![]() |
Quote:
Isn't that always the answer? :popcorn: |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
If you look at the bottom of the water tower you can see the shoddy work done. Either they botched it during construction or a cheap fix was done. The windmill itself appears to be functioning properly so all you need is a new tower. Doesn't the District have maintenance people on their payroll or do they contract out everything?
Aermotor Windmill Company - Wind-Powered Water Pumps |
What is the "significance" of a water tower (that does not function?) Take it down - you won't miss it in a couple months. $225K is still a lot of money.
|
The tower and the windmill look "nice", but in the whole scheme of things, it's a waste of time, money and materials.
If the PWAC "owns" the tower, then they shouldn't be asked by a different entity to replace it, or pay for the replacement. I think that someone is taking advantage, thinks of it as an opportunity, and wants some "easy money". |
Quote:
|
I like the windmill and water tower. But I think someone needs to question this expenditure.
I remember when they were built. Are we going to be on the hook for a quarter of a million every 5 or 6 years? Those timbers should last longer. Also, if they need to be replaced, take bids. Don't just take someone's word for it that they cost that much.I built a 7000 ft timber frame house of timbers like those used in the water tower for about $750,000. So, when someone tells me the demolition and reconstruction of that windmill will cost $250,000, I am going to take some convincing. |
Quote:
|
My $0.02 since I'm going to be a Villager in a couple months so I need to get some complaining practice in:
One would expect structures like this to use pressure treated lumber and/or be made of materials that would last more than ten years. If The Developer built this as part of the decorations for the square, and then turned the maintenance over to the CDD (or whoever), I think the CDD would have a legitimate gripe that The Developer did not build them properly, in accordance with industry best practices, i.e. did a lousy job and should have known better. The dollar amount is probably not high enough to get too many lawyers involved, but it seems fair that the original builder (The Developer) should bear the burden of replacing it. On the other hand, if there was some sort of maintenance that was required/expected to keep the structures healthy, and the CDD didn't perform that, then the fault is theirs. Now, do _I_ want _my_ tax dollars going to replace something that is purely decorative? Not really. I'd rather see the money go into something functional - someone mentioned shading. |
Quote:
|
Don’t worry be happy
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We've been told windmills kill thousands of birds and cause cancer. Time for it to go.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.