Miscalculation of Bond Payoff Miscalculation of Bond Payoff - Talk of The Villages Florida

Miscalculation of Bond Payoff

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-27-2012, 08:43 PM
Advogado Advogado is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 62
Thanked 685 Times in 229 Posts
Default Miscalculation of Bond Payoff

In case you don't read the POA Bulletin, if you paid off the bond on your house, you may have been overcharged on the interest because of a miscalculation by the District Government.

As incredible as it seems, now that the miscalculation error has been discovered (apparently by a diligent homeowner), the District Government is not, on its own volition, checking the amounts of all the payoffs and refunding the overpayments it wrongly collected. Instead, if you paid off your bond and want to recover any overpayment, you need to obtain from the District office on Wedgewood Lane, fill out, and return to that office a form entitled "Request for Reimbursement of Bond Interest".

The District has said that it will then refund, to persons filling out and returning that form, any overpayments, whose recovery is not barred by the statute of limitations. In other words, if you paid off your bond, don't wait too long to file your claim.
  #2  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:11 AM
KeepingItReal's Avatar
KeepingItReal KeepingItReal is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 914
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Bond Interest (880) Corrections

Quote:
Originally Posted by Advogado View Post
In case you don't read the POA Bulletin, if you paid off the bond on your house, you may have been overcharged on the interest because of a miscalculation by the District Government.

As incredible as it seems, now that the miscalculation error has been discovered (apparently by a diligent homeowner), the District Government is not, on its own volition, checking the amounts of all the payoffs and refunding the overpayments it wrongly collected. Instead, if you paid off your bond and want to recover any overpayment, you need to obtain from the District office on Wedgewood Lane, fill out, and return to that office a form entitled "Request for Reimbursement of Bond Interest".

The District has said that it will then refund, to persons filling out and returning that form, any overpayments, whose recovery is not barred by the statute of limitations. In other words, if you paid off your bond, don't wait too long to file your claim.

There is a new article dated November 29th on the VCDD website and also in the Recreation News in the Daily Sun which explains there have been approximately 880 overpayments of bond interest identified. It also notes that only 30 of these residents have actually applied for their reimbursement. This took quite a bit of doing to prove to the VCDDs this was being done and it was being done incorrectly but you still have to apply for the refund if it applies to you. Makes you wonder what was being done with this money before this was identified since it was excess money?

Even if you haven't paid off the bond this may save you interest in the future depending on when within the year it is paid.


Village Community Development Districts

Last edited by KeepingItReal; 11-29-2012 at 11:31 AM. Reason: Add
  #3  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:21 AM
janmcn janmcn is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,298
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeepingItReal View Post
There is a new article dated November 29th on the VCDD website ans also in the Recreation news in the Daily Sun which explains there have been approximately 880 overpayments of bond interest identified. It also notes that only 30 of these residents have actually applied for their reimbursement. This took quite a bit of doing to prove to the VCDDs this was being done and it was being done incorrectly but you still have to apply for the refund if it applies to you. Makes you wonder what was being done with this money before this was identified since it was excess money?

Village Community Development Districts
Funny how these overpayments always benefit the developer and never the residents. It seems like it should be a simple process to notify these 850 residents that they were overcharged and what they have to do to apply for a reimbursement. They shouldn't have to rely on a website for the information. Who imposed the statute of limitations and why? Time is of the essence.
  #4  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:35 AM
eweissenbach's Avatar
eweissenbach eweissenbach is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Smithville (Kansas City) Mo./ LaBelle North
Posts: 4,572
Thanks: 113
Thanked 733 Times in 229 Posts
Send a message via AIM to eweissenbach
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Advogado View Post
In case you don't read the POA Bulletin, if you paid off the bond on your house, you may have been overcharged on the interest because of a miscalculation by the District Government.

As incredible as it seems, now that the miscalculation error has been discovered (apparently by a diligent homeowner), the District Government is not, on its own volition, checking the amounts of all the payoffs and refunding the overpayments it wrongly collected. Instead, if you paid off your bond and want to recover any overpayment, you need to obtain from the District office on Wedgewood Lane, fill out, and return to that office a form entitled "Request for Reimbursement of Bond Interest".

The District has said that it will then refund, to persons filling out and returning that form, any overpayments, whose recovery is not barred by the statute of limitations. In other words, if you paid off your bond, don't wait too long to file your claim.
Shame on THEM - there should never be a statute of limitations on doing the right thing! Once THEY discovered there was an error, every effort should have been made to determine who was affected and THEY should do the calculations and cut them a check regardless of any legal limitations THEY could claim.
__________________
Oldcoach Ed
"You cannot direct the wind, but you can adjust the sails" "Be yourself - everyone else is taken"
  #5  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:35 AM
KeepingItReal's Avatar
KeepingItReal KeepingItReal is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 914
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default 4 Year Statute

.....

Last edited by KeepingItReal; 02-13-2013 at 12:03 AM.
  #6  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:36 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Advogado View Post
In case you don't read the POA Bulletin, if you paid off the bond on your house, you may have been overcharged on the interest because of a miscalculation by the District Government.

