First Amendment / NFL Issue

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-25-2017, 07:23 PM
JGVillages JGVillages is offline
Gold member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: TV Calumet Grove
Posts: 1,204
Thanks: 74
Thanked 895 Times in 221 Posts
Default First Amendment / NFL Issue

First and foremost I support First Amendment rights. In this case Collin K had every right to speak his mind but I have two major issues with his delivery and the other players that now follow. First I believe the point he and other NFL players are attempting to protest is misdirected at our Flag and National Anthem, not whatever political or racial point they are trying to make. Secondly I currently pay DirecTv $$$$ for the NFL package, and enhanced sports package that gets me the NFL channel, ESPN, and other sports channels. I pay to watch, and periodically attend the game. I do not and will not pay to watch the extremely wealthy participants First Amendment views on any issue they choose. Many stadiums receive government subsidies which come from our tax dollars. If these protesters want to call a news conference outside their mansions, rent a hall, or purchase network time dedicated to their specific issues, then go for it, but they don’t dare do it when I am watching and contributing to the millions they are making. I will for my right to direct my limited entertainment dollars elsewhere. By the way, I pleasantly watched 10+ hours of golf this last weekend with zero first amendment political or racial issue addressed.
  #2  
Old 09-25-2017, 07:41 PM
Butterfly201 Butterfly201 is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 23
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default 1st Amendment / NFL Issue

I am not a sports person. I had major disagreement over the monthly cost of watching tv -- the very minimum cost I could get -- and cut the cord beginning today.
However after watching the news reports of all these NFL games with teams not acknowledging our flag by staying in a locker room !!! or showing no respect by "taking a knee" -- especially the team that did that in the U K --
I am ecstatic that I will not longer have to watch it on the news, hear it from the nightly tv hosts, etc.
They have had enough ??? I have had enough. They have a right -- I have a right. And I say you should respect the flag and our anthem every time. Take history lessons to learn why.
You want to dissent-- find another way. Do not show dissent to our flag and anthem. We love our country! You should too!
  #3  
Old 09-25-2017, 07:57 PM
Jayhawk's Avatar
Jayhawk Jayhawk is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,566
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1,888 Times in 560 Posts
Default

The 1st amendment applies only to government impeding speech. not employers. It is a crock of **** to refer to what the NFL players are doing as free speech.
  #4  
Old 09-25-2017, 09:02 PM
pauld315 pauld315 is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NY, FL, PA, TX, NC, TV
Posts: 1,497
Thanks: 43
Thanked 368 Times in 167 Posts
Default

I love the first amendment protections but I didn't have those at my workplace for all the years I worked.
__________________
"The secret of successful managing is to keep the five guys who hate you away from the four guys who haven't made up their minds." - Casey Stengel
  #5  
Old 09-25-2017, 09:03 PM
petsetc petsetc is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 346
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 223 Times in 97 Posts
Default

This is NOT a 1st Amendment issue. The employer has the right to dictate behavior so long as their requests are do not violate any law(s). That is, they can require players to stand and be silent during the national anthem, and if they fail to comply, the employer has the right to take action, subject to any contractual arrangements he may have entered into.

With that being said, POTUS has much more important issues that he should be dealing with rather than stirring this pot.

I have friends that still have concerns about DWB (Driving While Black) - when will we move beyond this hatred?
  #6  
Old 09-25-2017, 09:08 PM
Taltarzac725's Avatar
Taltarzac725 Taltarzac725 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 51,784
Thanks: 11,153
Thanked 4,034 Times in 2,438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petsetc View Post
This is NOT a 1st Amendment issue. The employer has the right to dictate behavior so long as their requests are do not violate any law(s). That is, they can require players to stand and be silent during the national anthem, and if they fail to comply, the employer has the right to take action, subject to any contractual arrangements he may have entered into.

With that being said, POTUS has much more important issues that he should be dealing with rather than stirring this pot.

I have friends that still have concerns about DWB (Driving While Black) - when will we move beyond this hatred?
Puerto Rico, North Korea, Health Care come to mind.

If the government is trying to influence employers then I would assume that any good lawyer could make an argument that the government is involved and that the First Amendment right to free speech applies.
  #7  
Old 09-25-2017, 09:11 PM
Pearson14505 Pearson14505 is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 0
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Bring back the draft and maybe they will have different views!
  #8  
Old 09-25-2017, 10:06 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,900
Thanks: 7,469
Thanked 6,149 Times in 3,160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawk View Post
The 1st amendment applies only to government impeding speech. not employers. It is a crock of **** to refer to what the NFL players are doing as free speech.
  #9  
Old 09-25-2017, 10:07 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,900
Thanks: 7,469
Thanked 6,149 Times in 3,160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 View Post
Puerto Rico, North Korea, Health Care come to mind.

If the government is trying to influence employers then I would assume that any good lawyer could make an argument that the government is involved and that the First Amendment right to free speech applies.

Good lawyer, that's oxymoron
  #10  
Old 09-25-2017, 10:07 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,900
Thanks: 7,469
Thanked 6,149 Times in 3,160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pearson14505 View Post
Bring back the draft and maybe they will have different views!
  #11  
Old 09-25-2017, 11:45 PM
Barefoot's Avatar
Barefoot Barefoot is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winters in TV, Summers in Canada.
Posts: 17,657
Thanks: 1,692
Thanked 244 Times in 185 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawk View Post
The 1st amendment applies only to government impeding speech. not employers. It is a crock of **** to refer to what the NFL players are doing as free speech.
Yep - a real crock.
__________________
Barefoot At Last
No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Saving one dog will not change the world, but surely for that one dog, the world will change forever.
  #12  
Old 09-26-2017, 05:20 AM
rubicon rubicon is offline
Email Reported As Spam
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Default

And because of identity politics another good thing in America bites the dust.

with Direct TV, Comcast, etc its referred to as their Sports and Entertainment package. As a paid viewer I am not entertained when a sports evident or movie misses its mark by sending me their brand of a political message.
I like my fictional characters to be non-political thank you.

As a side bar ESPN is owned by Disney. if you have been watching Disney has made a complete metamorphosis from family to x-rated adult and too political. Walt Disney must be turning in his grave

Personal Best Regards:
  #13  
Old 09-26-2017, 05:32 AM
simpilot simpilot is offline
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 61
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Forget the first amendment. Section 11 of the NFL standard player contract provides that “if Player has engaged in personal conduct reasonably judged by Club to adversely affect or reflect on Club, then Club may terminate this contract.” I think that covers the situation quite well.
  #14  
Old 09-26-2017, 05:44 AM
rubicon rubicon is offline
Email Reported As Spam
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Default

The underlying issue here, is the fact that too many citizens do not have an understanding of civics, of government of the US Constitution because it is no longer taught.

So what people do is invent rights as they go along in life

the first time I said to my Dad "Its not fair", he furrowed his brow and said "look at your birth certificate and tell me where it says you are guaranteed fairness in life."

Personal Best Regards:
  #15  
Old 09-26-2017, 06:37 AM
fw102807
Guest
Posts: n/a
Default

We'll see how committed to their cause they are when they start losing money.
Closed Thread

Tags
amendment, nfl, issue, pay, point


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.