IRS ruling

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-16-2013, 07:05 PM
Dreamer61 Dreamer61 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Virginia, Santo Domingo
Posts: 190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default IRS ruling

First, i'm not asking for you to make a decision for me. I was accused of that last time I asked a question on this subject. To us this is a serious issue. We have a contract on a home in TV and are very excited about our purchase! I'm only asking if someone can explain to me what the worst case scenario could be with this ruling? I've read that the homeowners could be held responsible for the taxes. Which homeowners? Every homeowner in TV? Certain counties? I understand everyone is tired of this subject but for us new comers its needs to be discussed. So just asking....worst case scenario?? Thank you for your replies!
  #2  
Old 07-16-2013, 07:27 PM
mulligan mulligan is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,990
Thanks: 17
Thanked 345 Times in 153 Posts
Default

It's the bondholders that are taxed. I don't see a problem, except that the developer may need to buy back the bonds and re-issue.
__________________
........American by birth....Union by choice
  #3  
Old 07-16-2013, 08:26 PM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,008
Thanks: 4,856
Thanked 5,507 Times in 1,907 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

No one can assure you that you or any of us won't be affected. There are many who are opposed to the developer that will assure you that you will be affected.

I don't think so.

Just hit the search button and type in IRS. This has been discussed for five plus years. You will quickly see who takes what side but the truth is no one knows what will happen. Many of us have bought full knowing about this issue. I am surprised you haven't heard about it until now.

Here is a link to a page full of threads and dozens of opinions and that is what you will get unfortunately...just opinions. It is a very complicated issue but what it does not mean is that the developer is behind on his taxes.
https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...archid=6465294
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #4  
Old 07-16-2013, 08:46 PM
Dreamer61 Dreamer61 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Virginia, Santo Domingo
Posts: 190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Grace, no what's so ever disrespect! I'm not asking for assurance but facts. And I'm not interested in thousands of opinions of the past. I would like it if someone could give us the worst case scenario based on the current ruling. We've known of this issue for months now and decided to purchase anyhow. Thanks for your comment!
  #5  
Old 07-16-2013, 09:05 PM
TVMayor's Avatar
TVMayor TVMayor is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Village Rio Grande
Posts: 697
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Fact #1, scenarios are no facts.
Fact #2, the current rulings do not include any penalties.
__________________
MI, Pontiac, Waterford, Southfield, Farmington, FL.--> Ron's my name and pool's my game.
  #6  
Old 07-16-2013, 09:55 PM
Bogie Shooter Bogie Shooter is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,877
Thanks: 11
Thanked 5,368 Times in 2,396 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamer61 View Post
Grace, no what's so ever disrespect! I'm not asking for assurance but facts. And I'm not interested in thousands of opinions of the past. I would like it if someone could give us the worst case scenario based on the current ruling. We've known of this issue for months now and decided to purchase anyhow. Thanks for your comment!
You and everyone else would like to know the answer. All you are going to get are the same rehashed opinions that are posted on TOTV.
Even the "sky is falling" Laren Ritchie, of the Orlando Sentinel, gives here opinion every 2-3 months.
The POA has even withheld an opinion on the conclusion, you can read all about it here
Property Owners, Association of Florida
  #7  
Old 07-17-2013, 10:24 AM
OpusX1's Avatar
OpusX1 OpusX1 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Villages
Posts: 793
Thanks: 5
Thanked 99 Times in 35 Posts
Default

I do not believe there is a precedent to look back on so the truth is no one knows. Anything beyond that is a guess based on a opinion.
  #8  
Old 07-17-2013, 10:29 AM
Golfingnut Golfingnut is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The Villages
Posts: 2,780
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Residents did not commit any wrong doing nor did we have financial benefit from the bonds in question; therefore, we will not be effected no matter what the IRS decides to do.
  #9  
Old 07-17-2013, 04:24 PM
Advogado Advogado is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 62
Thanked 685 Times in 229 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golfingnut View Post
Residents did not commit any wrong doing nor did we have financial benefit from the bonds in question; therefore, we will not be effected no matter what the IRS decides to do.
The situation is a little more complicated than you indicate. The potential impact on residents is explained here: http://poa4us.org/bulletins_files/bulletin200908.pdf
  #10  
Old 07-17-2013, 04:29 PM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,008
Thanks: 4,856
Thanked 5,507 Times in 1,907 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Dreamer...read all of the threads. There is a common thread among them and generally the same answers from the same people.

Surprisingly, one of the best explainers of the whole thing is EdvinMass or Edv. He lives in Stonecrest.

I don't know how he knows so much, but his posts are clearer than most on the subject.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #11  
Old 07-17-2013, 05:53 PM
Warren Kiefer Warren Kiefer is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,418
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamer61 View Post
First, i'm not asking for you to make a decision for me. I was accused of that last time I asked a question on this subject. To us this is a serious issue. We have a contract on a home in TV and are very excited about our purchase! I'm only asking if someone can explain to me what the worst case scenario could be with this ruling? I've read that the homeowners could be held responsible for the taxes. Which homeowners? Every homeowner in TV? Certain counties? I understand everyone is tired of this subject but for us new comers its needs to be discussed. So just asking....worst case scenario?? Thank you for your replies

Worse case ; The developer ducks his moral responsibility in accordance the IRS ruling and We the Villagers have to pay that amount ruled ineligible.
Closed Thread


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 AM.