As incredible as it seems, now that the miscalculation error has been discovered (apparently by a diligent homeowner), the District Government is not, on its own volition, checking the amounts of all the payoffs and refunding the overpayments it wrongly collected. Instead, if you paid off your bond and want to recover any overpayment, you need to obtain from the District office on Wedgewood Lane, fill out, and return to that office a form entitled "Request for Reimbursement of Bond Interest".

The District has said that it will then refund, to persons filling out and returning that form, any overpayments, whose recovery is not barred by the statute of limitations. In other words, if you paid off your bond, don't wait too long to file your claim.
I have wondered this for a long time and I am going to ask you, are YOU the lawyer that brought suit against the developers?

I, as many have pointed out, assume that the Morses mean to do the right thing, but others seem to think the opposite. Being rich doesn't mean you are unethical. It seems that some posters never have anything positive to say about them. I don't know them, the Morse family, and I am guessing you don't know them either. I haven't ever met anyone that does know them. But in my eyes they continue to do good things for us.

Here is a link to the article on page 6 of the POA Bulletin. "Have you prepaid your infrastructure bond"? And for those who don't know, the POA is the watchdog organization not one that is controlled by the developer.
http://www.poa4us.org/bulletins_file...etin201211.pdf
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #7  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:57 AM
KeepingItReal's Avatar
KeepingItReal KeepingItReal is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 914
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default It's A Business

Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl View Post
I have wondered this for a long time and I am going to ask you, are YOU the lawyer that brought suit against the developers?

I, as many have pointed out, assume that the Morses meant to do the right thing, but others seem to think the opposite. Being rich doesn't mean you are unethical.
I knew this post was coming and I don't mind telling you I was the resident that identified this error and fought the battle to get it corrected. It started at closing on 11/08/11 when an additional year's bond interest was tacked on to our closing statement even though we paid it off in full at closing. It was either close and pay it then and fight it later or refuse to close and have to file suit for our deposit back. I had numerous exchanges with all the VCDD management and even was sent a letter by the lawyers telling me I was wrong and I owed the full year's interest. I have all the letter's and records if anyone would like to see how much work this took. I did post on TOTV asking if anyone had run into this problem before. You may look at my posts for the dates if you wish.
The Villages is a large business first and foremost and businesses are in business to make money. It is no different from other developments and resorts that try to make it appealing to live there. After correspondence to Jennifer Morse Parr I was again told I was billed correctly and only after requesting a face to face meeting with Gary Morse did I get a positive response. I never did get to meet with Jennifer or Gary but did meet with the VP of development who immediately explained I was correct and would be sent a check for $721 for 1/2 the interest. As noted before I was also overcharged on my county taxes by $67 and it was refunded as well. We were told by our closing agent they only estimate the county taxes? There is absolutely nothing wrong with being high on the Villages of which I was totally excited to be moving here too but you have to be realistic and keep your eyes wide open. I will say this ordeal took a little bit of the shine off of the Villages experience for me and made it very clear the Villages is no better or worse than any other business ethically or otherwise.

MY Original Post 07/24/12

BOND Question Anyone Familiar With this Situation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you pay your bond off at closing 11/08/11 was it legal for us to be charged another $1,363.38 for the next year's interest on our bond up through 09/30/12? Seems ridiculous since our bond was paid in full at the first opportunity to pay it which was our closing yet we were required to pay basically another full year's interest at 6.85% on over $21k. None of this was ever disclosed to us by our agent though we ask about the bond repeatedly. We were only told about it after we had made our deposit and were told we would loose our deposit if we refused to pay the $1,363.38 and cancell the purchase. We know full disclosure was not made as required by the Florida CDD Statute attached below but are wanting to know if we were overcharged illegally as well? Have tried to work it out with the VCDD finance manager and Villages Realty but have been basically brushed off. Will be appealing to the govenor's office and an attorney.

We bought a spec house already built in October and closed November 08, 2011, our house was not even built until end of August so there was no way the bond could have been paid in JULY. We did buy through VR and a VR agent.

CDD Statute 190.009 Disclosure of public financing. FLORIDA STATE LAW I WAS ADVISED BIG MONEY TALKS IN FLORIDA
(1) The district shall take affirmative steps to provide for the full disclosure of information relating to the public financing and maintenance of improvements to real property undertaken by the district. Such information shall be made available to all existing residents, and to all prospective residents, of the district. The district shall furnish each developer of a residential development within the district with sufficient copies of that information to provide each prospective initial purchaser of property in that development with a copy, and any developer of a residential development within the district, when required by law to provide a public offering statement, shall include a copy of such information relating to the public financing and maintenance of improvements in the public offering statement. The district shall file the disclosure documents required by this subsection and any amendments thereto in the property records of each county in which the district is located.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by KeepingItReal; 07-24-2012 at 09:20 PM.

