![]() |
If the path remains open, those living outside The Villages (Stonecrest, Spruce Creek South, Water Oaks, and others, still won't have the same full lifestyle as Villagers. By that I mean, access to recreation centers, executive golf, hundreds of clubs, traveling in your golf cart to Squares, supermarkets, restaurants, etc. etc. However, if the path is closed, some Villagers will be impacted from using the path to get to their desired locations via golf cart outside the Villages. Of Course, they can use their car or if they don't have one they can travel with a friend or call a taxi. Obviously, residents of The Villages can still use the 27/441 golf cart bridge to travel anywhere within The Villages.
When you think about this situation logically, isn't that what we bought into when we purchased a home in The Villages. We have no legal right to drive our golf carts outside of the boundaries of The Villages unless it's legal to do so. The gate (instead of a wall) on paradise lane was put up to allow Villagers to travel in their golf cart where they had been allowed to travel (for many years) but this required traveling outside the boundaries of The Villages and on private property. In summary, we as Villagers have no right to travel outside of The Villages in a golf cart unless it's legal to do so and those living outside The Villages have no right to travel inside The Villages in a golf cart unless it's legal to do so. It's should be noted that a Street Legal Cart might get you to a lot of places that a regular cart will not allow you to legally travel. However, monitoring these activities, will at best, be a challenge. I wonder if it is even worth the time and effort to do so? Fore! |
The post 161 removes the emotion and sums the thread up, quite well. Thanks
|
Strictly speaking, the golf cart paths (aka the Multi Modal Paths) are owned by the CDDs (although it is possible that not all of the paths have as yet been turned over to the CDDs by the Developer). When you use the term "The Villages", I assume you mean the Developer.
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nicely said! Thanks Rubicon |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Interesting how many people want to put their two cents in on this discussion, when they have no vested interest or need to use this path. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:1rotfl: :1rotfl: :1rotfl: :clap2: |
Quote:
Wow Rubicon! That's sounds pretty absurd. The Stonecrest and Del Webb communities have their own Rec Centers, Swimming Pools, golf courses, clubs, fitness centers that are equally as nice. What ever makes you think that anyone else outside your Red Zone wants to use your facilities? That is paranoid thinking. The Villages public facilities are available to everyone. That is great for insiders and outsiders. Retail businesses need all the help they can get. This topic is about the use of the Duke Cart path for Villagers, Stonecrest, and Spruce Creek. The Villages Lifestyle is not the topic here. |
I heard Cosco and Trader Joe's are building just north of Stonecrest :coolsmiley::gc:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
While I am one of those that don't use that path/trail and have no vested interest, as a decent and caring human being I would like to see those who do need it...be able to keep using it. Some of the comments here that in essence are saying (paraphrasing).. "we are the true Villagers and would rather see other Villagers lose their use of it, rather than have an 'outsider' use 'our' paths/MMP's"...seems pretty cold-hearted and selfish to me. :( I mean really, other than a few more carts that would be impossible to distinguish from the hordes already here...what difference does it really make? :ohdear: But hey, that's just my opinion and observation. :shrug: Here's hoping that a viable solution is put in place and those who now use it...will be able to continue to do so. :thumbup: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What I see as the concern is when the non Villages visitors drive their carts on the Villages owned facilities i.e. the multi-modal paths. Adding congestion to already crowed and dangerous paths. |
Quote:
Quote:
But wait, is that a white knight I see riding up? |
Quote:
|
Great Restraint
Quote:
Quote:
I agree with Steve9930 that it was a great mistake to continue to bring this issue up, and particularly to continue to bring it up to Duke Energy. The rational thing would have been for those who use the path to continue to use it until Duke took some affirmative action to close the path. This is simple. If Duke Energy wanted to close the path, it could be accomplished in a couple of hours by bringing some earth moving equipment and plowing great trenches across the property. The rational thing to do would have been to not poke the sleeping giant. This is a case where it was easier to get forgiveness than permission. :gc: |
Quote:
As for use of facilities again my recollection points to many a thread speaking to the issue of non-residents sneaking in to pools, rec centers and executive courses with or without the assist of some village residents. In fact ambassadors had to chase more than one non-resident off the executive courses which they entered by climbing over a fence. Because I'm paranoid doesn't mean non-resident are not sneaking in:D No my red zone analogy is on solid ground Interesting enough for me is that it is not the act that bothers me its the hypocrisy of it all. and like all bad situations if you don't nip it in the bud it will grow out of control. A village without borders is no village at all Personal Best Regards: |
Quote:
But not on the Duke path. ;) |
The big mistake was the group that took it upon themselves to "upgrade" the path without the owners permission. IMO, this was an underhanded attempt to claim access via prescriptive easement or implied dedication. Most likely, one of the users concocted this plan, similar to the attempt to force TV to open access through the historic villages based on medical access necessities, and even trying to get national organizations and US representatives involved. Duke recognized this immediately, and thus, the letter of impending closure.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I believe that before the path was improved Duke was under the impression the traffic was minimal. However after learning about the improvements, I can hear the comment now", "We have a problem. With the increased traffic there is going to be an incident and we will be libel". That's all it takes to wake up the legal staff. Everyone will just have to sit back and see what happens now. I believe that Duke also sees this as a PR Nightmare. You get these when you ignore the obvious. Duke should have closed the path years ago to avoid what they have now.. We will just have to wait and see. Sometimes if you just sit back and be quiet the legal staff goes back to sleep. For me I see some white light in this. I was looking at the Elio. If the path closes I'll have and argument with the CEO of the family to buy one when they become available. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not his point. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:loco: |
Quote:
As you know, the paths aren't being monitored so it's entirely possibly for non-Villagers to use them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I heard that Walmart and Duke had final talks on Friday. I have not heard the outcome.
Rollie |
Quote:
|
I was told by a Target cashier, Target is buying the Duke property and closing the path down.
:popcorn: |
I have a friend, whose cousins brother said that Duke Energy was going to set up booths along the path...and rent them out for use as a flea market.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.