Irrigating Our Lawns

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-16-2017, 07:29 AM
jalopy54's Avatar
jalopy54 jalopy54 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Village of Pinellas
Posts: 133
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to jalopy54
Default Irrigating Our Lawns

Is there still a water band? If so why? Looks to me like if villagers would all water there lawns. The flooded areas would recede?
__________________
Tennessee, Ohio, Kentucky, Ohio, Illinois, Ohio, Indiana, Ohio, The Villages.

Mickey
  #2  
Old 09-16-2017, 07:44 AM
Ooper's Avatar
Ooper Ooper is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jalopy54 View Post
Is there still a water band? If so why? Looks to me like if villagers would all water there lawns. The flooded areas would recede?
??? Turning on my irrigation would just up my water bill.
__________________
Oswego, NY
Love The Villages
  #3  
Old 09-16-2017, 08:23 AM
CWGUY CWGUY is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,879
Thanks: 4,275
Thanked 1,662 Times in 728 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jalopy54 View Post
Is there still a water band? If so why? Looks to me like if villagers would all water there lawns. The flooded areas would recede?
  #4  
Old 09-16-2017, 09:19 AM
MrGolf MrGolf is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 407
Thanks: 3
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
Default

The OP asked a simple question. The answer is yes, there still is a ban. That might change but as of today, yes.
  #5  
Old 09-16-2017, 09:22 AM
dnobles dnobles is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 383
Thanks: 123
Thanked 98 Times in 49 Posts
Default

It's nice to see someone be kind and just answer the question.
  #6  
Old 09-16-2017, 09:43 AM
Polar Bear Polar Bear is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 222
Thanked 951 Times in 382 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dnobles View Post
It's nice to see someone be kind and just answer the question.
Yes. It does happen on occasion.
  #7  
Old 09-16-2017, 10:05 AM
l2ridehd's Avatar
l2ridehd l2ridehd is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridgeport At Miona Shores
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 1
Thanked 353 Times in 122 Posts
Send a message via AIM to l2ridehd
Default

By keeping this surcharge in place the water district has caused the flooding problem to be worse than necessary. They have created an environment that has increased the damages in TV by 100's of thousands of $$$$$. From about a month before Irma and to the current day there is NO irrigation water issue. If they were to argue there still is than a ban on new construction should be put in place immediately.

The ban and continued building should not go hand in hand. Either the water district is using the surcharge as a revenue rape of all of us, or the shortage is real and TV should stop building.

You can't have it both ways.
__________________
Life is to short to drink cheap wine.
  #8  
Old 09-16-2017, 10:11 AM
CWGUY CWGUY is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,879
Thanks: 4,275
Thanked 1,662 Times in 728 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jalopy54 View Post
Is there still a water band? If so why? Looks to me like if villagers would all water there lawns. The flooded areas would recede?
Is there still a water band? YES If so why? WE DON'T GET A SAY Looks to me like if villagers would all water there lawns. The flooded areas would recede? NO.... THAT'S NOT WHERE THE WATER COMES FROM
  #9  
Old 09-16-2017, 10:31 AM
tuccillo tuccillo is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,101
Thanks: 4
Thanked 411 Times in 218 Posts
Default

OK, I'll bite. Please explain your reasoning for such a statement.


Quote:
Originally Posted by l2ridehd View Post
By keeping this surcharge in place the water district has caused the flooding problem to be worse than necessary. They have created an environment that has increased the damages in TV by 100's of thousands of $$$$$. From about a month before Irma and to the current day there is NO irrigation water issue. If they were to argue there still is than a ban on new construction should be put in place immediately.

The ban and continued building should not go hand in hand. Either the water district is using the surcharge as a revenue rape of all of us, or the shortage is real and TV should stop building.

You can't have it both ways.
  #10  
Old 09-16-2017, 10:36 AM
CWGUY CWGUY is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,879
Thanks: 4,275
Thanked 1,662 Times in 728 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuccillo View Post
OK, I'll bite. Please explain your reasoning for such a statement.
Don't you find it amazing?
  #11  
Old 09-16-2017, 10:36 AM
perrjojo's Avatar
perrjojo perrjojo is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mission Hills
Posts: 2,294
Thanks: 226
Thanked 321 Times in 78 Posts
Default

I have used my irrigation system twice since the water ban. Why? Because it rains nearly every day and I don't need too.
  #12  
Old 09-16-2017, 10:41 AM
tuccillo tuccillo is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,101
Thanks: 4
Thanked 411 Times in 218 Posts
Default

Bingo! I turned my off on June 1 and haven't turned in back on since.

Quote:
Originally Posted by perrjojo View Post
I have used my irrigation system twice since the water ban. Why? Because it rains nearly every day and I don't need too.
  #13  
Old 09-16-2017, 11:24 AM
l2ridehd's Avatar
l2ridehd l2ridehd is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridgeport At Miona Shores
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 1
Thanked 353 Times in 122 Posts
Send a message via AIM to l2ridehd
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuccillo View Post
OK, I'll bite. Please explain your reasoning for such a statement.
Because folks were not watering as much as usual because of the surcharge and ban, therefor the retention ponds were much higher than usual before Irma, which is where the irrigation water comes from, than with Irma the ponds overflowed and caused a lot of flooding and damage.

And for those that turned off the irrigation when the ban was put in place, I guess you don't care should you lose your lawn. Only costs about $20 grand to replace it. Yes we had a lot of rain and that may have prevented lawn damage, but suppose you were on vacation and it didn't rain?
__________________
Life is to short to drink cheap wine.
  #14  
Old 09-16-2017, 11:26 AM
Ooper's Avatar
Ooper Ooper is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooper View Post
??? Turning on my irrigation would just up my water bill.
Not trying to be smart... I didn't know if there is still a ban, but regardless, the statement the OP says doesn't make any sense. Running my irrigation would have absolutely no affect on the pond levels.
__________________
Oswego, NY
Love The Villages
  #15  
Old 09-16-2017, 11:31 AM
jalopy54's Avatar
jalopy54 jalopy54 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Village of Pinellas
Posts: 133
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to jalopy54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CWGUY View Post
Is there still a water band? YES If so why? WE DON'T GET A SAY Looks to me like if villagers would all water there lawns. The flooded areas would recede? NO.... THAT'S NOT WHERE THE WATER COMES FROM
Where does the water come from?
__________________
Tennessee, Ohio, Kentucky, Ohio, Illinois, Ohio, Indiana, Ohio, The Villages.

Mickey
Closed Thread

Tags
lawns, water, villagers, recede, areas


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM.