After Rick Perry forgot something during the debate I was amazed at the press frenzy over such a minor thing.
Everyone in media on the left seems to think there is blood in the water and they are attacking beyond belief.
Now when Obama pointed out to us, to my surprise that we indeed had 57 states, I did not for a minute think he thought that or he was an idiot.
So why is it, really this is a question for the lefties on this forum, that Perry is unfit to run for office and is just a stupid Texan just like Bush because he forgot something under the pressure of the campaign?
I wonder if that is why Obama has EVERYTHING written for him and put on a teleprompter. Is it because he is an idiot? Probably not. So should we just allow teleprompters for everyone on the debates so they have the same advantage as the bully pulpit of the president?
It would be nice to see some real honesty from some of the dems on what they think about this instead of the party line.

Up until that point I think Perry was doing very well in articulating his positions. The media is going to attempt to destroy any Republican; any conservative. The mainstream media has lost all control after their success with Bork. Politics has been a sewer ever since.

BUT teleprompters are for speeches, when questioned by media on various subjects then you are on your own!!

Originally Posted by notlongnow

After Rick Perry forgot something during the debate I was amazed at the press frenzy over such a minor thing.
Everyone in media on the left seems to think there is blood in the water and they are attacking beyond belief.
Now when Obama pointed out to us, to my surprise that we indeed had 57 states, I did not for a minute think he thought that or he was an idiot.
So why is it, really this is a question for the lefties on this forum, that Perry is unfit to run for office and is just a stupid Texan just like Bush because he forgot something under the pressure of the campaign?
I wonder if that is why Obama has EVERYTHING written for him and put on a teleprompter. Is it because he is an idiot? Probably not. So should we just allow teleprompters for everyone on the debates so they have the same advantage as the bully pulpit of the president?
It would be nice to see some real honesty from some of the dems on what they think about this instead of the party line.

Perry has been wasting our air time from debate number one. Lets focus on Romney.

Originally Posted by The Villager II

Perry has been wasting our air time from debate number one. Lets focus on Romney.

No thanks, I'll keep on listening to all candidates on until the last one is standing, hopefully Cain.

Originally Posted by Loveithere

No thanks, I'll keep on listening to all candidates on until the last one is standing, hopefully Cain.

All the Dem's are hoping the same thing you are. I think I would go with Huntsman before Cain. I am afraid the non-Christian thing will hurt them.

Maybe Obama will do better in his second term.

Wonder why he is not on the Republican hit parade!!

Originally Posted by The Villager II

All the Dem's are hoping the same thing you are. I think I would go with Huntsman before Cain. I am afraid the non-Christian thing will hurt them.

Maybe Obama will do better in his second term.

Originally Posted by The Villager II

All the Dem's are hoping the same thing you are. I think I would go with Huntsman before Cain. I am afraid the non-Christian thing will hurt them.

Maybe Obama will do better in his second term.

Dems are played same game when we picked RINO McCain. Do not need a flip flop Romney.

Does not matter who get picked. They are all cut from the same cloth. Nothing will change, the congress will keep ingoring the Constitution, the President, whomever, will keep making Czars and guess who will keep getting screwed.

Originally Posted by The Villager II

All the Dem's are hoping the same thing you are. I think I would go with Huntsman before Cain. I am afraid the non-Christian thing will hurt them.

Maybe Obama will do better in his second term.

Seriously?; He might do better in his second term? A lame duck socialist inclined President with nothing to lose?

Better for who?

Originally Posted by The Villager II

Perry has been wasting our air time from debate number one. Lets focus on Romney.

Romney is stagnant; Gingrich in on the rise. Stay tuned.

We may be able to do much much better than the "father of ObamaCare" if the trends hold for a while.

Obama, the socialist and teleprompter reader, better hope that Gingrich doesn't win the nomination. Gingrich would wrap that twerp Obama around his little finger in a debate. It is not an urban myth that Gingrich is the smartest person when he steps into a room.

Any of ya'll collecting Social Security yet? Maybe you refuse it because it would make you a socialist possibly? Just curious.

Originally Posted by Posh 08

Any of ya'll collecting Social Security yet? Maybe you refuse it because it would make you a socialist possibly? Just curious.

You are kidding...right?
Money is TAKEN from the working person under the ruse that it will be put aside for that person's retirement. Then to collect it makes said person a socialist?
Since I am not a socialist...can I opt out and keep my money? Oh, guess not since there are not icicles in hell yet.

Originally Posted by KatzPajamas

You are kidding...right?
Money is TAKEN from the working person under the ruse that it will be put aside for that person's retirement. Then to collect it makes said person a socialist?
Since I am not a socialist...can I opt out and keep my money? Oh, guess not since there are not icicles in hell yet.

Nope, just notice the "Socialist" name calling here and was curious who was truly a believer in that. I now that it will lead to name calling on me and frankly I don't mind since the source means nothing to me.