Future of recycling

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-30-2020, 01:21 PM
merrymini merrymini is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 880
Thanks: 428
Thanked 1,204 Times in 465 Posts
Default Future of recycling

A vote will be taken on the new recycling, or rather the non recycling program, on June 18 by NSCUDD. It appears that September will be the last of the recycling and the "burn" will begin in October. All garbage and recyclables, including yard waste, will be burned. I understand the economics and I understand that there is a energy component, but I do not understand why, aluminum, which can be recycled over and over with no degradation and which still has some value in the recycling market is not put aside. I also do not understand why the garbage pick ups cannot be only once a week instead of twice a week, reducing carbon footprint. I do not look forward to inhaling the toxins released from the burn of plastic, etc. assuming that the burn will be in this vicinity. I am very sorry to see this happening. We will also be seeing an increase in charges. I, for one, am crushing my aluminum cans and will be reducing the amount of plastics I purchase. I will also be contacting manufacturers of items I buy to ask them to reduce the packaging they use for new products. I will be eliminating the newspaper (or that is what it is called) since that will also not be recycled. Odd because the cost of the newspaper went up significantly the last time I subscribed to it. There are plenty of things that can be done to reduce garbage and hope people concerned with the environment look into them and do what they can to reduce waste. I sincerely believe this burn to be a mistake.
  #2  
Old 05-30-2020, 02:34 PM
davem4616 davem4616 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,656
Thanks: 539
Thanked 4,152 Times in 1,326 Posts
Default

China hasn't wanted to take our recycled stuff for awhile now....I've been wondering how the stockpile of recyclable 'stuff' is going to be addressed...

when I was in the smelting business we'd buy a lot of recycled aluminum to make ingots and include that in the melt mix....we knew which sources of scrap aluminum to use and how many times the aluminum used that that specific product (e.g. air conditioners) had been previously recycled...our metallurgical engineers (which I was not one of) determined that for our purposes, aluminum could only be recycled 7 times before the properties broke down
  #3  
Old 05-30-2020, 02:38 PM
Jima64 Jima64 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,546
Thanks: 161
Thanked 217 Times in 81 Posts
Default

companies don't really care if you complain about the packaging as long as the masses continue to buy it. other ways to make less impact on the earth.
  #4  
Old 05-30-2020, 02:48 PM
Stu from NYC Stu from NYC is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 12,582
Thanks: 1,165
Thanked 14,050 Times in 5,337 Posts
Default

Lots of stuff is overpackaged with heavy plastics making it incredibly difficult to remove the item from its package.
  #5  
Old 05-30-2020, 03:31 PM
Number 10 GI Number 10 GI is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,637
Thanks: 5,119
Thanked 3,224 Times in 929 Posts
Default

I don't know enough about the recycling industry to have an informed knowledge of it. Maybe if the company was allowed to operate tax free that could make enough of a margin for them to realize a modest profit. There could be other tax incentives that would help, not required to pay gasoline tax for their collection vehicles, no sales tax on vehicles/equipment used in the business. A business has to make a profit.
  #6  
Old 05-30-2020, 03:55 PM
twoplanekid's Avatar
twoplanekid twoplanekid is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: born Urbana,Il lived in Urbana Ohio for 65 years a house in Lake Deaton
Posts: 1,981
Thanks: 6
Thanked 690 Times in 282 Posts
Default

An interesting article about the State of Waste-to- Energy that includes Covanta -> The State of Waste-to-Energy in the U.S. | Waste360

While the figures are only preliminary and may be changed at the June 18th NSCUDD meeting, NSCUDD will save $700,000 by eliminating recycling but taking everything to Covanta will cost $2,288,100 more as per the figures presented here found on page 62.

Coversheet
  #7  
Old 05-31-2020, 06:00 AM
jedalton jedalton is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mt. AIRY NC, NORFOLK VA, VA BEACH, VA, FT WAYNE,IN, CINCINNATI, OH, ROSWELL, GA, THE VILLAGES
Posts: 402
Thanks: 1,488
Thanked 194 Times in 110 Posts
Default cost

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrymini View Post
A vote will be taken on the new recycling, or rather the non recycling program, on June 18 by NSCUDD. It appears that September will be the last of the recycling and the "burn" will begin in October. All garbage and recyclables, including yard waste, will be burned. I understand the economics and I understand that there is a energy component, but I do not understand why, aluminum, which can be recycled over and over with no degradation and which still has some value in the recycling market is not put aside. I also do not understand why the garbage pick ups cannot be only once a week instead of twice a week, reducing carbon footprint. I do not look forward to inhaling the toxins released from the burn of plastic, etc. assuming that the burn will be in this vicinity. I am very sorry to see this happening. We will also be seeing an increase in charges. I, for one, am crushing my aluminum cans and will be reducing the amount of plastics I purchase. I will also be contacting manufacturers of items I buy to ask them to reduce the packaging they use for new products. I will be eliminating the newspaper (or that is what it is called) since that will also not be recycled. Odd because the cost of the newspaper went up significantly the last time I subscribed to it. There are plenty of things that can be done to reduce garbage and hope people concerned with the environment look into them and do what they can to reduce waste. I sincerely believe this burn to be a mistake.
it's always about the cost
  #8  
Old 05-31-2020, 06:06 AM
crash crash is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 701
Thanks: 951
Thanked 493 Times in 240 Posts
Default

