Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#46
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
|
#47
|
||
|
||
Quote:
All points stated before. =Tax increase after years of none. =Developments have infrastructure. =Roads wear out. =Expansion need sheriff, courts, health, etc. =Trio are inexperienced, clueless and need education
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful |
#48
|
||
|
||
Quote:
So all this whining is for less than $1 per day. County Taxes, State Taxes & Federal Taxes are used for roads that I will never use and that you will never use. Less than $1 per day. Even if the Impacts Fee were at 100% of the Professionally Recommended structure, the property taxes would have still increased by over 22%. Less than $1 per day.
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful |
#49
|
||
|
||
By about a two-to-one margin, the voters of Sumter County have already rejected the pseudo economics set forth both on this site (in posts by a couple of Developer defenders) and in the Daily Sun (in a series of so-called articles written by the Developer's Minister of Propaganda, David R. Corder). By electing the EMS Team to the County Commission, the voters decided that the current residents of Sumter County should not give the Developer hundreds of millions of their dollars by paying, through the residents' property-taxes, for county infrastructure that the Developer should be paying for through his impact fees.
Now, it is up to the new Commissioners, Messrs. Estep, Miller, and Search, to make good on their campaign promise by ending the Developer's sweetheart deal on impact fees and cutting our property taxes. With a majority on the Commission, they should do so NOW. Commissioner Miller is trying to do so. Commissioners Estep and Search voted to defer action until July. Contact Commissioners Estep and Search and ask them to keep their campaign promise and to do so now. Deferral of action until July is putting millions of dollars into the Developer's pocket at our expense. The phone number Messrs. Estep and Search is 352-689-4400. |
#50
|
||
|
||
Quote:
Yes, hate to defer action and get the inexperienced Commissioners educated........uneducated Commissioners & posters is much better.
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful |
#51
|
||
|
||
Quote:
The real issue here is the crony capitalism that is putting hundreds of millions of residents' dollars into the pocket of the Developer. He packed the County Commission with his puppets. The puppets then gave him a sweetheart deal on impact fees and hit the residents with a massive property-tax increase. And I have been doing something to address this malfeasance, not "whining". This includes doing what I could to replace 3 of the Developer's puppet Commissioners with the EMS Team in the last election and insisting that the EMS Team keep their campaign promise. If anybody has been "whining", it is the defenders of the Developer now that his sweetheart deal on impact fees is under attack. |
#52
|
||
|
||
The new Commissioners had a full year to study impact fees. They don't need another six months. Time is money.
|
#53
|
||
|
||
My thoughts too. It seems to me that there is a lobbying effort at foot again. I am not a fan.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry. |
#54
|
||
|
||
Quote:
Yes everyone can afford it, otherwise they should not be in a $300,000 house. If they are not in a $300k home, they are not paying $1 per day. Developers DO NOT pay 100%. Counties & Commissioners want growth & they give incentives. You have been asked for proof of your "puppet" label and have never delivered support. You may think it, but you have no proof. Yes EMS is in. They have no experience. Made promises and voters fell for campaign promises. Not sure I would be proud. Hundreds of millions did not go into the Developer's pocket. So many posters have tried to educate you. Please learn, you might be a happier person.
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful |
#55
|
||
|
||
Quote:
If you answer "both", how should the costs be split? Right now the Developer is paying 40% for the roads and 0% for everything else. The current residents are now paying 60% and 100% respectively. Two thirds of the voters decided that this isn't fair. |
#56
|
||
|
||
Quote:
What you don't understand, if the Developer pays 100% of the Impact Study Fee .......you will NEVER get the 25% increase reversed. Never. That's what you are whining for. It ain't going to happen. Also what you don't understand is the timing of revenues vs expenditure for the County. Even with 100% fee schedule, the County would be upside down on cashflow. I'm for the Developer paying 100% of the Impact Fee Schedule. The Villages will be glad to pay that schedule as well. It's only a couple grand price increase per house. Not sure if it's fair for a developer or a McDonalds down in Linden Florida to pay the fee. New business will be hit with the new schedule.....fair??.....nope. Impact Fees are meant for capital improvements, not operating expenses. Operating expenses are paid by taxes. Take time to do the math, understand commissioners' charters, County Government, and purpose of impact fees and maybe you will be a wiser voter next time.......rather than pushing and supporting inexperience and a silly promise. Hope you have a nice day..............one of these days.
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful |
#57
|
||
|
||
Quote:
__________________
The difference between genius and stupidity is genius has its limits - Albert Einstein |
#58
|
||
|
||
Quote:
For your information: The "development" bonds to which you refer, but apparently don't understand, only cover infrastructure within the relevant Community Development District. To determine what appropriate impact fees should be for county infrastructure requires a study by a consulting firm, as was done regarding the road costs. Until that study is done, nobody knows what those impact fees should be. I have never claimed to have that information. They may turn out to be less that Collier County, but could turn out to be more. Bottom line: somebody has to pay for the additional infrastructure-- the Developer or the current residents. You seem to be arguing that it should be the current residents. If so, why don't you simply say so instead of accusing me of lying. Last edited by Advogado; 02-23-2021 at 01:57 PM. |
#59
|
||
|
||
Bottom line: somebody has to pay for the additional infrastructure-- New residents or the current residents. You seem to be arguing that it should be the new residents. If so, why don't you simply say so, instead of trying to convince people that "the developer" will pay?
|
#60
|
||
|
||
Quote:
__________________
The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell. “Only truth and transparency can guarantee freedom”, John McCain |
Closed Thread |
|
|