Hilary Clinton hints she will be stepping down as soon as a replacement can be found and confirmed, even if President Obama is re-elected.

She is going to run. I have been saying that for some time

Republicans need a Paul ryan, chiris Cristie type to enter now

Originally Posted by rubicon

She is going to run. I have been saying that for some time

Run for what?
Did you read her remarks?

Originally Posted by rubicon

She is going to run. I have been saying that for some time

I think she's going to run for president in 2016, by "running for" V.P. this year.

She was very smiley and lovey-dovey with Obama after the state of the union address. She has plans.

She would have been 10 times more competent and hardworking in these last 3 years than Obama. But the Chicago Machine is tougher than the Clinton Machine...kinda scarey, I think.

I wouldn't be surprised if it is already planned. If Dems think Obama might tank, they will replace him with Hillary at the very last minute. That will throw any swing voter into a tailspin and any amount of rational thinking in the voting booth will be severely diminished.

As I have said in the past, if she has any ambitions of 2016 she probably does not want the liability of being Obama's VP is he has as bad a second term as the first.

She may also not want to be viewed as validating Obama's current 4 year stint.

btk

she is a far better candidate than anything the republicans can present.

I would love to see her run in '16 but I think she is being honest in saying that she is through and, in this political climate, how could anyone blame her or anyone else for getting out.

Tough gal took on a tough job!.....Like she said, She is going to take some time off to find out how tired she really is!

Originally Posted by jebartle

Tough gal took on a tough job!.....Like she said, She is going to take some time off to find out how tired she really is!

I still believe she will be President Obamas VP which will then be the grooming process for President in 2016.

Originally Posted by Topper1

I still believe she will be President Obamas VP which will then be the grooming process for President in 2016.

The Arrangement would be more for purposes of making Obama look more competent, just as that was the purpose of making her Secretary of State.

It's all about using people.

I attended a class at the Lifelong Learning College today and the video shown contained statements by several of our most recent Secretaries of State. Wow! Think of the Secretaries of State we've had in our lifetimes...Kissinger, Schulz, Baker, Albright, Powell, Rice, Clinton.

How the heck can we have pretty much of an all-star team of people heading the State Department, while we had to put up with the list of dolts we've had as POTUS? I don't know who the Secretary of State might be for the next four years, but he or she will almost certainly be more prominent, reliable, and will speak consistently for the good of the American people than any of those who might be their boss after January, 2013.

Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna

I attended a class at the Lifelong Learning College today and the video shown contained statements by several of our most recent Secretaries of State. Wow! Think of the Secretaries of State we've had in our lifetimes...Kissinger, Schulz, Baker, Albright, Powell, Rice, Clinton.

How the heck can we have pretty much of an all-star team of people heading the State Department, while we had to put up with the list of dolts we've had as POTUS? I don't know who the Secretary of State might be for the next four years, but he or she will almost certainly be more prominent, reliable, and will speak consistently for the good of the American people than any of those who might be their boss after January, 2013.

I wouldn't put Albright on your A-List. North Korea nukes ring a bell?

She whined that Kim Jong (mentally) Il lied to her.

Overall we have had a bunch of good ones though.