They do remove metal before burning and sell it, so it will still be recycled at the end facility.
  #9  
Old 05-31-2020, 06:31 AM
retiredguy123 retiredguy123 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 14,257
Thanks: 2,348
Thanked 13,737 Times in 5,252 Posts
Default

I think the Government should get rid of the junk mail. It is a significant amount of the trash produced and it wastes a lot of energy to produce it and to transport it around the country.

Also, beverages and other products can be packaged in glass, plastic, alumunium, or cardboard. I don't know which is best, but the resulting waste should be a consideration as to which material to use.
  #10  
Old 05-31-2020, 06:56 AM
Guitarman1951 Guitarman1951 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: The Villages
Posts: 213
Thanks: 461
Thanked 283 Times in 118 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrymini View Post
A vote will be taken on the new recycling, or rather the non recycling program, on June 18 by NSCUDD. It appears that September will be the last of the recycling and the "burn" will begin in October. All garbage and recyclables, including yard waste, will be burned. I understand the economics and I understand that there is a energy component, but I do not understand why, aluminum, which can be recycled over and over with no degradation and which still has some value in the recycling market is not put aside. I also do not understand why the garbage pick ups cannot be only once a week instead of twice a week, reducing carbon footprint. I do not look forward to inhaling the toxins released from the burn of plastic, etc. assuming that the burn will be in this vicinity. I am very sorry to see this happening. We will also be seeing an increase in charges. I, for one, am crushing my aluminum cans and will be reducing the amount of plastics I purchase. I will also be contacting manufacturers of items I buy to ask them to reduce the packaging they use for new products. I will be eliminating the newspaper (or that is what it is called) since that will also not be recycled. Odd because the cost of the newspaper went up significantly the last time I subscribed to it. There are plenty of things that can be done to reduce garbage and hope people concerned with the environment look into them and do what they can to reduce waste. I sincerely believe this burn to be a mistake.
We need twice a week pick up because they don't allow us to use trash cans. Even if they did, my garage is not large enough to keep it inside which they wouldn't like either. Twice a week let's us avoid having stinking trash sitting in the hot garages for days at a time. This would attract ants and other critters such as mice.
  #11  
Old 05-31-2020, 07:05 AM
shortstack shortstack is offline
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 31
Thanks: 76
Thanked 34 Times in 21 Posts
Default Please tell me no!!

I do not believe that the restaurants or bars in The Villages recycle and IF that is true, how sad and irresponsible. I am against the burning idea. I would not like to breathe all of those fumes. What would the long term effects be if you did?
  #12  
Old 05-31-2020, 07:10 AM
coconutmama coconutmama is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 625
Thanks: 39
Thanked 356 Times in 193 Posts
Default Totally Agree on 2X a Week Pickup

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimchristie View Post
We need twice a week pick up because they don't allow us to use trash cans. Even if they did, my garage is not large enough to keep it inside which they wouldn't like either. Twice a week let's us avoid having stinking trash sitting in the hot garages for days at a time. This would attract ants and other critters such as mice.
We need more than once a week pickup. All areas, not just TV. But can you imagine renters & vacationers leaving trash out on the curb for a week after they leave?

Plus hate the idea of burning. Air quality is not that great already with all the burning of oak trees & brush.
  #13  
Old 05-31-2020, 07:26 AM
My Daily Run My Daily Run is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 307
Thanks: 2
Thanked 47 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Be informed
Covanta.com
  #14  
Old 05-31-2020, 07:28 AM
mjkspear mjkspear is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 18
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default

I will miss the recycling, because I think it's the right thing to do. I have been taking my newspapers to a church that has the dumpster out back, so they make money on the recycling. I have also begun buying cleaning supplies that are concentrated, so less containers coming in my house, and the company ships everything directly to me and no extra packaging. They have bins at Publix and Winn Dixie for plastic and paper bags as well as styrofoam.
  #15  
Old 05-31-2020, 07:29 AM
My Daily Run My Daily Run is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 307
Thanks: 2
Thanked 47 Times in 17 Posts
Default

You can still bring your newspapers to the church

With over 50 facilities around the world, Covanta is a leader in sustainable waste and energy solutions.
Our Energy-from-Waste facilities convert approximately 21 million tons of waste into enough renewable energy to power more than one million homes and recycle over 600,000 tons of metal annually! We also operate a number of material processing facilities and transfer stations that support Covanta's core Energy-from-Waste business, while helping customers reach their sustainability goals.
Closed Thread

Tags
recycling, understand, burn, garbage, reduce


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM.