Number 10 GI |
08-31-2020 02:07 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby
(Post 1825961)
Actually no, it bestows those rights on a well-regulated Militia.
Are you a member of the Militia? No? Then it's not a "right," for you. Are you wanting to be a member of the Militia? Then great. You pass. If you want to possess a firearm but are not willing to be a member of a well-regulated Militia, willing and able and prepared to fight against a tyrannical government, then you are asking for a privilege and not a constitutional right.
So prove that you a) know the law, b) can see your target with or without glasses. c) know how to use the weapon properly.
Are you saying you shouldn't have to prove any of those three things? If that's the case, let's just arm every man, woman, and child - if they're capable of holding a weapon, then they get to have one. Don't bother teaching them how to use it - because knowing how isn't required by the Constitution. Of course - ammunition is also not a Constitutional right. They can have firearms - but nowhere in the Constitution does it say those firearms can be loaded.
You want to pick nits? I can pick them all day.
Edited because I had a brain-poop and swapped out "well-armed" with what should've been "well-regulated." And by regulated - they meant "controls." It meant that even the constitution agrees that there should be some CONTROLS over how and who and under what circumstances a person gets to enjoy that right to bear arms.
|
Wrong, wrong, wrong! Please do some research. The US Supreme Court ruled in DC vs Heller that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution does indeed protect an individual’s right to possess a firearm for private matters and use within the home in federal enclaves. Militia membership has noting to do with private ownership of guns.
Also at that time "regulated" meant well equipped, not controlled.
Are people required to receive training and demonstrate they can properly raise a child? Bad parenting creates more problems in this country than guns.
Are you required to have completed education on how our government works and to prove it in a test before you can vote? Voting for the wrong person or party has created a lot of serious problems in this country. Need proof, check out the the anarchy and lawlessness being demonstrated in Portland, Chicago, etc., that the governors and mayors completely ignore.
Nope ammunition isn't mentioned in the Constitution but neither is food, clothing, medical care, and on and on so I guess we can't have those items either. Can't have gasoline for our motor vehicles, not in the constitution.
Nit picking is one thing but ridiculous hyperbole only shows the weakness of your argument.
|