50 neighbors

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #91  
Old 09-14-2019, 09:14 PM
FLSunshine FLSunshine is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 18
Thanks: 1
Thanked 39 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I agree with Gracie. If everyone was following the rules then there should be no issue. If people are not following the rules they agreed to when they bought the property then it's time time to look in the mirror and stop blaming other people for your own issues. Don't agree to the rules and then get mad at someone else because you aren't doing what you're supposed to do. To look for, make comments about, and try to attack the other person is extremely childish/toddler behavior.
  #92  
Old 09-14-2019, 09:17 PM
coffeebean's Avatar
coffeebean coffeebean is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Village of Mallory Square
Posts: 7,683
Thanks: 462
Thanked 4,167 Times in 1,928 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 View Post

Good that Community Standards was just calling the people to see if there were actually any problems with the law ornaments. That saves a lot of gas and time.
I assume you mean "lawn" ornaments. To my understanding, lawn ornaments under the eaves of homes are allowed to be displayed. Lawn ornaments in any other location on the property is not allowed.

A phone call? How does that count as Community Standards checking out complaints?
__________________

Last edited by coffeebean; 09-14-2019 at 09:38 PM.
  #93  
Old 09-14-2019, 10:19 PM
charmed59 charmed59 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 667
Thanks: 67
Thanked 392 Times in 154 Posts
Default

I think the original intent was neighbors who had to look at others yards everyday could turn them in anonymously. It’s morphed to any one in the Villages could turn in anyone anywhere else in the Villages even if it is 10 miles away on a cul-de-sac they visited once on the day they wandered with their clipboard.

When I moved my final furnishings from up north to here the movers set a yard ornament in my front yard among some boulders. About a month later I noticed it and went to pull it out to put it in the back yard. I was stopped by my neighbors who liked looking at it every morning when they got their paper. So I left it there. Six months later I got a call from community watch saying I needed to move it, as it was handed in on a complaint along with many others in the neighborhood. Now the ornament sits in my backyard, where I can see it from the pool. Didn’t cost me a thing, but my neighbors were very disappointed.

If the complaints were limited to those in the same Village I would find the rules would make much more sense.
  #94  
Old 09-15-2019, 12:15 AM
Spikearoni Spikearoni is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New Hampshire, now Heathrow on Lake Deaton Preserve.
Posts: 219
Thanks: 2
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Maybe someone could follow her home to find out where she lives, and as someone previously suggested, plant her a yard full of crosses, pink flamingos, whatever. Then everyone in the whole group could individually file reports on her.[/QUOTE]

Now that's really funny. Thanks for the laughs.
  #95  
Old 09-15-2019, 03:34 AM
Biker Dog's Avatar
Biker Dog Biker Dog is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Reading, Pa, The Villages, Reading, Pa, The Villages until the end.
Posts: 834
Thanks: 2
Thanked 53 Times in 30 Posts
Default

If the complaints were limited to those in the same Village I would find the rules would make much more sense.[/QUOTE]

  #96  
Old 09-15-2019, 04:08 AM
roob1 roob1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 289
Thanks: 40
Thanked 149 Times in 69 Posts
Default

Why focus on the reporter's motivation? Again, blame-shifting!!

If 50 reports result in 10 violations being corrected, how is that NOT a public service?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chellybean View Post
I completely disagree with you Gracie this is a spiteful mean action and is not a public service, just one persons vendetta against everyone for a personal reason!
  #97  
Old 09-15-2019, 07:27 AM
OrangeBlossomBaby OrangeBlossomBaby is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,534
Thanks: 6,873
Thanked 9,513 Times in 3,106 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roob1 View Post
Why focus on the reporter's motivation? Again, blame-shifting!!

If 50 reports result in 10 violations being corrected, how is that NOT a public service?
Will you feel the same when someone reports you twice a week for violations against your property, and CS has to check on you twice a week, for several months in a row to confirm that the violations are false?
  #98  
Old 09-15-2019, 07:37 AM
retiredguy123 retiredguy123 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 14,253
Thanks: 2,344
Thanked 13,717 Times in 5,245 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazuela View Post
Will you feel the same when someone reports you twice a week for violations against your property, and CS has to check on you twice a week, for several months in a row to confirm that the violations are false?
Actually, I think I would. I even enjoy talking to telemarketers. I don't have any violations, but, if I did, I would want to get them fixed, and would welcome CS's help to identify them.
  #99  
Old 09-15-2019, 07:43 AM
600th Photo Sq 600th Photo Sq is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 859
Thanks: 1
Thanked 426 Times in 140 Posts
Default

It really is simple. We understood that The Villages is a " Deed Restricted Community " we read through the rules and felt they were reasonable and super easy to follow.

So with that, we bought our home. We have made improvements went through the process of getting them approved. We simply follow the rules.

