Are the districts being conned again?

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 04-01-2024, 08:11 AM
kkingston57 kkingston57 is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 2,072
Thanks: 62
Thanked 908 Times in 526 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoMar View Post
Not only about rentals, internal also goes to having kids live with you, kids staing more than 30 days a year, noise complaints. Also, not sure the state bill has any teeth in it or how they will enforce.
Will need to create new agency and call it "Village Enforcement" and they will need to enforce all of the BNB Operations, golf cart speeders, independently investigate Morse Blvd cart vs car accidents, enforce crosses and other similar things, monitor all round abouts, etc and all at a cost which will not increase amenity fees by no more than $5.00 a household.
  #47  
Old 04-01-2024, 08:22 AM
Shipping up to Boston Shipping up to Boston is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: South Harmon Institute of Technology
Posts: 1,972
Thanks: 2
Thanked 925 Times in 561 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kkingston57 View Post
Will need to create new agency and call it "Village Enforcement" and they will need to enforce all of the BNB Operations, golf cart speeders, independently investigate Morse Blvd cart vs car accidents, enforce crosses and other similar things, monitor all round abouts, etc and all at a cost which will not increase amenity fees by no more than $5.00 a household.
Oh Boy. Smh
  #48  
Old 04-01-2024, 02:47 PM
JMintzer JMintzer is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Where Eagles Dare to Soar...
Posts: 11,825
Thanks: 484
Thanked 8,908 Times in 4,669 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shipping up to Boston View Post
Oh Boy. Smh
The Villages Florida
  #49  
Old 04-01-2024, 03:27 PM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,586
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,200 Times in 685 Posts
Default

There isn't any arbitrary increasing of the amenity fee. The amenity fee changes according to the CPI, as per your deed restrictions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kkingston57 View Post
Will need to create new agency and call it "Village Enforcement" and they will need to enforce all of the BNB Operations, golf cart speeders, independently investigate Morse Blvd cart vs car accidents, enforce crosses and other similar things, monitor all round abouts, etc and all at a cost which will not increase amenity fees by no more than $5.00 a household.
  #50  
Old 04-01-2024, 04:10 PM
Stu from NYC Stu from NYC is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 15,055
Thanks: 1,251
Thanked 16,049 Times in 6,272 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biker1 View Post
There isn't any arbitrary increasing of the amenity fee. The amenity fee changes according to the CPI, as per your deed restrictions.
Not if they add more functions that add to expenses
  #51  
Old 04-01-2024, 04:12 PM
Shipping up to Boston Shipping up to Boston is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: South Harmon Institute of Technology
Posts: 1,972
Thanks: 2
Thanked 925 Times in 561 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMintzer View Post
The Villages Florida
Youve been on a lot longer than me....you never know whos kidding and who isn't
  #52  
Old 04-01-2024, 04:13 PM
JMintzer JMintzer is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Where Eagles Dare to Soar...
Posts: 11,825
Thanks: 484
Thanked 8,908 Times in 4,669 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shipping up to Boston View Post
Youve been on a lot longer than me....you never know whos kidding and who isn't
Well, "Sarcasm" -is- my 2nd language, so...
  #53  
Old 04-01-2024, 04:56 PM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,586
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,200 Times in 685 Posts
Default

Doubtful. You have some language that supports that assertion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu from NYC View Post
Not if they add more functions that add to expenses
  #54  
Old 04-01-2024, 05:19 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 6,811
Thanks: 2,087
Thanked 7,258 Times in 2,831 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biker1 View Post
There isn't any arbitrary increasing of the amenity fee. The amenity fee changes according to the CPI, as per your deed restrictions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu from NYC View Post
Not if they add more functions that add to expenses
Quote:
Originally Posted by biker1 View Post
Doubtful. You have some language that supports that assertion?
I have this language in my deed restrictions:
4.1(c) Each Owner agrees that as additional facilities are requested by the Owner, and the erection of such additional facilities is agreed to by the Developer, that upon a vote of 1/2 of the Owners approving such additional facilities and commensurate charges therefore, the monthly Contractual Amenities Fee provided for herein shall be increased accordingly. For the purpose of all votes, the Developer shall be entitled to one (1) vote for each Homesite owned by the Developer.
Additional facilities -> additional costs -> increased amenities fee. Of note, the addition of these facilities must be approved by 1/2 of the owners so not exactly arbitrary.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #55  
Old 04-01-2024, 05:55 PM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,586
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,200 Times in 685 Posts
Default

Yes, my deed restrictions say that. It isn't clear to me that a facility is the same as a service since they use the term "erection", such as building something. What is being discussed is a service and not a facility. Regardless, the CDDs cannot arbitrarily increase the amenity fee unless additional facilities are requested by the owners and agreed to by 1/2 the owners. I have lived here for 10 years and have never seen that happen. Good luck with that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
I have this language in my deed restrictions:
4.1(c) Each Owner agrees that as additional facilities are requested by the Owner, and the erection of such additional facilities is agreed to by the Developer, that upon a vote of 1/2 of the Owners approving such additional facilities and commensurate charges therefore, the monthly Contractual Amenities Fee provided for herein shall be increased accordingly. For the purpose of all votes, the Developer shall be entitled to one (1) vote for each Homesite owned by the Developer.
Additional facilities -> additional costs -> increased amenities fee. Of note, the addition of these facilities must be approved by 1/2 of the owners so not exactly arbitrary.
  #56  
Old 04-01-2024, 06:16 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 6,811
Thanks: 2,087
Thanked 7,258 Times in 2,831 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biker1 View Post
Yes, my deed restrictions say that. It isn't clear to me that a facility is the same as a service since they use the term "erection", such as building something. What is being discussed is a service and not a facility. Regardless, the CDDs cannot arbitrarily increase the amenity fee unless additional facilities are requested by the owners and agreed to by 1/2 the owners. I have lived here for 10 years and have never seen that happen. Good luck with that.
This thread and any additional costs have no connection to amenities fees. The numbered CDDs have nothing to do with amenities fees - they don't levy amenities fees, they don't receive amenities fees, and they don't spend amenities fees.

This thread has to do with the possibility of numbered CDDs taking on additional duties.The activities of the numbered CDDs are funded through the annual maintenance fee.

Amenities fees can be increased beyond the CPI adjustment as detailed in the deed restrictions. However, since the topic of this thread has nothing to do with additional amenities, the topic of this thread cannot result in an increase in amenities fees.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #57  
Old 04-01-2024, 06:21 PM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,586
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,200 Times in 685 Posts
Default

I never said the numbered CDDs. I was also responding to the post suggesting that the amenity fee could be increased by $5 for an additional service. It can't. Reread my post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
This thread and any additional costs have no connection to amenities fees. The numbered CDDs have nothing to do with amenities fees - they don't levy amenities fees, they don't receive amenities fees, and they don't spend amenities fees.

This thread has to do with the possibility of numbered CDDs taking on additional duties.The activities of the numbered CDDs are funded through the annual maintenance fee.

Amenities fees can be increased beyond the CPI adjustment as detailed in the deed restrictions. However, since the topic of this thread has nothing to do with additional amenities, the topic of this thread cannot result in an increase in amenities fees.
  #58  
Old 04-01-2024, 06:57 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 6,811
Thanks: 2,087
Thanked 7,258 Times in 2,831 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biker1 View Post
I never said the numbered CDDs. I was also responding to the post suggesting that the amenity fee could be increased by $5 for an additional service. It can't. Reread my post.
Just trying to tie things together for anyone who has become lost in all the extraneous information.

I read and understood your post. I even agreed with it to a point. What I didn't understand was the post you responded to, it seemed like an April Fool's joke.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
Closed Thread

Tags
districts, rentals, costs, developer, imagine


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 AM.