I am very pleased with Romney in the front position and even more please where Bachmann and that weird guy from Texas are sitting.

who knows maybe another Senator will become a miracle dark horse coming from no where and winning as in the 2008 election!!

btk

Yeah, the Tea Party sure blew themselves up big time in Iowa. Michelle the Mouth is going to quit and slink back home. Freak Boy will go back to Texas and hopefully stay there.

Santorum is totally unelectable so let's hope that the evangical Republicans back him all the way.

Even Ann Coulter calls Ron Paul a "nut bar".

Good going in Iowa, guys.

Originally Posted by buggyone

Yeah, the Tea Party sure blew themselves up big time in Iowa. Michelle the Mouth is going to quit and slink back home. Freak Boy will go back to Texas and hopefully stay there.

Santorum is totally unelectable so let's hope that the evangical Republicans back him all the way.

Even Ann Coulter calls Ron Paul a "nut bar".

Good going in Iowa, guys.

I am very curious. Do you call everyone who disagrees with or has a little different philosophy than you a name ? Or is that just on this forum ?

Disagreeing and offering ones opinion is one thing....trying to be cute and demean those who disagree with you is quite another.

that is the MO Bucco.
I had a professor who viewed such antics/behavior as compensating.

I would ask for what commentary would be offered for the dems' pack of candidates when the were at the similar stumbling stage prior to the 2008 election.

I also wonder if some of the more vehement posters are not reincarnations of those who used to be so demeaning to everybody and anything that was not their party during 2007. So many have slid away, but some of the current crop has a familiar ring.

btk

I still think that Romney will just be a repeat of the current administration. Remember the phase "career politican." Not one of them, D or R is a statesman and has the best interest of the country in mind. Its all "what can I get for myself and my party, and to hell with the country and what's best for the American People."

Originally Posted by billethkid

that is the MO Bucco.
I had a professor who viewed such antics/behavior as compensating.

I would ask for what commentary would be offered for the dems' pack of candidates when the were at the similar stumbling stage prior to the 2008 election.

I also wonder if some of the more vehement posters are not reincarnations of those who used to be so demeaning to everybody and anything that was not their party during 2007. So many have slid away, but some of the current crop has a familiar ring.

btk

I thought the same thing BTK. Many of them sound like the folks here in 2007/2008 who just slung the mud and then disappeared as actual issues were discussed

Chances of Romney winning the nomination - 79.2%
Chances of Gingrich winning ............. - 4.1%
Chances of Santorum winning ................ - 5.5%
Chances of Paul winning ..................... - 1.9%


Chances of Obama winning reelection - 51.1%

Originally Posted by Figmo Bohica

I still think that Romney will just be a repeat of the current administration. Remember the phase "career politican." Not one of them, D or R is a statesman and has the best interest of the country in mind. Its all "what can I get for myself and my party, and to hell with the country and what's best for the American People."

I don't think so. One of the things I like about Romney is that he already has all the wealth and power a person could earn, and he is steady and devoted in his family life.

His love of this nation shows clearly at all times. That's not the case with the current administration.

Originally Posted by Bucco

I am very curious. Do you call everyone who disagrees with or has a little different philosophy than you a name ? Or is that just on this forum ?

Disagreeing and offering ones opinion is one thing....trying to be cute and demean those who disagree with you is quite another.

Libs use this strategy all of the time. It is right out of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. Check out Number 5!

Mitt Romney's a candidate even democrats could support. I remember voting for him when he ran for the senate in 1994. He was pro-choice, pro-gay rights, and pro-universal health care. Go Mitt.

Originally Posted by Number 6

Libs use this strategy all of the time. It is right out of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. Check out Number 5!

Exactly. They would mock and ridicule the discoverer of the cure for all types of cancer if he/she were a Republican.

Unfortunately for Mitt, he is about to receive the kiss of death.

A McCain endorsement. The cons will love that.

Mitt Romney believes marriage is between a man and a woman and another woman and another woman and another woman and another woman.

Originally Posted by janmcn

Mitt Romney believes marriage is between a man and a woman and another woman and another woman and another woman and another woman.

Can you provide a source for this?