Break the rules then face the consequences, like anything else, break the law, etc. etc it's life.
  #100  
Old 09-15-2019, 07:43 AM
OrangeBlossomBaby OrangeBlossomBaby is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,534
Thanks: 6,873
Thanked 9,513 Times in 3,106 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredguy123 View Post
Actually, I think I would. I even enjoy talking to telemarketers. I don't have any violations, but, if I did, I would want to get them fixed, and would welcome CS's help to identify them.
In my neck of the woods, that behavior is called stalking and harassment and a judge can sign off on a cease and desist for it. There was a family in a nearby town who encountered the same kind of thing. Someone in the household was wheelchair bound, and they had a handicap-equipped van in the driveway and were building a wheelchair ramp from the front step to the driveway. A neighbor thought it was unsightly, and started complaining on a weekly basis to the zoning department about the ramp.

'They're extending it two inches too close to the sidewalk' or "the material is 1/8" too thin" or "they're digging within 10 feet of the curb"...

None of what they were saying was true, and all the work has the proper licensing and permits issued.

The neighbor was issued a cease and desist, and did it again anyway, and was arrested for violating the cease and desist order.

That is the kind of thing I'm talking about, that can happen, and possibly already IS happening to some extent, in the Villages.
  #101  
Old 09-15-2019, 07:48 AM
queasy27 queasy27 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 868
Thanks: 457
Thanked 332 Times in 144 Posts
Default

As has been speculated, my guess is that the person doing the reporting is someone who was turned in for his/her own violation(s), got angry about the unfairness of being singled out when others were getting away with the same thing, and decided to right those wrongs.

Honestly, I can understand that impulse better than I can homeowners who are mad at and urging a vendetta against someone who's following the reporting rules.
  #102  
Old 09-15-2019, 07:59 AM
BobnBev's Avatar
BobnBev BobnBev is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sanibel
Posts: 2,233
Thanks: 1
Thanked 359 Times in 153 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet View Post
One lived in the historic area and the other lived in district 1. I think they weren’t big into displays anyways.

I was interested in this thread because the person I bought from had dementia and left 2 small items in the front for bed; a weathervane among the bushes so small you can’t see, and a planter, then one more empty planter at the back. I thought they’d take them before closing but they just left them and I closed remotely. And someone stole a bush from the front, and a brick, they could have taken the planters....
I thought planters were exempt.
__________________
Patriot Guard Riders--"Standing for Those Who Have Stood for US"!

Laughter is the best medicine, unless you're being treated for Shingles
  #103  
Old 09-15-2019, 10:15 AM
dillywho dillywho is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Summerhill
Posts: 1,765
Thanks: 133
Thanked 78 Times in 27 Posts
Default Deed Restrictions

I would suggest that everyone read the restrictions for each District before a blanket accusation regarding violations is discussed. I just reread mine and many of the others. Not all have the same restrictions. Mine in District 3 differ in some areas from those in District 8, just as an example. What is a violation in one area (District) is NOT a violation in another.
__________________
Lubbock, TX
Bamberg, Germany
Lawton, OK
Amarillo, TX
The Villages, FL

To quote my dad:
"I never did see a board that didn't have two sides."
  #104  
Old 09-15-2019, 03:21 PM
Marathon Man Marathon Man is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,467
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2,663 Times in 941 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charmed59 View Post
I think the original intent was neighbors who had to look at others yards everyday could turn them in anonymously. It’s morphed to any one in the Villages could turn in anyone anywhere else in the Villages even if it is 10 miles away on a cul-de-sac they visited once on the day they wandered with their clipboard.

When I moved my final furnishings from up north to here the movers set a yard ornament in my front yard among some boulders. About a month later I noticed it and went to pull it out to put it in the back yard. I was stopped by my neighbors who liked looking at it every morning when they got their paper. So I left it there. Six months later I got a call from community watch saying I needed to move it, as it was handed in on a complaint along with many others in the neighborhood. Now the ornament sits in my backyard, where I can see it from the pool. Didn’t cost me a thing, but my neighbors were very disappointed.

If the complaints were limited to those in the same Village I would find the rules would make much more sense.
Aw yes. I think. I was told. I heard.

Original intent is not known by any of us. What is known is that anyone can report a violation anywhere.
  #105  
Old 09-15-2019, 03:26 PM
Marathon Man Marathon Man is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,467
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2,663 Times in 941 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coffeebean View Post
I assume you mean "lawn" ornaments. To my understanding, lawn ornaments under the eaves of homes are allowed to be displayed. Lawn ornaments in any other location on the property is not allowed.

A phone call? How does that count as Community Standards checking out complaints?
About a month ago I asked that very question, and was told by Community Standards that the lawn 'under the eves' is controlled by deed restrictions. On your porch is not controlled. So you have to change your lawn ornaments to porch ornaments to come into compliance.
Closed Thread

Tags
mental, issue, vendetta, personal, tracks


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 PM.