Last edited by KeepingItReal; 02-13-2013 at 12:02 AM.
  #8  
Old 11-29-2012, 02:36 PM
Bogie Shooter Bogie Shooter is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19,755
Thanks: 13
Thanked 6,120 Times in 2,719 Posts
Default

I guess the bottom line is The Villages made a mistake. And because one individual was smart enough to raise the question and brought it to conclusion, now all are receiving the benefit. Good for him.
But, many businesses make mistakes, the paper boy makes mistakes, the local, state and federal governments make mistakes. They too benefit unitil or when it is corrected. Was the mistake by TV intentional? I doubt anymore than anyone else who makes a mistake.
Wondering what happened to the money is just silly. If the process as previously defined was being used it was not extra money, because it was expected.
  #9  
Old 11-29-2012, 02:53 PM
mickey100 mickey100 is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,022
Thanks: 331
Thanked 333 Times in 107 Posts
Default

No one is saying it is anything more than a mistake. But it would not be a difficult matter to go thru the records, get the names of people who were overcharged, and send them a letter letting them know they are owed money. That would be the ethical thing to do, and I question why it isn't being done.
  #10  
Old 11-29-2012, 03:16 PM
janmcn janmcn is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,298
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter View Post
I guess the bottom line is The Villages made a mistake. And because one individual was smart enough to raise the question and brought it to conclusion, now all are receiving the benefit. Good for him.
But, many businesses make mistakes, the paper boy makes mistakes, the local, state and federal governments make mistakes. They too benefit unitil or when it is corrected. Was the mistake by TV intentional? I doubt anymore than anyone else who makes a mistake.
Wondering what happened to the money is just silly. If the process as previously defined was being used it was not extra money, because it was expected.
Funny how these people are considered business geniuses until they get caught with their hands in the cookie jar, and then it is just a simple mistake. You don't have to have a lot of business acumen to know that you don't charge interest on money that's already been paid back.
  #11  
Old 11-29-2012, 06:55 PM
KeepingItReal's Avatar
KeepingItReal KeepingItReal is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 914
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Extra Money

....

Last edited by KeepingItReal; 02-12-2013 at 01:43 AM.
  #12  
Old 11-29-2012, 07:42 PM
manaboutown manaboutown is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NJ, NM, SC, PA, DC, MD, VA, NY, CA, ID and finally FL.
Posts: 7,875
Thanks: 14,342
Thanked 5,110 Times in 1,956 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeepingItReal View Post
It was extra money in that it was over and above that which was required to pay off the bond. They took in more in interest than was required to pay the interest so the difference in the two amounts was EXTRA MONEY which should have been accumulating in the books somewhere and no it is not silly to wonder about it. Somewhere there should have been indications more money was being collected than was being required to pay the bond interest. If each of the 880 overcharged were due $721 it would amount to over $634,000.00. Apparently this pool of money is being used to pay back the overcharges but only if a request is submitted.
This situation reminds me of the reports Citizens adds another 1/4% or so to the going rate for mortgages offered by competing lenders. People borrow from Citizens for fear of not closing in time and being penalized. A little here, a little there, it all adds to the bottom line.
  #13  
Old 11-29-2012, 08:18 PM
janmcn janmcn is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,298
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeepingItReal View Post
It was extra money in that it was over and above that which was required to pay off the bond. They took in more in interest than was required to pay the interest so the difference in the two amounts was EXTRA MONEY which should have been accumulating in the books somewhere and no it is not silly to wonder about it. Somewhere there should have been indications more money was being collected than was being required to pay the bond interest. If each of the 880 overcharged were due $721 it would amount to over $634,000.00. Apparently this pool of money is being used to pay back the overcharges but only if a request is submitted.
Are they paying interest on the amount of EXTRA MONEY they took by mistake? Silly question. But if the shoe were on the other foot, the residents would be handed a bill for interest compounded daily, IMHO .

Last edited by janmcn; 11-30-2012 at 10:13 AM.
  #14  
Old 11-29-2012, 08:22 PM
downeaster downeaster is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Thank you KeepingItReal. Not only did you fight the system to get what is due you, you made it possible for 880 of us to get what we are due. Thanks also for the detailed report of how you finally prevailed.

When we paid off our bond I guess my head was still in the clouds and I accepted their explanation of why I was paying interest on funds that were paid off. (Honestly, I didn't just fall off a turnip truck, but, like I said, my head was in the clouds).

This incident along with some past situations have really put a damper on my opinion and enthusiasm. The shine is becoming tarnished. Or I might say as our cousins across the pond would say "the penny finally dropped".

Kudos the POA as well.
  #15  
Old 11-30-2012, 08:18 AM
quirky3's Avatar
quirky3 quirky3 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,696
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Bravo!

Quote:
Originally Posted by downeaster View Post
Thank you KeepingItReal. Not only did you fight the system to get what is due you, you made it possible for 880 of us to get what we are due. Thanks also for the detailed report of how you finally prevailed.

When we paid off our bond I guess my head was still in the clouds and I accepted their explanation of why I was paying interest on funds that were paid off. (Honestly, I didn't just fall off a turnip truck, but, like I said, my head was in the clouds).

This incident along with some past situations have really put a damper on my opinion and enthusiasm. The shine is becoming tarnished. Or I might say as our cousins across the pond would say "the penny finally dropped".

Kudos the POA as well.
__________________
"Carpe the heck out of your Diems- with joy!"

"Do no harm" (but take no sh**!)
Closed Thread


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 AM.