooo much with their BS liberal take they are hurting.





Dear Colleagues,
When we moved into our new building in 2007, we saw it as a modern headquarters for a modern New York Times. We still feel that way.

But as Mark mentioned in the State of The Times last month, after a good deal of consideration, we have determined that the way that we use our headquarters building needs to evolve to better match the changes you and your colleagues have been driving across every part of the company.

The current way we have configured our office makes us slower and less collaborative. It is also, frankly, too expensive to occupy this many floors when we don’t truly need them.

We’ve made the decision to consolidate our footprint across the building to create a more dynamic, modern and open workplace, one that is better suited to the moment. We’re planning significant investments in a redesign of our existing space in order to facilitate more cross-departmental collaboration.

We expect a substantial financial benefit as well. All told, we will vacate at least eight floors, allowing us to generate significant rental income.

We have engaged Gensler, an architecture and interior design firm, to help us redesign our workplace and beginning early next year, work will begin on select floors below 14. By the end of next year, we expect to have consolidated our occupancy to that side of the building. We will keep the cafeteria and the conference rooms on 15.



We have already seen that changing office layouts can lead to good results. Some of the most creative wings of the company — the Beta team, the Graphics Department and some of our technology teams have changed their floor plans to help improve the way they work.



The coming redesign will introduce more team rooms and common spaces. And, we will do away with big corner offices, like the ones you see on the 16th and 17th floors, including, yes, the publisher and CEO’s offices. We don’t need to preserve those vestiges from a different era, so we won’t.



In the end, these changes will impact every employee at 620 Eighth Ave. In the near term, we will have to move about 400 employees out of the building to nearby office space while the first phase of work is completed. We expect that group, which includes parts of marketing, technology, the newsroom, news services, corporate finance and print products and services pre-press operations, to move in the first quarter and return by the end of 2017. Your manager will notify you if your position is affected by this temporary move. We understand and appreciate the disruption this will inevitably cause and we will do everything in our power to mitigate it.



Representatives from across the company are serving on a steering committee to help us plan these changes. They will solicit input from everyone interested in providing it and we’re committed to keeping you fully informed as the project plays out.



We will have more details soon.



Thank you.
Arthur and Mark

Originally Posted by Guest

New York Times Will Vacate 8 Floors In Its HQ To Generate "Significant Rental Revenue"

Their base has declined soooo much with their BS liberal take they are hurting.





Dear Colleagues,
When we moved into our new building in 2007, we saw it as a modern headquarters for a modern New York Times. We still feel that way.

But as Mark mentioned in the State of The Times last month, after a good deal of consideration, we have determined that the way that we use our headquarters building needs to evolve to better match the changes you and your colleagues have been driving across every part of the company.

The current way we have configured our office makes us slower and less collaborative. It is also, frankly, too expensive to occupy this many floors when we don’t truly need them.

We’ve made the decision to consolidate our footprint across the building to create a more dynamic, modern and open workplace, one that is better suited to the moment. We’re planning significant investments in a redesign of our existing space in order to facilitate more cross-departmental collaboration.

We expect a substantial financial benefit as well. All told, we will vacate at least eight floors, allowing us to generate significant rental income.

We have engaged Gensler, an architecture and interior design firm, to help us redesign our workplace and beginning early next year, work will begin on select floors below 14. By the end of next year, we expect to have consolidated our occupancy to that side of the building. We will keep the cafeteria and the conference rooms on 15.



We have already seen that changing office layouts can lead to good results. Some of the most creative wings of the company — the Beta team, the Graphics Department and some of our technology teams have changed their floor plans to help improve the way they work.



The coming redesign will introduce more team rooms and common spaces. And, we will do away with big corner offices, like the ones you see on the 16th and 17th floors, including, yes, the publisher and CEO’s offices. We don’t need to preserve those vestiges from a different era, so we won’t.



In the end, these changes will impact every employee at 620 Eighth Ave. In the near term, we will have to move about 400 employees out of the building to nearby office space while the first phase of work is completed. We expect that group, which includes parts of marketing, technology, the newsroom, news services, corporate finance and print products and services pre-press operations, to move in the first quarter and return by the end of 2017. Your manager will notify you if your position is affected by this temporary move. We understand and appreciate the disruption this will inevitably cause and we will do everything in our power to mitigate it.



Representatives from across the company are serving on a steering committee to help us plan these changes. They will solicit input from everyone interested in providing it and we’re committed to keeping you fully informed as the project plays out.



We will have more details soon.



Thank you.
Arthur and Mark

Another plagiarized post. Read the site guidelines.

This used to be a secret site. Just recently, Bloomberg was able to unmask these guys.

The one who is interesting is a Bulgarian analyst from Wall St who was "worked for a hedge fund before being barred by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in 2008 for insider trading. He didn’t admit or deny wrongdoing, the agency said. Backshall is a familiar face on financial news networks who has been quoted by media outlets, including Bloomberg. His involvement with Zero Hedge, along with that of Lokey, hasn’t been widely known."

Unmasking the Men Behind Zero Hedge, Wall Street's Renegade Blog - Bloomberg


Not sure why you would want to read, let alone steal, from people who want to be secret
They must have lots of popular things to say (we know Russia loves them) as people on here keep stealing from them.

This site is part of the ZEROHEDGE family, which was plagerize and stolen from just recently.

The authors name is a made up name stolen from the movie "Fight Club"

As mentioned earlier...

"Zero Hedge's content is conspiratorial, anti-establishment, and economically pessimistic,[3] and has been criticized for presenting extreme and sometimes pro-Russian views.[1][4][5]"
R
Zero Hedge - Wikipedia

This TOTV certainly is not moderated as some mention.

This seems to be the norm...stealing and plagiarizing. Ignoring US law, and TOTV rules.

Not sure if I am correct, but could this not possibly lead to the parent site either facing fines or just disappearing. I am not that bright on forums, copyright law, etc, but surely is a habit on here.

BUT we get the Russian point of view !

Here is a link to see the article in its native state before being stolen.


Commonsense & Wonder: New York Time Will Vacate 8 Floors In Its HQ To Generate "Significant Rental Revenue". Bolshevism takes another hit.

There is quite a few "pro Russian" sites now carrying the same article with slightly different lead ins, but with the same made up by line

Originally Posted by Guest

Another plagiarized post. Read the site guidelines.

When the truth hurts change the subject and attack !

We just love you sore losers !! Ha-Ha Grannie !!

NY Times is just the first of several so called major dailies which are in deep financial trouble .

They led the way to change the nature of public education in America toward indoctrination . Consequently they have helped foster several generations of adults who no longer read any papers . They destroyed their audience and now they are expendable . Bye-bye !!

Originally Posted by Guest

When the truth hurts change the subject and attack !

We just love you sore losers !! Ha-Ha Grannie !!

Actually, it is just simply that I do not like people who steal and plagiarize. I also do not like to patronize pro Russian sites.

Just funny I guess.

Originally Posted by Guest

Another plagiarized post. Read the site guidelines.

In my opinion,the OP did nothing to conceal the thread was copied and pasted. It was submitted simply for a read. Whether one believes the article's content or meaning thereof is left to the individual. However several websites have made mention that the New York Times lost subscriptions .

I have no dog in this in fight except I would not define the OP's use here as plagiarism

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Another plagiarized post. Read the site guidelines.

boo hooo!

Originally Posted by Guest

Actually, it is just simply that I do not like people who steal and plagiarize. I also do not like to patronize pro Russian sites.

Just funny I guess.

Funny as in Ha, ha, or funny as in queer?

plagiarized, my ass!

it wasn't passed off as the OP own words.

Who gives a crap where or how it was posted.

I love it when folks come on here and whine about some technicality (in their mind) rather then discuss the issue.

If you have nothing to add why bother posting, get a life

Bottom line is the NYT is no longer the 800 pound gorilla in the room like CNN and other liberal MSM

Someone asked what the abbr MSM means
Main Stream Media

Originally Posted by Guest

plagiarized, my ass!

it wasn't passed off as the OP own words.

Who gives a crap where or how it was posted.

I love it when folks come on here and whine about some technicality (in their mind) rather then discuss the issue.

If you have nothing to add why bother posting, get a life

Bottom line is the NYT is no longer the 800 pound gorilla in the room like CNN and other liberal MSM

Someone asked what the abbr MSM means
Main Stream Media

1. Posting another's words on here as an individual post is plagiarism. It is also a violation of TOTV rules.

2. Where it came from is important since the Times is completely renovating their building. The pro Russian website will always present in such a manner as to be negative. The renting issue seems to headline the Russian point of view attempting to make it sound like that is the core of the story. Actually it is simply an internal announcement of redecorating.

3. Explain the issue you had in mind when you cut and pasted ? Do you want to discuss the Times building renovation.

Finally, my looking at links is tied to the constant tearing down of American institutions, and the Fact that thevRussian tact in Eastern Europe is to do just that. They are now making inroads now in our country. Read what is happening in Europe.

Those that complain about plagiarism on a political forum are likely those that sued the learning center.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920AZ using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

Those that complain about plagiarism on a political forum are likely those that sued the learning center.

Those that plagiarize and cut/paste without providing a link in their post...are the types that have never had an original thought of their own.