Looks like Cowboy Joe Arpaio might be in some serious trouble. As they say, a new sheriff is in town. Maybe Cowboy Joe will be forced to wear some of the pink underwear in his own jail.

Well, that is what happens when the "law" violates the civil rights of people. Maybe Cowboy Joe never read the Constitution.

Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town - Yahoo! News

Maybe you don't understand the power that a sheriff has in his own terrority. Might just be that some of those boys from DOJ might be wearing pink undies for a while.

The Obama Team continues with their hit list. Intentionally slandering individuals that do not support Obama or contribute to Mitt campaign. These are nothing short of the tactics common street thugs use.

Originally Posted by rubicon

The Obama Team continues with their hit list. Intentionally slandering individuals that do not support Obama or contribute to Mitt campaign. These are nothing short of the tactics common street thugs use.

Not nice referring to the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee as a thug. Even if you are correct.

Daily Kos: Mitt-the-Bully Took His High School Thug Training to Bain

Originally Posted by coralway

Not nice referring to the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee as a thug. Even if you are correct.

Daily Kos: Mitt-the-Bully Took His High School Thug Training to Bain

You might want to reread my post

This story about Arizona speaks to the utter hypocrisy of this Holder and this administration.

Holder does not enforce any law of this country, which is his job, if he does not like it and then a rep of his mentions the constitution.

Stand your ground Sheriff Joe....the Arizona law simply says we will enforce the federal law you will not...will not arrest but turn the lawbreakers you dont care about over to you.

Holder and his secrets on Mexico......and other things will come out...could this be part of an October surprise ?

Originally Posted by coralway

Not nice referring to the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee as a thug. Even if you are correct.

Daily Kos: Mitt-the-Bully Took His High School Thug Training to Bain

Let me understand this.....it is more important to you that we punish a high school student, who did nothing but capers and as the story continues the folks are backing out...but THIS is important to you...

BUT NOT IMPORTANT to you is the President of the United States singling out individuals, calling them criminals and sending folks to their districts to dig up dirt....because they gave money to his opponent.

I dont know....my perception of all of this leads me to a different conclusion.

"These are nothing short of the tactics common street thugs use."

Very interesting comment but I did not know "common street thugs" use the guaranteed rights of the 4th Amendment as one of their tactics.

I seriously doubt the validity of the post that says, "BUT NOT IMPORTANT to you is the President of the United States singling out individuals, calling them criminals and sending folks to their districts to dig up dirt....because they gave money to his opponent." I would like to see hard evidence of that - and not just a link to some right-wing rag or a windbag like Beck or Limbaugh - but actual proof of that remark.

Originally Posted by buggyone

Looks like Cowboy Joe Arpaio might be in some serious trouble. As they say, a new sheriff is in town. Maybe Cowboy Joe will be forced to wear some of the pink underwear in his own jail.

Well, that is what happens when the "law" violates the civil rights of people. Maybe Cowboy Joe never read the Constitution.

Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town - Yahoo! News

Our Sheriff was indicted by DOJ back a few years ago. He plead out a deal and did a small amount of time in a Federal Detention Center. It happens.

Originally Posted by buggyone

"These are nothing short of the tactics common street thugs use."

Very interesting comment but I did not know "common street thugs" use the guaranteed rights of the 4th Amendment as one of their tactics.

Let me help you here.....the quote you are using to make whatever point you want to make had to do with the Obama administration calling out donors to Romney for public ridicule and accusation and then following up by having operatives in their areas digging up as much dirt as possible.

The quote you use has NOTHING to do with the 4th ammendment and had you read the post correctly you would have known that.

Originally Posted by Bucco

Let me help you here.....the quote you are using to make whatever point you want to make had to do with the Obama administration calling out donors to Romney for public ridicule and accusation and then following up by having operatives in their areas digging up as much dirt as possible.

The quote you use has NOTHING to do with the 4th ammendment and had you read the post correctly you would have known that.

I read it quite clearly. I do not think you understood my underlying message that Cowboy Joe was denying citizens their 4th Amendment rights as guaranteed by the Constitution and that was the reason DOJ had to be sent to Arizona.

Originally Posted by buggyone

I read it quite clearly. I do not think you understood my underlying message that Cowboy Joe was denying citizens their 4th Amendment rights as guaranteed by the Constitution and that was the reason DOJ had to be sent to Arizona.

Citizens or illegal aliens? Yes I use the term illegal aliens not undocumented persons.

Originally Posted by buggyone

I read it quite clearly. I do not think you understood my underlying message that Cowboy Joe was denying citizens their 4th Amendment rights as guaranteed by the Constitution and that was the reason DOJ had to be sent to Arizona.

OK....slowly now....this is the quote you are using, originally used by RUBICON in post #3

"The Obama Team continues with their hit list. Intentionally slandering individuals that do not support Obama or contribute to Mitt campaign. These are nothing short of the tactics common street thugs use."

I have a very bad habit of reading the entire post and in that quote he alludes to the Obama guys and the Romney donors. He may have put it in the wrong thread...dont know, but he even mentions the contributions.

Pretty clear and now you use it for a different reason......just ask that you read before you react.

Again..the quote that you are using does not refer to the reason you are using it.

Originally Posted by Bucco

OK....slowly now....this is the quote you are using, originally used by RUBICON in post #3

"The Obama Team continues with their hit list. Intentionally slandering individuals that do not support Obama or contribute to Mitt campaign. These are nothing short of the tactics common street thugs use."

I have a very bad habit of reading the entire post and in that quote he alludes to the Obama guys and the Romney donors. He may have put it in the wrong thread...dont know, but he even mentions the contributions.

Pretty clear and now you use it for a different reason......just ask that you read before you react.

Again..the quote that you are using does not refer to the reason you are using it.

What is exactly libelous in the articles put on by the Obama campaign machine? Is this not information that can be obtained on reputable sites like the New York Times, Seattle Post Intelligencer, The Oregonian The Oregonian | Oregon Online Newspaper - OregonLive.com, etc. Seattle news, sports, events, entertainment | seattlepi.com - seattlepi.com

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

What is exactly libel in the articles put on by the Obama campain machine? Is this not information that can be obtained on reputable sites like the New York Times, Seattle Post, The Oregonian The Oregonian | Oregon Online Newspaper - OregonLive.com, etc.

There have been at least TWO threads on this subject....I hope the Wall St Journal fits into your "reputable" site list !!!

Here is the latest but not the first.

And to your comment about reputable sites....please let me know when I use one that does not suit you. I pretty much double check most of the links I post and I suppose having you be my editor would be fine...you just let me know when I am not acceptable.

You folks are just amazing...Obama cannot be wrong...if someone says it, they are looking for money, the site is a whacko or something of that ilk. the man is like walking perfection. I suppose as you folks I should just bow down in awe and take whatever he says as gospel.....despite the lies.

I know, lets listen to some old high school chums from almost 50 years ago about a caper........NOW THAT is straight on.....and it has to be correct.

TWO threads on this AT LEAST on this forum