In a new insult to the taxpayer, the Obama Administration has announced the appointment of a "public advocate" for illegal immigrants to address "their concerns" with law enforcement policies. We taxpaying citizens are now supporting an agency (how about this one DJ?) that will be the mouthpiece for illegal immigrants being deported.

Rep. Lamar Smith, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said that meant elevating the concerns of illegal immigrants.

"It's outrageous that the Obama administration has appointed a taxpayer-funded activist for illegal and criminal immigrants who are detained or ordered deported. The administration all too often acts more like a lobbying firm for illegal immigrants than as an advocate for the American people", said Rep. Smith.

Increasing the Democrat voter base?

Administration names official advocate for illegal immigrants - Washington Times

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Increasing the Democrat voter base?

Well that is what the DNC's aledged support of people of Hispanic origin is all about, isn't it?

This is not surprising at all !!! The President has shown his ongoing support for the "dream act" and away we go. Can you imagine 4 more years of this administration without fear of having to get votes !!1

Originally Posted by Bucco

This is not surprising at all !!! The President has shown his ongoing support for the "dream act" and away we go. Can you imagine 4 more years of this administration without fear of having to get votes !!1

Four more years???

Run for your lives!

Webster's defines "illegal" as "forbidden by law or statute and/or forbidden by official rules and regulations". When the hell is anyone ever going to understand this??? Oh--votes (I almost forgot)!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by RichieLion

In a new insult to the taxpayer, the Obama Administration has announced the appointment of a "public advocate" for illegal immigrants to address "their concerns" with law enforcement policies. We taxpaying citizens are now supporting an agency (how about this one DJ?) that will be the mouthpiece for illegal immigrants being deported.

Rep. Lamar Smith, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said that meant elevating the concerns of illegal immigrants.

"It's outrageous that the Obama administration has appointed a taxpayer-funded activist for illegal and criminal immigrants who are detained or ordered deported. The administration all too often acts more like a lobbying firm for illegal immigrants than as an advocate for the American people", said Rep. Smith.

Increasing the Democrat voter base?

Administration names official advocate for illegal immigrants - Washington Times

To the uninitiated among you. Following is a brief snippet about the Washington Times:

In a 2008 essay published in Harper's Magazine, historian Thomas Frank linked the Times to the modern American conservative movement, saying:

There is even a daily newspaper—the Washington Times—published strictly for the movement’s benefit, a propaganda sheet whose distortions are so obvious and so alien that it puts one in mind of those official party organs one encounters when traveling in authoritarian countries.[57]

Originally Posted by MrMark

To the uninitiated among you. Following is a brief snippet about the Washington Times:

In a 2008 essay published in Harper's Magazine, historian Thomas Frank linked the Times to the modern American conservative movement, saying:

There is even a daily newspaper—the Washington Times—published strictly for the movement’s benefit, a propaganda sheet whose distortions are so obvious and so alien that it puts one in mind of those official party organs one encounters when traveling in authoritarian countries.[57]

Really???????; this is your input to this story? A column by a liberal columnist slamming a conservative oriented newspaper is supposed to somehow negate the substance of the story?

Originally Posted by MrMark

To the uninitiated among you. Following is a brief snippet about the Washington Times:

In a 2008 essay published in Harper's Magazine, historian Thomas Frank linked the Times to the modern American conservative movement, saying:

There is even a daily newspaper—the Washington Times—published strictly for the movement’s benefit, a propaganda sheet whose distortions are so obvious and so alien that it puts one in mind of those official party organs one encounters when traveling in authoritarian countries.[57]

From Newsday...
[B]
"DHS adding public advocate for immigration agency"

DHS adding public advocate for immigration agency

From AP


"DHS adding public advocate for immigration agency"

Google

From NPR

"he Homeland Security Department has appointed a public advocate to handle complaints and questions about its immigration enforcement policies."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...Id=146503575\\

It appears you did not like the source so I thought I would give you a few more.

What is it with you people who believe that some of this stuff is made up...you will question the source without even reading to see if it is factual !!!!


The more I think about it....MR MARK should be embarassed and should apologize for the inference and for being so " uninitiated" that he did not even share with the forum that Mr Frank, whom he quotes, is an ex Rep who is known for his criticism of the Republican party. How the elitist just throw things around with no conscience whatsoever amazes me

Originally Posted by Bucco

This is not surprising at all !!! The President has shown his ongoing support for the "dream act" and away we go. Can you imagine 4 more years of this administration without fear of having to get votes !!1

I sure can and I am looking forward to those 4 years.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Really???????; this is your input to this story? A column by a liberal columnist slamming a conservative oriented newspaper is supposed to somehow negate the substance of the story?

Are we referring to the same Thomas Frank? The one who started his political journey as a College Republican before he became highly critical of Republican governance, especially the presidency of George W. Bush. Just what is it that makes this "substantive reporting"?

Originally Posted by MrMark

Are we referring to the same Thomas Frank? The one who started his political journey as a College Republican before he became highly critical of Republican governance, especially the presidency of George W. Bush. Just what is it that makes this "substantive reporting"?

Maybe because the story is true, if that matters to you or not.

Read Bucco's post and the other links reporting the story. I don't understand your take on this story and your reaction to the thread at all. What's your agenda in trying to deflect?

Originally Posted by DaleMN

I sure can and I am looking forward to those 4 years.

Four more years. The republicans can't even come up with a candidate they like.

Originally Posted by janmcn

Four more years. The republicans can't even come up with a candidate they like.

janmcn An old saw comes to mind...."watch what you wish for you may just get it". meaning Obama may get four more years but America will not be able to survive four more years of Obama. We all better learn to speak Chinese.

[QUOTE=Guest;450157]Four more years. The republicans can't even come up with a candidate they like.[/QUOTE


And this has WHAT to do with the thread here ?

Do you bow to some kind of party flag at night....if someone you disliked a lot was a Republican, would you then hug them and welcome them ?

If someone you really like became a Republican would you then throw them aside ?

I say YES based on what I read here.

I hope you realize, but then again that would take thought, that there are many folks on here who you believe to be Republicans and they are actually Democrats and vice versa. Your posts are representative of what is wrong with our country...you just flat don't care what happens to this country as long as your choice is elected. And the very sad fact is that you are probably proud of that.

You would be shocked, for instance, if you knew my political background and registration.


And if you are able, tell us what you think of the way immigration is being handled by this administration.....the absolute approval of the violation of the law, etc.

Originally Posted by rubicon

janmcn An old saw comes to mind...."watch what you wish for you may just get it". meaning Obama may get four more years but America will not be able to survive four more years of Obama. We all better learn to speak Chinese.

如果奧巴馬獲勝，我要吐！我到老學到老中國。