Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#16
|
||
|
||
Quote:
I've got to change my Avatar. Xavier |
|
#17
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#18
|
||
|
||
Quote:
EVERYWHERE the house market is taking a bath. It is less affected here than in most places....at least now. HOWEVER who knows what will happen to our home values if some of our own residents keep trashing this area and the developers. I challenge you to find any place in this country that is more solid than this place as an investment. I have said way too much. I get so angry when it is the same thing over and over and over. It is true there is nothing new about the IRS. |
#19
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#20
|
||
|
||
At this stage of the game, I think the best place for up to date info in this subject is the POA monthly bulletin. They keep tabs on the status and will have an article if the status changes. If you want an independent view of what’s hot in TV, this is a good start in addition to TOTV.
Note that the TV POA is an independent organization not tied to the developer. |
#21
|
||
|
||
Gracie, I do understand your feelings but the IRS issue is a legitimate issue for new buyers. I don't think the question was brought up to bash TV or the Morses but was an honest concern with hopes that an answer was available. Sadly, there isn't. It is a wait and see situation. There is no question that IF the final outcome is against the developers, it will affect our taxes and fees. However, as yet, we have no idea what will happen and we probably won't for many years -- there are still a few levels of appeals to go through before an ultimate settlement (if found against the developer) is reached.
I honestly don't think questioning the Morses' ethics affects TV property values. This is a beautiful community. It is well run; the homeowners care about the property; the homes are well-built; the Morses make sure everything looks good. Whether they do because they care about the appearance or because they do it to help them sell homes is irrelevant. It is what it is and, in this case, what it is is wonderful!
__________________
Army/embassy brat - traveled too much to mention Moved here from SF Bay Area (East Bay) "There are only two ways to live your life: One is as though nothing is a miracle; the other is as though everything is a miracle." Albert Einstein |
#22
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#23
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#24
|
||
|
||
IRS investigation
This sounds like it could be a pretty critical issue. Has anyone heard anymore or does anyone know what impact an adverse decision could have on property owners?
|
#25
|
||
|
||
Quote:
http://www.districtgov.org/IRSupdate.aspx Bill |
#26
|
||
|
||
IRS issue
This latest update makes it as clear as mud.
|
#27
|
||
|
||
That is the intent. I am told not to look to either the District or the POA to provide any detailed explanation because they haven't and they won't.
As residents of TV we are paying handsomely for use of various amenities and so I certainly can't afford an additional financial burden. So let's hope the Developer and District prevail. |
#28
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#29
|
||
|
||
The irs/bond issue has nothing to do with amenities. The proceeds from the bond sales was used for infrastructure (water, sewer,irrigation mains,storm drains,curbs and paving). This would normally be rolled into the price of each home, but here, the expense is kept seperate in the form of a bond payment.
__________________
........American by birth....Union by choice |
#30
|
||
|
||
Boogie Shooter: The question is not "do you think they have anymoe to share?" No, the question to be asked is "Have they shared everything they know about this case to date?".............I think not
Mulligan: You are partly correct. However the Developer also had to calculate the flow of income from amenities which were then purchased by the District. I am not being negative or accusatory here only attempting to share information. Please don't shoot the messenger |
Closed Thread |
|
|